Washington and Lee University School of Law
Pepperdine University
Cleveland State University
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Boston College Law School
University of Michigan Law School
Orwellian Surveillance Of Vehicular Travels,
2014
SelectedWorks
Orwellian Surveillance Of Vehicular Travels, Sam Hanna
Sam Hanna
What would someone learn about you if all your automobile travels were ubiquitously tracked beginning today? Creating an indefinite database of a person’s previous automobile travels to formulate deductions on intimate details of people's lives is precisely what law enforcement agencies are currently able to accomplish with automatic license plate recognition (“ALPR”). With the ubiquity of ALPR cameras, continuous government surveillance of automobile travels is no longer a figment of the imagination. Consequently, the judicial and legislative branches of government must embark on balancing the private and public interests implicated by this technology. Failure to set suitable boundaries ...
Section 702 And The Collection Of International Telephone And Internet Content,
2014
Georgetown University Law Center
Section 702 And The Collection Of International Telephone And Internet Content, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorizes the NSA and others to collect the electronic communications of non-U.S. targets located overseas. Recent media reports and declassified documents reveal a more extensive program than was previously publicly understood. The article begins by considering the origins of the current programs and the relevant authorities—particularly the transfer of part of the President’s Surveillance Program, instituted just after 9/11, to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). It outlines the contours of the 2007 Protect America Act, before its replacement in 2008 by the FISA Amendments Act (FAA ...
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant,
2014
College of William & Mary Law School
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
Riley V. California: Privacy Still Matters, But How Much And In What Contexts?,
2014
SelectedWorks
Riley V. California: Privacy Still Matters, But How Much And In What Contexts?, Adam Lamparello, Charles Maclean
Adam Lamparello
Private information is no longer stored only in homes or other areas traditionally protected from warrantless intrusion. The private lives of many citizens are contained in a digital device no larger than the palm of their hand—and carried in public places. But that does not make the data within a cell phone any less private, just as the dialing of a phone number does not voluntarily waive an individual’s right to keep their call log or location private. Remember that we are not talking about individuals suspected of committing violent crimes. The Government is recording the calls and ...
Symposium: Surprising Unanimity, Even More Surprising Clarity,
2014
College of William & Mary Law School
Symposium: Surprising Unanimity, Even More Surprising Clarity, Adam M. Gershowitz
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation In The October 2005 Term,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation In The October 2005 Term, Martin Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Cloudy Forecast: Divergence In The Cloud Computing Laws Of The United States, European Union, And China,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
A Cloudy Forecast: Divergence In The Cloud Computing Laws Of The United States, European Union, And China, Tina Cheng
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Beyond The Judicial Fourth Amendment: The Prosecutor's Role,
2014
NELLCO
Beyond The Judicial Fourth Amendment: The Prosecutor's Role, Russell M. Gold
New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers
Scholarly discussion of the Fourth Amendment focuses narrowly on judicial enforcement and the exclusionary rule. This Article takes a different approach: recognizing that prosecutors have a co-equal responsibility to enforce the Fourth Amendment. More specifically, prosecutors have a constitutional and ethical duty not to use evidence that they conclude was unconstitutionally obtained even if that evidence is admissible — the duty of administrative suppression. Instead of analyzing whether evidence would likely be deemed admissible by a court, prosecutors should instead analyze whether the evidence in their cases was gathered unconstitutionally and act accordingly.
Scholars have ignored that as the Supreme Court ...
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant,
2014
College of William & Mary Law School
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures, Richard C. Worf
Touro Law Review
This article examines the constitutional status of suspicionless searches and seizures of groups- an exceedingly important question in the age of terror, and a subject recently brought back to the forefront by the searches of subway passengers in New York City. It draws on process theory to argue that when a legislature has authorized a group search or seizure, courts should generally apply rational basis review.
First, other areas of constitutional doctrine exhibit deep trust in the power of groups to protect their interests in political process, and there is no reason why fourth amendment doctrine should not do the ...
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith, Jessica Miller
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, People V. Hall,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, People V. Hall, Eric Pack
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, Koeiman V. New York,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Appellate Division, First Department, Koeiman V. New York, Gennaro Savastano
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Burton,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Burton, Diane Matero
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Moore,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. Moore, Gennaro Savastano
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation From The October 2006 Term,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation From The October 2006 Term, Martin Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Criminal Procedure Decisions From The October 2006 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Ruppert,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Ruppert, Sardar Asadullah
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Willette,
2014
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Supreme Court Of New York Appellate Division, Third Department - People V. Willette, Mark Tsukerman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
