Are They Pirates Or Pioneers?, 2017 University of Pennsylvania (2012)
Are They Pirates Or Pioneers?, Ashley Song
Hyein Ashley Song Ms.
Korea has the perceptive corruption level lower than the Western countries and shares the common appetite for the cultural products with the Japanese, often regarding Japanese more noble or superior and Westerns even more. Based on this sentiment, the ‘license musicals’ which have been bilaterally purchased from the West are popularly consumed in Korea. The paper calls this is not the cultural business, but the “self-confined cripples’ money party based on the informational deceptions.” The Korean licensee who has fueled the staggering production in the US transforms to the businessmen, caster, and producer in Korea . The licensed dramatico-musical transforms to ...
What We Buy When We "Buy Now", 2016 Case Western Reserve University
What We Buy When We "Buy Now", Aaron Perzanowski, Chris Jay Hoofnagle
Aaron K. Perzanowski
The Ttab's Dangerous Dismissal Of 'Doubt', 2016 NYU School of Law
The Ttab's Dangerous Dismissal Of 'Doubt', Charles E. Colman
On September 30, 2013, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a troubling decision in In re Bottega Veneta Int’l S.a.r.l. Viewed in a broader context, the decision reflects the Board’s growing reluctance to apply the doctrine of “aesthetic functionality” in ex parte prosecution proceedings to bar the issuance of potentially anticompetitive trade-dress registrations. The TTAB gives its imprimatur to the dubious “trade dress” at issue in Bottega Veneta through procedural tactics whose novelty and import have gone largely unacknowledged — specifically, (1) the Board’s declaration of its intention to resolve “doubts” as to aesthetic ...
Post-Kirtsaeng, 'Material Differences' Between Copyright And Trademark Law's Treatment Of Gray Goods Persist, Charles E. Colman
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons would seem no trivial event for stakeholders in content-reliant industries. The upshot of the Court’s decision — that the Copyright Act cannot be used to prevent the unauthorized importation of copies of works, even if manufactured abroad, whose “first sale” has already occurred — will, at least initially, throw a wrench into many companies’ existing business models.
As one would expect, commentary on the decision has been extensive. With few exceptions, however, commentators attempting to predict the impact of Kirtsaeng have not looked beyond copyright law to ...
Design And Deviance: Patent As Symbol, Rhetoric As Metric (Parts 1 And 2), 2016 NYU School of Law
Design And Deviance: Patent As Symbol, Rhetoric As Metric (Parts 1 And 2), Charles E. Colman
This project, initially published as a two-part series of articles entitled 'Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric,' reveals the unrecognized power of gender and sexuality norms in the deep discourse of pivotal American case law on design patents.
In Part 1, I argue that late nineteenth-century cultural developments in the urban Northeast gave rise to a stigma surrounding the "ornamental" and "decorative" works under the then-exclusive purview of design-patent protection. Among the politically dominant segments of American society, the creation, appreciation, and consumption of design "for its own sake" grew increasingly intertwined with notions of decadence, effeminacy ...
Localizing Intellectual Property In The Globalization Epoch: The Integration Of Indigenous Knowledge, 2016 Dalhousie University
Localizing Intellectual Property In The Globalization Epoch: The Integration Of Indigenous Knowledge, Chidi Oguamanam
No abstract provided.
Knowledge & Innovation In Africa: Scenarios For The Future, 2016 University of Ottawa
Knowledge & Innovation In Africa: Scenarios For The Future, Jeremy De Beer, Shirin Elahi, Dick Kawooya, Chidi Oguamanam, Nagla Rizk
No abstract provided.
How To Sidestep Saying “See Ya Real Soon” To The Public Domain: Using Droit D’Auteur To Justify A Trademark-Favored Treatment Of Mickey Mouse, Laura Jacobs
Boston College International and Comparative Law Review
Mickey Mouse is one of the most recognizable characters in the world, but this famous character will be passing into the public domain when his copyright expires in 2024. The Walt Disney Company also has registered Mickey Mouse as a trademark. Thus, when Mickey passes into the public domain, an interesting conflict between copyright and trademark law will arise, and it is unclear which area of intellectual property law should determine the protections, if any, afforded to Mickey. France’s droit d’auteur, or “author’s rights,” offers a possible solution: when an author’s exploitation rights expire, the author ...
Who Gets Paid? Section 365(N) Royalty Payments Under "Zombie Licenses" After A Sale Of Ip, 2016 University of Kentucky
Who Gets Paid? Section 365(N) Royalty Payments Under "Zombie Licenses" After A Sale Of Ip, Christopher G. Bradley
This short article discusses the Bankruptcy Code's unusual treatment of certain intellectual property licenses. First, it gives a brief overview of § 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. It then provides a short analysis of a difficult but important question: If a licensee of a debtor’s intellectual property opts to retain its license rights under § 365(n), who should receive the stream of licensing payments in the event that the IP is sold: the buyer of the IP, or the debtor in bankruptcy? The answer that has emerged in some of the case law is somewhat surprising -- after providing ...
A La Recherche Du “Sens” Perdu: Copyrightable Creativity Deconstructed, 2016 Pace University
A La Recherche Du “Sens” Perdu: Copyrightable Creativity Deconstructed, Thomas M. Byron
Pace Law Review
The primary goal of this article is to show how the concept of “creativity” as defined and applied by courts in copyright cases fails to map any reasonable concept of creativity in certain critical respects. Accordingly, the first charge undertaken here is a deconstructive one—to show the lack of meaningful overlap between the legal definition of creativity and the “actual” meanings of that same term. To undertake this comparison, Part II of this Article focuses on perhaps the more easily determined of these two definitions of the term—“creativity” as defined by courts. Rather than giving an unduly ...
Forum Selling And Domain-Name Disputes, 2016 USC Law School
Forum Selling And Domain-Name Disputes, Daniel M. Klerman
University of Southern California Legal Studies Working Paper Series
The system for resolving domain-name disputes is unique in that it gives the complainant, a trademark owner who claims that a domain name violates its mark, the unilateral ability to choose the arbitration provider. As a result, providers, whether motivated by profit or prestige, have incentives to favor the complainant. Empirical analysis confirms that complainants choose providers who are more likely to decide cases for the trademark owner, rather than based on speed. The domain name-dispute resolution system should be modified to allow both complainant trademark owner and respondent domain-name registrant to strike an equal number of arbitration providers. This ...
Research Impact Of Paywalled Versus Open Access Papers, 2016 Science-Metrix and 1science
Research Impact Of Paywalled Versus Open Access Papers, Éric Archambault, Grégoire Côté, Brooke Struck, Matthieu Voorons
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
This note presents data from the 1science OAIndx on the average of relative citations (ARC) for 3.3 million papers published from 2007 to 2009 and indexed in the Web of Science (WoS). These data show a decidedly large citation advantage for open access (OA) papers, despite them suffering from a lag in availability compared to paywalled papers.
There is an abundant literature on the citation advantage of OA papers, starting with a succinct communication by Lawrence (2001). Several studies have been listed by SPARC, the majority of which support the idea that when papers are openly available, they are ...
Doctrinal Quandaries With 3d Printing And Intellectual Property, 2016 Campbell University School of Law
Doctrinal Quandaries With 3d Printing And Intellectual Property, Lucas S. Osborn
Lucas S. Osborn
No abstract provided.
Comment To The Sec In Support Of The Enhanced Disclosure Of Patent And Technology License Information, 2016 Santa Clara University School of Law
Comment To The Sec In Support Of The Enhanced Disclosure Of Patent And Technology License Information, Colleen Chien, Jorge L. Contreras, Carol Corrado, Stuart Graham, Deepak Hegde, Arti K. Rai, Saurabh Vishnubhakat
Historical and Topical Legal Documents
Intangible assets like IP constitute a large share of the value of firms, and the US economy generally. Accurate information on the intellectual property (IP) holdings and transactions of publicly-traded firms facilitates price discovery in the market and reduces transaction costs. While public understanding of the innovation economy has been expanded by a large stream of empirical research using patent data, and more recently trademark information this research is only as good as the accuracy and completeness of the data it builds upon. In contrast with information about patents and trademarks, good information about IP licensing is much less publicly ...
"Transplanting" Organ Donors With Printers: The Legal And Ethical Implications Of Manufacturing Organs, 2016 University of Akron
"Transplanting" Organ Donors With Printers: The Legal And Ethical Implications Of Manufacturing Organs, Katherine A. Smith
Akron Law Review
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is no longer restricted to simple inanimate objects; that conjecture is a thing of the past. With advancements in many areas of science, living tissues and organs can now be printed through a technique called 3D bioprinting. This technology could potentially save the lives of the 120,000 Americans in need of an organ transplant. However, whether or not a 3D bioprinted organ qualifies as a “human organ” under the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) and whether 3D bioprinted organs require federal approval could either delay or completely bar this technology’s promise. The Ninth Circuit’s ...
Curated Innovation, 2016 University of Akron
Curated Innovation, Lital Helman
Akron Law Review
The regulation of innovation-intensive industries is a critical issue for both innovation policy and regulation. In this Article, I propose a new framework to the way innovation-intensive industries are regulated.
My proposal is a four-pronged model, which I term “Curated Innovation.” In the first stage, policymakers would set a standard that would represent the outcome the regulation seeks to achieve. Second, policymakers would launch a competition, where innovative technologies or methods would race to meet the standard that was defined. Third, policymakers would select the methods or technologies that come closest to meeting the standard and create an incentive in ...
Are Universities Special?, 2016 University of Akron
Are Universities Special?, Shubha Ghosh
Akron Law Review
Universities offer a space for development of ideas, exploration of basic research, and productive outlets for creation and invention. As such, they are key to the innovation environment within which intellectual property laws operate. Although scholarship has focused on universities as institutions counter to other institutions like markets and government, less attention has been paid to universities as organizations, a site for governance through detailed rules and commonly understood norms. When understood as an organization, universities display three overlapping, but distinct models: one of pure research, one of pure commercialization, and one of public purpose. These three models together define ...
Intellectual Property Revenue Sharing As A Problem For University Technology Transfer, 2016 University of Akron
Intellectual Property Revenue Sharing As A Problem For University Technology Transfer, Jennifer Carter-Johnson
Akron Law Review
The Bayh-Dole Act, often credited with the explosion of university technology transfer, requires universities to incentivize invention disclosure by sharing the royalties generated by patent licensing with inventors. Many scholars have debated the effectiveness of university implementation of this requirement, and, indeed, the low rate of invention disclosure by academic researchers to the university is often a bottleneck in the technology-transfer process.
Unfortunately, most discussions focusing on inventor compliance with Bayh-Dole Act requirements have explored faculty-inventor motivations. However, in most cases, university inventions are joint products of a group of university members including not only faculty but also post-doctoral researchers ...
What's The Harm Of Trademark Infringement?, 2016 University of Akron
What's The Harm Of Trademark Infringement?, Rebecca Tushnet
Akron Law Review
Over the course of the twentieth century, judges came to accept trademark owners’ arguments that any kind of consumer confusion over their relationship to some other producer caused them actionable harm. Changes in the law of remedies, however, have recently led some courts to question these harm stories. This Article argues for even more attention to trademark’s theories of harm; a clear-eyed look at the marketing literature, as well as the facts of particular cases, indicates that confusion about non-competing products is often harmless.
Toward A System Of Invention Registration: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2016 University of Iowa College of Law
Toward A System Of Invention Registration: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Jason Rantanen, Lee Petherbridge
The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) represents the most significant legislative event affecting patent law and practice in more than half a century. In addressing the AIA, scholars and policymakers have focused with an almost laser-like exclusivity on the AIA’s imposition of a first-to-file-or-first-to-publicly-disclose system, which replaces an over 200-year-old first-to-invent tradition. This myopia, we suggest, overlooks a part of the AIA that could hold a substantially greater potential to jeopardize American innovation, job creation, and economic competitiveness: the imposition of a mechanism for supplemental examination.