Boston College Law School
Barry University School of Law
University of Missouri School of Law
College of William & Mary Law School
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Pepperdine University
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Access To Communication In United States Prisons: Reducing Recidivism Through Expanded Communication Programs With Inmates,
2016
University of Puget Sound
Access To Communication In United States Prisons: Reducing Recidivism Through Expanded Communication Programs With Inmates, Lilie Gross
Politics & Government Undergraduate Theses
The need for better communication systems in prisons is dire and will reduce recidivism rates in the United States. Not only is communication via phone lines extremely expensive and corrupt, it is almost impossible. Inmates in United States Prisons need this availability and option to communicate with their families and maintain outside relationships. While maintaining healthy and positive relationships is good for inmate's mental health, it also decreases the risk of recidivism. This paper aims to highlight the benefits of phone communication and relationships between inmates and family on the outside for it will decrease the 50% recidivism rate ...
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?,
2016
Charles Darwin University School of Law
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Grand Theory Or Discrete Proposal? Religious Accommodations And Health Related Harms,
2016
Lewis & Clark Law School
Grand Theory Or Discrete Proposal? Religious Accommodations And Health Related Harms, James M. Oleske Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
More than a quarter-century has passed since the Supreme Court decided in Employment Division v. Smith that religious accommodations are primarily a matter of legislative grace, not constitutional right. In that time, barrels of ink have been spilled over the merits of the Smith decision. But comparatively little attention has been given to the issue of how legislatures and other political actors should exercise their discretion to grant or deny specific religious accommodations. In their article To Accommodate or Not to Accommodate: (When) Should the State Regulate Religion to Protect the Rights of Children and Third Parties?, Professor Hillel Levin ...
Rlupia And The Limits Of Religious Institutionalism,
2016
University of Kentucky
Rlupia And The Limits Of Religious Institutionalism, Zachary A. Bray
Zachary Bray
What special protections, if any, should religious organizations receive from local land use controls? The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”)—a deeply flawed statute—has been a magnet for controversy since its passage in 2000. Yet until recently, RLUIPA has played little role in debates about “religious institutionalism,” a set of ideas that suggest religious institutions play a distinctive role in developing the framework for religious liberty and that they deserve comparably distinctive deference and protection. This is starting to change: RLUIPA’s magnetic affinity for controversy has begun to connect conflicts over religious land use with ...
The "Permeation" Issue In Federal Aid To Education,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
The "Permeation" Issue In Federal Aid To Education, George E. Reed
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
The School Prayer Case - The Dilemma,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
The School Prayer Case - The Dilemma, William B. Ball
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Wikileaks And The Institutional Framework For National Security Disclosures,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Wikileaks And The Institutional Framework For National Security Disclosures, Patricia L. Bellia
Patricia L. Bellia
WikiLeaks’ successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers’ decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks’ defenders. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm.
The lessons of the Pentagon Papers case for ...
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Richard W Garnett
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law,” delivered by Prof. Andrew Koppelman at a conference, “The Competing Claims of Law and Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?”, which was held at Pepperdine University in February of 2012. In this response, it is suggested – among other things – that “American religious neutrality” is, as Koppelman argues, “coherent and attractive” because and to the extent that it is not neutral with respect to the goal and good of religious freedom.
Religious freedom, in the American tradition, is not what ...
Law, Religion, And Politics: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State,
2016
University of Notre Dame Law School
Law, Religion, And Politics: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State, Richard Garnett
Richard W Garnett
Professor Richard Garnett, of University of Notre Dame Law School, presented on the topic Law, Religion, and Politics: Understanding the Separation of Church and State. This workshop was presented as part of the Hesburgh Lecture Series through the Alumni & Friends of University of Notre Dame and was co-sponsored by the Notre Dame Alumni Club of Miami. This workshop examined how to understand the Constitution's "separation of church and state" and what it requires of religious believers and institutions.
Common Schools And The Common Good: Reflections On The School-Choice Debate,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Common Schools And The Common Good: Reflections On The School-Choice Debate, Richard W. Garnett
Richard W Garnett
No abstract provided.
Changing Minds: Proselytism, Freedom, And The First Amendment,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Changing Minds: Proselytism, Freedom, And The First Amendment, Richard W. Garnett
Richard W Garnett
Proselytism is, as Paul Griffiths has observed, a topic enjoying renewed attention in recent years. What's more, the practice, aims, and effects of proselytism are increasingly framed not merely in terms of piety and zeal; they are seen as matters of geopolitical, cultural, and national-security significance as well. Indeed, it is fair to say that one of today's more pressing challenges is the conceptual and practical tangle of religious liberty, free expression, cultural integrity, and political stability. This essay is an effort to unravel that tangle by drawing on the religious-freedom-related work and teaching of the late Pope ...
Recent Decision Note,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Obscenity In The Supreme Court: A Note On Jacobellis V. Ohio,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Obscenity In The Supreme Court: A Note On Jacobellis V. Ohio, Joseph O'Meara, Thomas L. Shaffer
Thomas L. Shaffer
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Good Reason For Secrecy On 38 Studios 8/12/2016,
2016
Roger Williams University
Newsroom: Good Reason For Secrecy On 38 Studios 8/12/2016, Niki Kuckes, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Is Hobby Lobby Worse For Religious Liberty Than Smith?,
2016
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Is Hobby Lobby Worse For Religious Liberty Than Smith?, Andrew Koppelman, Frederick M. Gedicks
University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Populizing Religious Liberty And Hobby Lobby,
2016
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Populizing Religious Liberty And Hobby Lobby, Erick G. Kaardal
University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Obscenity In The Mails; Privileged Communications; The Law Against Contraceptives; The Rights Of Prisoners,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
Obscenity In The Mails; Privileged Communications; The Law Against Contraceptives; The Rights Of Prisoners
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Note: Compulsory Medical Treatment For Minors And Religious Freedom,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
Note: Compulsory Medical Treatment For Minors And Religious Freedom
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
The Vow Of Poverty And Its Civil Law Implications,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
The Vow Of Poverty And Its Civil Law Implications, Romaeus W. O'Brien, O. Carm.
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Survey Of A Decade Of Decisions On The Law Of Obscenity,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
Survey Of A Decade Of Decisions On The Law Of Obscenity, John Cornelius Hayes
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
