Measuring Benchmark Damages In Antitrust Litigation, 2013 Berkeley Law
Measuring Benchmark Damages In Antitrust Litigation, Daniel Rubinfeld, Justin Mccrary
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
We compare the two dominant approaches to estimation of benchmark damages in antitrust litigation, the forecasting approach and the dummy variable approach. We give conditions under which the two approaches are equivalent and present the results of a small simulation study.
Jurisprudenta In Materia Concurentei. Obligatia De A Solicita O Hotarare Preliminara., 2013 Lund University
Jurisprudenta In Materia Concurentei. Obligatia De A Solicita O Hotarare Preliminara., Emanuela Matei
Emanuela A. Matei
No abstract provided.
Ending Patent Exceptionalism & Structuring The Rule Of Reason: The Supreme Court Opens The Door For Both, 2013 University of California, Hastings
Ending Patent Exceptionalism & Structuring The Rule Of Reason: The Supreme Court Opens The Door For Both, Robin C. Feldman
Robin C Feldman
Is There A Market For Organic Search Engine Results And Can Their Manipulation Give Rise To Antitrust Liability?, 2013 Berkeley Law
Is There A Market For Organic Search Engine Results And Can Their Manipulation Give Rise To Antitrust Liability?, Daniel L. Rubinfeld, James Ratliff
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
Google has been accused of manipulating its organic search results to favor its own services. We explore possible choices of relevant antitrust markets that might make these various antitrust allegations meaningful. We argue that viewing Internet search in isolation ignores the two-sided nature of the search-advertising platform and the feedback effects that link the provision of organic search results to consumers on the one hand, and the sale to businesses of advertising on the other. We conclude that the relevant market in which Google competes with respect to Internet search is at least as broad as a two-sided search-advertising market. …
Antitrust Settlements, 2013 Berkeley Law
Antitrust Settlements, Daniel L. Rubinfeld
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
The Hidden Costs Of Free Goods: Implications For Antitrust Enforcement, 2013 University of Haifa
The Hidden Costs Of Free Goods: Implications For Antitrust Enforcement, Michal Gal, Daniel Rubinfeld
Michal Gal
Today a growing number of goods and services are provided in the marketplace free of charge; indeed, free or the appearance of free, have become part of our ecosystem. More often than not, free goods and services provide real benefits to consumers and are clearly pro-competitive. Yet free goods may also create significant costs. We show that despite the fact that the consumer does not pay a direct price, there are indirect prices that reflect the opportunity cost associated with the consumption of free goods. These indirect costs can be overt or covert, in the same market in which the …
Measuring Benchmark Damages In Antitrust Litigation, 2013 Berkeley Law
Measuring Benchmark Damages In Antitrust Litigation, Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Justin Mccrary
Justin McCrary
We compare the two dominant approaches to estimation of benchmark damages in antitrust litigation, the forecasting approach and the dummy variable approach. We give conditions under which the two approaches are equivalent and present the results of a small simulation study.
Network Nepotism And The Market For Content Delivery, 2013 Berkeley Law
Network Nepotism And The Market For Content Delivery, Tejas N. Narechania
Tejas N. Narechania
Sacred Cows, Holy Wars: Exploring The Limits Of Law In The Regulation Of Raw Milk And Kosher Meat, 2013 University of Baltimore
Sacred Cows, Holy Wars: Exploring The Limits Of Law In The Regulation Of Raw Milk And Kosher Meat, Kenneth Lasson
Kenneth Lasson
SACRED COWS, HOLY WARS Exploring the Limits of Law in the Regulation of Raw Milk and Kosher Meat By Kenneth Lasson Abstract In a free society law and religion seldom coincide comfortably, tending instead to reflect the inherent tension that often resides between the two. This is nowhere more apparent than in America, where the underlying principle upon which the first freedom enunciated by the Constitution’s Bill of Rights is based ‒ the separation of church and state – is conceptually at odds with the pragmatic compromises that may be reached. But our adherence to the primacy of individual rights …
The Innovation Commons, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
The Innovation Commons, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This book of CASES AND MATERIALS ON INNOVATION AND COMPETITION POLICY is intended for educational use. The book is free for all to use subject to an open source license agreement. It differs from IP/antitrust casebooks in that it considers numerous sources of competition policy in addition to antitrust, including those that emanate from the intellectual property laws themselves, and also related issues such as the relationship between market structure and innovation, the competitive consequences of regulatory rules governing technology competition such as net neutrality and interconnection, misuse, the first sale doctrine, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Chapters …
Distributive Justice And Consumer Welfare In Antitrust, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Distributive Justice And Consumer Welfare In Antitrust, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
The dominant view of antitrust policy in the United States is that it is intended to promote some version of economic welfare. More specifically, antitrust promotes allocative efficiency by ensuring that markets are as competitive as they can practicably be, and that firms do not face unreasonable roadblocks to attaining productive efficiency, which refers to both cost minimization and innovation.
The distribution concern that has dominated debates over United States antitrust policy over the last several decades is whether antitrust should adopt a “consumer welfare” principle rather than a more general neoclassical “total welfare” principle. In The Antitrust Paradox Robert …
Patent Exclusions And Antitrust After Therasense, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Patent Exclusions And Antitrust After Therasense, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
A patent may be held invalid if it was obtained by “inequitable conduct” before the PTO during the process of patent prosecution. In its Therasense decision the Federal Circuit imposed severe requirements against those attempting to defend against a patent on the basis of inequitable conduct, insisting that inequitable conduct be measured essentially by a subjective test. Objective “reasonable person” tests such as negligence or even gross negligence will not suffice. By contrast, the Supreme Court has insisted that the conduct giving rise to a wrongful infringement action violating the antitrust laws be initially based on an objective test – …
Competition For Innovation, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Competition For Innovation, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Both antitrust and IP law are limited and imperfect instruments for regulating innovation. The problems include high information costs and lack of sufficient knowledge, special interest capture, and the jury trial system, to name a few. More fundamentally, antitrust law and intellectual property law have looked at markets in very different ways. Further, over the last three decades antitrust law has undergone a reformation process that has made it extremely self conscious about its goals. While the need for such reform is at least as apparent in patent and copyright law, very little true reform has actually occurred.
Antitrust has …
Joe Bauer Presented "Enforcement Issues Under American Antitrust Laws" At The University Of Tilburg (Holland) Center For Law And Economics On December 19, 2013, 2013 Notre Dame Law School
Joe Bauer Presented "Enforcement Issues Under American Antitrust Laws" At The University Of Tilburg (Holland) Center For Law And Economics On December 19, 2013, Joseph P. Bauer
Faculty Lectures and Presentations
Joe Bauer presented a seminar at the University of Tilburg (Holland) Center for Law and Economics on December 19. His topic was Enforcement Issues under American Antitrust Laws. View PowerPoint slides of lecture by clicking pdf link.
"Apple Vs. Samsung: Three Possible Outcomes" (Quotes: Mark Mckenna) Cnn Money, 2013 Notre Dame Law School
"Apple Vs. Samsung: Three Possible Outcomes" (Quotes: Mark Mckenna) Cnn Money, Mark Mckenna
Mark P. McKenna
Apple vs. Samsung: Three possible outcomes article by David Goldman quotes: Mark McKenna in CNN Money on Aug 24, 2012.
"I have been surprised that Samsung seems to have been on the defensive so much," said Mark McKenna, a law professor and intellectual property specialist at the University of Notre Dame.
Mark Mckenna Quoted In The Mac News World Article "Apple Breaks Legal Serve In Samsung’S Home Court.", 2013 Notre Dame Law School
Mark Mckenna Quoted In The Mac News World Article "Apple Breaks Legal Serve In Samsung’S Home Court.", Mark Mckenna
Mark P. McKenna
Mark McKenna was quoted in the Mac News World article Apple Breaks Legal Serve in Samsung’s Home Court on December 13. "Neither of these companies wants to give an inch because the cumulative effect of these cases is to make it as difficult on each other as possible," Mark McKenna, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, told MacNewsWorld.
A Propósito De Un Elemento Esencial De La Defensa De La Competencia En Europa: Las Facultades De Investigación De La Comisión En Materia De Inspección (About An Essential Element Of The European Antitrust: Commission Investigation Faculties Of Inspection), 2013 Universidad Externado de Colombia
A Propósito De Un Elemento Esencial De La Defensa De La Competencia En Europa: Las Facultades De Investigación De La Comisión En Materia De Inspección (About An Essential Element Of The European Antitrust: Commission Investigation Faculties Of Inspection), Jesús Alfonso Soto Pineda
Jesús Alfonso Soto Pineda
En base a la prolongación de las facultades de investigación que le han sido proporcionadas a la Comisión Europea para combatir la existencia de acuerdos colusorios en el ámbito comunitario, el presente artículo expone las condiciones en las cuales el poder percibido con mayor sensibilidad desde el terreno empresarial, la inspección, debe ser puesto en marcha por la máxima autoridad comunitaria de competencia, analizando en detalle la contradicción natural que se presenta entre los objetivos propios de la inspección y dos postulados básicos relacionados con el derecho de defensa, como lo son el secreto profesional y el derecho a guardar …
Policing The Firm, 2013 University of Florida Levin College of Law
Policing The Firm, D. Daniel Sokol
UF Law Faculty Publications
Criminal price fixing cartels are a serious problem for consumers. Cartels are hard both to find and punish. Research into other kinds of corporate wrongdoing suggests that enforcers should pay increased attention to incentives within the firm to deter wrongdoing. Thus far, antitrust scholarship and policy have ignored this insight in the cartel context. This Article suggests how to improve antitrust enforcement by focusing enforcement efforts on changing the incentives of internal firm compliance.
Anticompetitive Patent Settlements And The Supreme Court's Actavis Decision, 2013 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Anticompetitive Patent Settlements And The Supreme Court's Actavis Decision, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
In FTC v. Actavis the Supreme Court held that settlement of a patent infringement suit in which the patentee of a branded pharmaceutical drug pays a generic infringer to stay out of the market may be illegal under the antitrust laws. Justice Breyer's majority opinion was surprisingly broad, in two critical senses. First, he spoke with a generality that reached far beyond the pharmaceutical generic drug disputes that have provoked numerous pay-for-delay settlements.
Second was the aggressive approach that the Court chose. The obvious alternatives were the rule that prevailed in most Circuits, that any settlement is immune from antitrust …
The Role Of Monopolization And Abuse Of Dominance In Competition Law, 2013 Prof. & Dir., Inst. For Consumer Antitrust Studies, Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Role Of Monopolization And Abuse Of Dominance In Competition Law, Spencer Weber Waller
Spencer Weber Waller
No abstract provided.