Expanding The Slayer Rule In Florida: Why Elder Abuse Should Trigger Disinheritance, 2017 Barry University School of Law
Expanding The Slayer Rule In Florida: Why Elder Abuse Should Trigger Disinheritance, Natasa Glisic
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Method In Fiduciary Law's Mixed Messages, 2017 William & Mary Law School
The Method In Fiduciary Law's Mixed Messages, Evan J. Criddle
No abstract provided.
Tomorrow's Inheritance: The Frontiers Of Estate Planning Formalism, 2017 University of California, Davis, School of Law
Tomorrow's Inheritance: The Frontiers Of Estate Planning Formalism, David Horton
Boston College Law Review
The rules that govern the creation of an estate plan are in flux. Courts once demanded strict adherence to the Wills Act. Yet, this legacy of hyper-vigilance is waning, as the Uniform Probate Code, the Restatement (Third) of Property, and ten states have adopted the harmless error rule. Meanwhile, trusts, which need not comply with the Wills Act, have eclipsed wills as the dominant method of posthumous wealth transmission. This Article explores three budding topics that threaten to further complicate this area. First, there are anecdotal accounts of decedents trying to make electronic wills. In both strict compliance and harmless ...
Freedom Of Inheritance, 2017 University of Wyoming College of Law
Freedom Of Inheritance, Mark Glover
Utah Law Review
The law grants individuals the broad freedom of disposition to decide how their property should be distributed upon death. The rationale underlying freedom of disposition is that the choices of individual donors produce results that maximize social welfare. Policymakers are rightfully skeptical that they can craft a mandatory estate plan that fits all situations or that probate courts can consistently and accurately assess the merits of particular dispositions of property. By contrast, the donor is in the best position to evaluate her own specific circumstances and to place property in the hands of the donees who will benefit the most ...
How Many #Followers Do You Have?: Evaluating The Rise Of Social Media And Issues Concerning In Re Ctli’S Determination That Social Media Accounts Are Property Of The Estate, 2017 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
How Many #Followers Do You Have?: Evaluating The Rise Of Social Media And Issues Concerning In Re Ctli’S Determination That Social Media Accounts Are Property Of The Estate, Patricia A. Leeson
Catholic University Law Review
With the rise of social media use, legal disputes have surfaced with litigants looking to the courts to determine issues of ownership and legal authority. As a matter of first impression, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Texas held that a Twitter and Facebook social media account were to be regarded as property of the estate pursuant to Section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code. The court analogized the social media accounts to subscriber lists because they provide valuable access to customers. Although the court addressed the question of whether social media applications are to be regarded as property in bankruptcy ...
Video: Elder Law For Beginners, 2017 Nova Southeastern University
Video: Elder Law For Beginners, Arlene Lakin, Gail Fisher
Law Center Plus Seminar Series
This particular seminar is designed to educate attorneys about how to be an elder law attorney. Practitioners will learn the various skill sets involved: estate and incapacity planning as well as protection of assets in order to qualify for, or remain qualified for, public benefits such as Medicaid and veteran’s pension with aid and attendance.
1. How to work with senior citizens and their families in a clinical as well as legal format
2. How to determine capacity of elderly clients to execute legal documents
3. How to analyze family relationships
4. How to design an estate and incapacity ...
In Re Frei Irrevocable Trust, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 8 (Mar. 2, 2017), 2017 Nevada Law Journal
In Re Frei Irrevocable Trust, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 8 (Mar. 2, 2017), Angela Lee
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It held trusts are modifiable by a settlor and beneficiary as long as any non-consenting beneficiaries' interests are not prejudiced.
Liberty And Community In Marriage: Expanding On Massey’S Proposal For A Community Property Option In New Hampshire, 2017 University of New Hampshire
Liberty And Community In Marriage: Expanding On Massey’S Proposal For A Community Property Option In New Hampshire, Jo Carrillo
University of New Hampshire Law Review
This article argues that intimate partners should have the right to adopt a sharing economy within marriage. Forty-one U.S. states employ a separate property regime for property acquired during marriage; of these, only two allow married couples to opt out of the separate property system and hold their assets as community property. Nine U.S. states are community property states. To encourage equal partnership in marriage, Calvin Massey proposed that New Hampshire, a separate property state, enable a community property option. This essay expands on Massey’s proposal by comparing it to three other marriage reform proposals: two based ...
The Disposition Of Human Remains And Organ Donation: Increasing Testamentary Freedom While Upholding The No Property Rule, Louise M. Mimnagh
Western Journal of Legal Studies
In terms of real and personal property, Canadian law grants individuals substantial testamentary freedom in the disposition of their estate. However, in regards to human remains, Ontario has upheld the common law’s longstanding “No Property Rule,” which prevents testamentary freedom in regards to one’s bodily remains. In light of changing societal notions of property and value with respect to the human body, this article argues in favour of implementing greater testamentary freedom for individuals in regards to the disposition of their body, organs, tissue, and fluids. This article reviews alternative approaches to the testamentary disposition of human remains ...
Estate Of Purdue: A Blueprint For Flping, 2017 Florida A&M University College of Law
Estate Of Purdue: A Blueprint For Flping, Phyllis C. Taite
In this article, Taite examines Estate of Purdue, in which the Tax Court held that assets of the decedent that were transferred to the family limited liability company were not includable in the gross estate, that transfers to the family trust qualified for an annual exclusion, and that the estate could deduct interest on loans from the estate’s beneficiaries.
The Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll's Will: A Tale Of Testamentary Capacity, 2017 Texas A&M University School of Law
The Strange Case Of Dr. Jekyll's Will: A Tale Of Testamentary Capacity, Stephen R. Alton
Robert Louis Stevenson’s classic novella, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, published in 1886, is the well-known tale of a respected scientist (Dr. Henry Jekyll) who transforms himself into an evil-doer (Mr. Edward Hyde). While the work raises issues of tort and criminal liability, this article analyzes the legal issues presented by one particular and crucial plot device that Stevenson employs—the last will of Dr. Jekyll. This will so obsesses Jekyll’s friend and solicitor, Gabriel John Utterson (through whose eyes the story unfolds), that he is impelled to seek the truth behind his friend ...
Estate Of Holliday: "Flping" The Script, 2017 Florida A&M University College of Law
Estate Of Holliday: "Flping" The Script, Phyllis C. Taite
In this article, Taite examines Estate of Holliday, in which the Tax Court held that the full value of property transferred to a family limited partnership was properly includable in the decedent’s estate because the decedent had a retained right in the property and no significant nontax reasons for making the transfer.
A Chinese Inheritance, 2016 University of South Dakota School of Law
A Chinese Inheritance, Thomas E. Simmons
Thomas E. Simmons
In States We "Trust": Self-Settled Trusts, Public Policy, And Interstate Federalism, 2016 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
In States We "Trust": Self-Settled Trusts, Public Policy, And Interstate Federalism, Brendan Duffy
Northwestern University Law Review
Over the last twenty years, domestic asset protection trusts have risen in popularity as a means of estate planning and asset protection. A domestic asset protection trust is an irrevocable trust formed under state law which enables an independent trustee to allocate money to a class of
persons, which includes the settlor.
Since Alaska first enacted domestic asset protection legislation in 1997, fifteen states have followed its lead. The case law over the last twenty years addressing these trust mechanisms has, however, been surprisingly sparse. A Washington bankruptcy court decision, In re Huber, altered this drought, but caused more confusion ...
The Development Of The Wife's Cause Of Action For Loss Of Consortium, 2016 St. John's University School of Law
The Development Of The Wife's Cause Of Action For Loss Of Consortium
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Planned Parenthood: Adult Adoption And The Right Of Adoptees To Inherit, 2016 University of Kentucky College of Law
Planned Parenthood: Adult Adoption And The Right Of Adoptees To Inherit, Richard C. Ausness
Richard C. Ausness
This Article is concerned with the effect of adult adoptions on the inheritance rights (in the broad sense of that term) of adult adoptees. The Article contends many adult adoption statutes assume the existence of a parent-child relationship in which the adopter is the “parent” and the adoptee is a “child” even though this is not true of all adult adoption cases. In addition, legislatures and courts frequently fail to differentiate between “quasi-familial” adoptions and “strategic” adoptions, particularly where inheritance rights are concerned.
Moving Forward By Looking Back: The Retroactive Application Of Obergefell, 2016 University of Florida Levin College of Law
Moving Forward By Looking Back: The Retroactive Application Of Obergefell, Lee-Ford Tritt
UF Law Faculty Publications
The recent Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. Hodges has forever altered American jurisprudence. Not only did this decision make same-sex marriage legal in all fifty states, but it also required states to recognize same-sex marriages from other states in accordance with the 14th Amendment. The Court’s holding in Obergefell raises a fundamental question with serious legal and financial significance: when exactly do these once unrecognized marriages legally begin? And to what extent must courts apply Obergefell retroactively? The stakes are high and substantive financial effects are pending on the answer to this question — for, with marriage, comes wide-ranging ...
The "Estate Planning" Interviewer, 2016 Notre Dame Law School
The "Estate Planning" Interviewer, Thomas L. Shaffer
Thomas L. Shaffer
Professor Shaffer's article The "Estate Planning" Interviewer is the Introduction: Part II, in J.K. Lasser's Estate Tax Techniques on pages INT-25 to INT-51
Toward Economic Analysis Of The Uniform Probate Code, 2016 Notre Dame Law School
Toward Economic Analysis Of The Uniform Probate Code, Daniel B. Kelly
Daniel B Kelly
Insights from economics and the economic analysis of law may be useful in analyzing succession law, including intestacy and wills as well as nonprobate transfers such as trusts. After surveying prior works that have examined succession from a functional perspective, I explore the possibility of utilizing tools like (i) transaction costs, (ii) the ex ante/ex post distinction, and (iii) rules versus standards, to illuminate the design of the Uniform Probate Code. Specifically, I investigate how these tools, which legal scholars have employed widely in other contexts, may be relevant in understanding events like the nonprobate revolution and issues like ...
The Will As An Implied Unilateral Arbitration Contract, 2016 University of Florida Levin College of Law
The Will As An Implied Unilateral Arbitration Contract, E. Gary Spitko
Florida Law Review
A consensus has begun to develop in the case law, the academic commentary, and the statutory reform movement that a testator’s provision in her will mandating arbitration of any challenge to the will should not be enforceable against a beneficiary who has not agreed to the arbitration provision, at least where the will contestant, by his contest, seeks to increase his inheritance outside the will. Grounding this consensus is the widespread understanding that a will is not a contract. This Article seeks to challenge both the understanding that a will is not a contract and the opposition to enforcement ...