Guns, Gender, Geography: Exploring Reasons For Gun Ownership, 2016 Georgia Southern University
Guns, Gender, Geography: Exploring Reasons For Gun Ownership, Lauren N. Kadet
Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This study was aimed to depict patterns of gun ownership in the United States and to outline the reasons for gun ownership and the influential variables associated with people’s reasons for owning handguns and long guns. This study used data derived from the 2004 National Firearm Survey to examine how respondents’ geographic region of residency, gender, race, age, rural location and education level influenced the likelihood of, and reasons for owning a firearm. The findings from this study suggest that being a male, living in the south and participants’ age was significant in determining the likelihood of participants owning a …
Trending @ Rwu Law: Carl Bogus's Post: 'Should We Be Afraid? Absolutely. But Not Only Of Crazed Jihadists...', 2015 Roger Williams University School of LAw
Trending @ Rwu Law: Carl Bogus's Post: 'Should We Be Afraid? Absolutely. But Not Only Of Crazed Jihadists...', Carl Bogus
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
The Second Amendment Is Not Absolute, 2015 University of Georgia School of Law
The Second Amendment Is Not Absolute, Sonja R. West
Popular Media
This article written at Slate.com on December 7, 2015 explains that like many other constitutional rights, the right to possess firearms in the 2nd Amendment, may be regulated by Congress.
Hunting And The Second Amendment, 2015 Duke Law School
Hunting And The Second Amendment, Joseph Blocher
Notre Dame Law Review
Debates about the meaning and scope of the Second Amendment have traditionally focused on whether it protects the keeping and bearing of arms for self-defense, prevention of tyranny, maintenance of the militia, or some combination of those three things. But roughly half of American gun-owners identify hunting or sport shooting as their primary reason for owning a gun. And while much public rhetoric suggests that these activities fall within the scope of the Second Amendment, some of the most committed gun-rights advocates insist that the Amendment “ain’t about hunting” and that, no matter their heritage and value, such activities are …
The Law Book: From Hammurabi To The International Criminal Court, 250 Milestones In The History Of Law (Sterling), 2015 New York Law School
The Law Book: From Hammurabi To The International Criminal Court, 250 Milestones In The History Of Law (Sterling), Michael Roffer
Books
The Law Book explores 250 of the most significant legal issues, cases, trials, and events that have profoundly changed our world. Although the heaviest emphasis is on American law it also touches on more than a dozen countries and the European Union, laws relating to Antarctica and Outer Space, and principles of international law. Among the topics it explores are the earliest legal codes, the role of juries, slavery and emancipation, civil rights, Native Americans, copyright, the press and free speech, immigration, censorship and obscenity, the environment, war and international relations, war crimes and trials, the insanity defense, taxation, prohibition, …
Unenumerated Rights And The Limits Of Analogy: A Critque Of The Right To Medical Self-Defense, 2015 Notre Dame Law School
Unenumerated Rights And The Limits Of Analogy: A Critque Of The Right To Medical Self-Defense, O. Carter Snead
O. Carter Snead
Volokh’s project stands or falls with the claim that the entitlement he proposes is of constitutional dimension. If there is no fundamental right to medical self-defense, the individual must, for better or worse, yield to the regulation of this domain in the name of the values agreed to by the political branches of government. Indeed, the government routinely restricts the instrumentalities of self-help (including self-defense) in the name of avoiding what it takes to be more significant harms. This same rationale accounts for current governmental limitations on access to unapproved drugs and the current ban on organ sales. The FDA …
The Right To Remain Armed, 2015 William & Mary Law School
The Right To Remain Armed, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
The laws governing gun possession are changing rapidly. In the past two years, federal courts have wielded a revitalized Second Amendment to invalidate longstanding gun carrying restrictions in Chicago, the District of Columbia, and throughout California. Invoking similar Second Amendment themes, legislators across the country have steadily deregulated public gun carrying, preempting municipal gun control ordinances in cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Cleveland.
These changes to substantive gun laws reverberate through the constitutional criminal procedure framework. By making it lawful for citizens to carry guns even in crowded urban areas, enhanced Second Amendment rights trigger Fourth Amendment protections that could …
End The Popularity Contest: A Proposal For Second Amendment 'Type Of Weapon' Analysis, 2015 Boston University School of Law
End The Popularity Contest: A Proposal For Second Amendment 'Type Of Weapon' Analysis, Cody Jacobs
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense raised many questions about the scope and content of that right. One issue that will become increasingly important in the years ahead, but that has received relatively little attention from scholars and courts, is the question of which “arms” are protected by that right. The Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller purports to lay out a test that asks whether the weapon at issue is in “common use” at the time the case is decided. This article critiques that test, arguing that …
A Reason To Resist: The Use Of Deadly Force In Aiding Victims Of Unlawful Police Aggression, 2015 University of San Diego
A Reason To Resist: The Use Of Deadly Force In Aiding Victims Of Unlawful Police Aggression, Kindaka Sanders
San Diego Law Review
Some two and a half years before the fatal shooting of Michael Brown by a Ferguson, Missouri Police Officer, the Indiana State Legislature enacted Indiana Code § 35-41-3-2 authorizing the use of force, including deadly force against public servants acting unlawfully against the persons or property of Indiana citizens. The statute, passed in March of 2012, is the first of its kind. It was passed in reaction to the Indiana Supreme Court's decision in Barnes v. State, which abolished the common law right to resist an unlawful arrest. Gun rights groups, most notably the National Rifle Association (NRA), responded in …
Analyzing Second Amendment Challenges: Getting Strict With Judges, 2015 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Analyzing Second Amendment Challenges: Getting Strict With Judges, Lauren Dwarika
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Let’S Not Forget: We Have A State Interest To Promote, 2015 Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Let’S Not Forget: We Have A State Interest To Promote, Elias Arroyo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arming The Good Guys: School Zones And The Second Amendment, 2015 Brigham Young University Law School
Arming The Good Guys: School Zones And The Second Amendment, Grant Arnold
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., 2015 St. Mary's School of Law, Texas
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
Clearing The Smoke From The Right To Bear Arms And The Second Amendment, 2015 The University of Akron
Clearing The Smoke From The Right To Bear Arms And The Second Amendment, Anthony J. Dennis
Akron Law Review
Despite raging battles in Congress, in the press and in state legislatures over gun control, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the very source of every U.S. citizen's right to possess firearms, is one of the most ignored and overlooked parts of the American Bill of Rights. Much of what has been said about the Second Amendment is hostile to the very rights so plainly guaranteed in that provision. Law school constitutional law classes frequently study the First Amendment, "close their eyes" to the Second and move immediately on to study the Fourth Amendment. Some have speculated that …
"Your Weapons, You Will Not Need Them." Comment On The Supreme Court's Sixty-Year Silence On The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, 2015 The University of Akron
"Your Weapons, You Will Not Need Them." Comment On The Supreme Court's Sixty-Year Silence On The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, Anthony Gallia
Akron Law Review
Interpretation of the Second Amendment can be divided into two different schools of thought; individual rights theorists, and collective rights theorists. Individual rights theorists argue that the Second Amendment creates a right in every person to keep and bear arms. Collective rights theorists advance the position that the Second Amendment creates a collective right in the people as a whole. The purpose of this comment is to emphasize the controversy surrounding the Second Amendment and the need for guidance on the issue by the United States Supreme Court. Part II of this article discusses the text of the Second Amendment …
A Preliminary Consideration Of Issues Raised In The Firearms Sellers Immunity Bill, 2015 The University of Akron
A Preliminary Consideration Of Issues Raised In The Firearms Sellers Immunity Bill, Frank J. Vandall
Akron Law Review
Snipings, mass-murders by disgruntled employees, children shooting children, and a vast number of spousal murders are everyday news across the country. In the numerous lawsuits brought by individual victims and over 30 cities, it has been alleged that gun manufacturers and sellers have an important role to play in designing guns to be safer and in closely monitoring gun sales. The courts are weighing these issues and have dismissed a large number of individual and city suits for various reasons. As the Senate debates the Bill (S. 659) that shields those in the gun trade from liability, several issues need …
Questioning The Necessity Of Concealed Carry Laws, 2015 The University of Akron
Questioning The Necessity Of Concealed Carry Laws, William J. Michael
Akron Law Review
The State of Ohio recently became the thirty-seventh state to pass some form of concealed carry legislation, under which persons may carry concealed firearms. Given the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, such legislation appears unnecessary since individuals have a constitutional right to carry firearms.
In this article, I argue that the Second Amendment’s text guarantees an individual’s right (not a state’s right or a “collective” right) to keep and bear firearms. Part I of this article contains that argument. If the text is binding—and I believe it is—further analysis regarding whether the Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right …
Is Widespread Gun Ownership Worth The Price Of More Violence?, 2015 Stanford Law School
Is Widespread Gun Ownership Worth The Price Of More Violence?, John J. Donohue
John Donohue
No abstract provided.
Gonzales V. Raich: How To Fix A Mess Of "Economic" Proportions, 2015 The University of Akron
Gonzales V. Raich: How To Fix A Mess Of "Economic" Proportions, Gregory W. Watts
Akron Law Review
The Note examines the history, evolution, elements, and application of the Commerce Clause doctrine. Part II, Sections A through C, concentrate on the history of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Commerce Clause, focusing extensively on Wickard v. Filburn, which the majority in Raich held controlling, and United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison, which the dissent would have held as controlling. Part II, Sections D and E, provide an overview of the Controlled Substances Act, whose constitutionality was challenged as applied in Gonzales v. Raich, and the Compassionate Use Act of California, which led to the conflict …
Statutory Misinterpretations: Small V. United States Darkens The Already Murky Waters Of Statutory Interpretation, 2015 The University of Akron
Statutory Misinterpretations: Small V. United States Darkens The Already Murky Waters Of Statutory Interpretation, Michelle Schuld
Akron Law Review
Part II of this Note will examine the background of this issue by exploring the history and purpose of the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the circuit split arising over the interpretation of the words “any court” under § 922(g)(1). Part III will focus on Small v. United States in detail, including the underlying facts, procedural history, and majority and dissenting opinions. Part IV will analyze this decision and argue that the majority misused canons of statutory interpretation to reach an interpretation that is contrary to the plain meaning of the statute. The section will also discuss the majority’s …