2013 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal Symposium: "Concussion Conundrum", 2013 Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
2013 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal Symposium: "Concussion Conundrum", Marc Edelman, Michael Marino, Cailyn Reilly, Gordon Cooney
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Where Is Concussion Litigation Headed? The Impact Of Riddell, Inc. V. Schutt Sports, Inc. On Brain Injury Law, 2013 Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Where Is Concussion Litigation Headed? The Impact Of Riddell, Inc. V. Schutt Sports, Inc. On Brain Injury Law, Cailyn Reilly
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Disaggregating, 2013 University of Georgia School of Law
Disaggregating, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Commonality is a defining characteristic of mass-tort litigation. But mass-tort claimants typically do not share enough in common to warrant class certification. That is, commonality does not predominate. Yet, without class certification, judges cannot conclude these cases as a unit absent a private settlement.
This paradox prompts two questions. First, what level of commonality justifies aggregating mass torts, shorn of Rule 23’s procedural protections? And, second, should the federal judicial system continue to centralize claims with nominal commonality when judges typically cannot resolve them collectively absent a private settlement? This Article’s title suggests one answer: if minimal commonality continues to …
The Dark Side Of The Boom: The Peculiar Dilemma Of Modern False Claims Act Litigation, 2013 Jones Day
The Dark Side Of The Boom: The Peculiar Dilemma Of Modern False Claims Act Litigation, David S. Torborg
Journal of Law and Health
Spurred by treble damages, substantial penalties, and lucrative relator awards, litigation under federal and state False Claims Act (“FCA”) statutes has exploded in recent years. Much of that explosion stems from aggressive and creative legal theories that challenge controversial industry practices or even well-known loopholes or waste in government policy. Evidence from governmental entities can be critically important in litigating these FCA claims. Unique aspects of False Claims Act actions, however, can aggravate the risk of losing this important evidence, leaving the parties, judges, and juries without the evidentiary record necessary to equitably adjudicate these disputes. Defendants can face the …
Plaintiff Control And Domination In Multidistrict Mass Torts, 2013 University at Buffalo School of Law
Plaintiff Control And Domination In Multidistrict Mass Torts, S. Todd Brown
Cleveland State Law Review
The Supreme Court’s recent decisions concerning preclusion doctrine stress the “deep-rooted historic tradition that everyone should have his own day in court.” Nonetheless, “properly conducted class actions” are a recognized exception to this general rule because such actions ensure that nonparties are “adequately represented by someone with the same interests who was a party to the suit.” Mass torts, however, frequently involve numerous plaintiffs with diverse legal and factual issues that are not “sufficiently cohesive to warrant adjudication by representation.” Thus, it may be reasonably feared that the Court’s firm insistence on preserving individual autonomy will deny plaintiffs the economies …
The Inner Morality Of Private Law, 2013 Fordham University School of Law
The Inner Morality Of Private Law, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
Lon Fuller's classic The Morality of Law is an exploration of the basic principles of a legal system: the law should be publicly promulgated, prospective, clear, and general. So deep are these principles, he argued, that too great a deviation from them would not simply create a bad legal system and bad law, but would render the products of such a system undeserving of the name "law" at all. In this essay, I argue that Fuller's basic principles are not in fact desiderata for all of law, observing that much of private law plainly flouts them; it is unwritten, retroactive, …
Fukushima: Catastrophe, Compensation, And Justice In Japan, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Fukushima: Catastrophe, Compensation, And Justice In Japan, Eric Feldman
All Faculty Scholarship
Well before the Fukushima disaster of March 11, 2011, governments in the developed world struggled with victim compensation in cases of environmental contamination, harms caused by pharmaceutical products, terrorist attacks, and more. All of those are important precedents to Fukushima, but none of them approach the breadth of harms resulting from the triple disaster of huge earthquake, massive tsunami, and nuclear meltdown now known in Japan as 3/11. With close to 20,000 people dead or missing, one million homes fully destroyed or seriously damaged, and 100,000 people displaced, getting those whose lives were affected by the events in Fukushima back …
Head In The Clouds, Feet Firmly Grounded In Physical Proof: Emphasis On The Tangible In Actions Against Internet Search Engines And Aggregators, 2013 Seton Hall Law
Head In The Clouds, Feet Firmly Grounded In Physical Proof: Emphasis On The Tangible In Actions Against Internet Search Engines And Aggregators, Briehan Moran
Student Works
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Judge In Non-Class Settlement, 2013 Fordham University School of Law
The Role Of The Judge In Non-Class Settlement, Howard M. Erichson
Faculty Scholarship
This commentary argues that judges lack the authority, as a general matter, to approve or reject non-class settlements. While judges overseeing mass litigation can set the stage for settlement by instituting phased discovery, scheduling bellwether trials, and other methods, they should respect the line between facilitation of settlement and control over settlement terms. The paper was presented in response to Judge Alvin Hellerstein’s and his special masters' account of their handling of the September 11 clean-up litigation.
Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply To Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, And Robinette, 2013 Fordham University School of Law
Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply To Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, And Robinette, Benjamin C. Zipursky, John C.P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
As part of a symposium issue of the Indiana Law Journal devoted to our Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law, we respond to criticisms by Judge Calabresi, Judge Posner, and Professors Chamallas, Robinette, and Rustad. Calabresi and Posner criticize Civil Recourse Theory as a bit of glib moralism that fails to generate useful answers to the difficult questions that courts face when applying Tort Law. We show with several examples, both old and new, that the glibness is all on their side. From duty to causation to punitive damages, from products liability to fraud to privacy, our scholarship has had …
The Fraud-On-The-Market Tort, 2013 Harvard Law School
The Fraud-On-The-Market Tort, John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
Fraud on the market is at the core of contemporary securities law, permitting 10b-5 class actions to proceed without direct proof of investor reliance on a misrepresentation. Yet the ambiguities of this idea have fractured the Supreme Court from its initial recognition of the doctrine in Basic v. Levinson to its recent decision in Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds. Amidst divergent views of the coherence and advisability of liability for fraud on the market a fundamental question lurks: is a suit for damages that invokes the fraud-on-the-market theory a claim for common law deceit, such that …
Understanding Causation In Private Securities Lawsuits: Building On Amgen, 2013 Duke Law School
Understanding Causation In Private Securities Lawsuits: Building On Amgen, James D. Cox
Faculty Scholarship
With Amgen, the Supreme Court’s majority once again holds that inquiry into the alleged market impact of a misrepresentation is not required to invoke fraud on the market approach to causation so that the class can be certified. Rather than just leaving matters where they have been since the Supreme Court’s muddled encounter with causation in Basic Inc. v. Levinson, the Supreme Court’s most recent decision appears to relax some earlier-held tenets with respect to markets believed sufficiently efficient for fraud on the market to be invoked. This Article not only identifies the central flaw of Basic that has over …
The Impact Of Medical Liability Standards On Regional Variations In Physician Behavior: Evidence From The Adoption Of National-Standard Rules, 2013 Duke Law School
The Impact Of Medical Liability Standards On Regional Variations In Physician Behavior: Evidence From The Adoption Of National-Standard Rules, Michael D. Frakes
Faculty Scholarship
I explore the association between regional variations in physician behavior and the geographical scope of malpractice standards of care. I estimate a 30–50 percent reduction in the gap between state and national utilization rates of various treatments and diagnostic procedures following the adoption of a rule requiring physicians to follow national, as opposed to local, standards. These findings suggest that standardization in malpractice law may lead to greater standardization in practices and, more generally, that physicians may indeed adhere to specific liability standards. In connection with the estimated convergence in practices, I observe no associated changes in patient health.
Mass Torts And Universal Jurisdiction, 2013 University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Mass Torts And Universal Jurisdiction, Vivian Grosswald Curran
Articles
The technologies of the present era mean that injuries have become more massive in dimension. Mass torts affect greater numbers of people and larger geographical areas. Consequently, they can cross borders, affecting the populations of multiple countries. One of the two mechanisms in tort law for remedying mass catastrophes. restricted to cases involving jus cogens violations (namely, violations of human rights so grave as to be against international customary law, or the "law of nations"), is universal jurisdiction pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute (ATS).
Despite the distinctive official restriction of universal jurisdiction to the criminal law domain in civilian …
Veil-Piercing Unbound, 2013 University of PIttsburgh School of Law
Veil-Piercing Unbound, Peter B. Oh
Articles
Veil-piercing is an equitable remedy. This simple insight has been lost over time. What started as a means for corporate creditors to reach into the personal assets of a shareholder has devolved into a doctrinal black hole. Courts apply an expansive list of amorphous factors, attenuated from the underlying harm, that engenders under-inclusive, unprincipled, and unpredictable results for entrepreneurs, litigants, and scholars alike.
Veil-piercing is misapplied because it is misconceived. The orthodox approach is to view veil-piercing as an exception to limited liability that is justified potentially only when the latter is not, a path that invariably leads to examining …
Tort Liability In The Age Of The Helicopter Parent, 2013 University of Washington School of Law
Tort Liability In The Age Of The Helicopter Parent, Elizabeth G. Porter
Articles
Discussions of parental liability by courts and legal scholars are often tinged with fear: fear that government interference will chill parental autonomy; fear that parents will be held liable for their children’s every misdeed; and, recently, fear that a new generation of so-called “helicopter parents” who hover over their children’s every move will establish unrealistically high legal standards for parenting. However, in the context of common law suits against parents, these fears are misguided. To the contrary, courts have consistently shielded wealthier parents — those most likely to be defendants in civil suits — from exposure to liability for conduct …
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, 2013 Duke Law School
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, Paul D. Carrington
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
La Interseccion De La Responsabilidad Extracontractual Y El Derecho Constitucional Y Los Derechos Humanos, 2013 Duke Law School
La Interseccion De La Responsabilidad Extracontractual Y El Derecho Constitucional Y Los Derechos Humanos, George C. Christie
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
No Duty To Warn Of Drug Interactions: A Dangerous Prescription, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 533 (2013), 2013 UIC School of Law
No Duty To Warn Of Drug Interactions: A Dangerous Prescription, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 533 (2013), Ryanne Bush Dent
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sacrificial Lambs: Compensating First Subscribers To Fda-Approved Medications For Postmarketing Injuries Resulting From Unlabeled Adverse Events, 2013 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Sacrificial Lambs: Compensating First Subscribers To Fda-Approved Medications For Postmarketing Injuries Resulting From Unlabeled Adverse Events, Rodney K. Miller
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.