Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations,
2010
Valparaiso University
Clear As Mud: How The Uncertain Precedential Status Of Unpublished Opinions Muddles Qualified Immunity Determinations, David R. Cleveland
David R. Cleveland
While unpublished opinions are now freely citeable under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, their precedential value remains uncertain. This ambiguity muddles the already unclear law surrounding qualified immunity and denies courts valuable precedents for making fair and consistent judgments on these critical civil rights issues. When faced with a claim that they have violated a person’s civil rights, government officials typically claim qualified immunity. The test is whether they have violated “clearly established law.” Unfortunately, the federal circuits differ on whether unpublished opinions may be used in determining clearly established law. This article, Clear as Mud: How the Uncertain …
Technology Convergence And Federalism: Who Should Decide The Future Of Telecommunications Regulation?,
2010
Boston College Law School
Technology Convergence And Federalism: Who Should Decide The Future Of Telecommunications Regulation?, Daniel A. Lyons
Boston College Law School Faculty Papers
This Article critically examines the division of regulatory jurisdiction over telecommunications issues between the federal government and the states. Currently, the line between federal and state jurisdiction varies depending on the service at issue. This compartmentalization might have made sense fifteen years ago, but the advent of technology convergence has largely rendered this model obsolete. Yesterday’s telephone and cable companies now compete head-to-head to offer consumers the vaunted “triple play” of voice, video, and internet services. But these telecommunications companies are finding it increasingly difficult to fit new operations into arcane, rigid regulatory compartments. Moreover, services that consumers view as …
National Jurisdiction And Global Business Networks (Earl A. Snyder Lecture In International Law),
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
National Jurisdiction And Global Business Networks (Earl A. Snyder Lecture In International Law), Hannah Buxbaum
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Earl A. Snyder Lecture in International Law, November 1, 2007, Lauterpacht Centre for International Research, University of Cambridge.
Another Blow To Tribal Sovereignty: A Look At Cross-Jurisdictional Law-Enforcement Agreements Between Indian Tribes And Local Communities,
2010
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Another Blow To Tribal Sovereignty: A Look At Cross-Jurisdictional Law-Enforcement Agreements Between Indian Tribes And Local Communities, Andrew G. Hill
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Preemption: A Roadmap For The Application Of Tribal Law In State Courts,
2010
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Federal Preemption: A Roadmap For The Application Of Tribal Law In State Courts, Jackie Gardina
American Indian Law Review
This article contends that state courts are not necessarily free to apply state law when the courts are exercising concurrent adjudicative jurisdiction with tribal courts. Instead, Indian law principles of preemption direct state courts to apply tribal law in certain cases. A guiding principle emerges from the preemption analysis: if a tribe has legislative jurisdication over the dispute, tribal law must ordinarily be applied. In these instances, a state's laws, including its choice-of-law rules, are preempted by federal common law because their application interferes with the federal government's and the tribes' interest in promoting tribal self-government, including the tribes' ability …
Defining Indian Status For The Purpose Of Federal Criminal Jurisdiction,
2010
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Defining Indian Status For The Purpose Of Federal Criminal Jurisdiction, Katharine C. Oakley
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
R. V. Munyaneza: Pondering Canada's First Core Crimes Conviction,
2010
Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
R. V. Munyaneza: Pondering Canada's First Core Crimes Conviction, Robert Currie
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Canada recently completed its first genocide trial, which resulted in the conviction of the Rwandan accused, Desiré Munyaneza, for crimes committed during the Rwandan genocide. While the case is still under appeal, it represents a significant success for Canada’s relatively new core crimes legislation, the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, and was the first prosecution undertaken pursuant to that law. Drawing upon the Munyaneza case, the authors analyze the legislation and evaluate its effectiveness. They conclude that the model is an effective one that both bodes well for Canada’s future participation in the battle against impunity, and provides …
Competence And Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequence And Legitimacy,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Competence And Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequence And Legitimacy, Paul Craig
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The scope of EU competence and the limits on Member State autonomy can validly be analyzed from a variety of perspectives. This chapter considers one such perspective, the prevailing concern about the scope and exercise of EU competence. This concern is often based on the premise that some reified entity called the EU has increasingly arrogated power, with a consequent diminution of national autonomy that the Member States have been unable to resist, and the ECJ is frequently regarded as bearing primary responsibility. it will however be argued in the first half of this chapter that the Community courts were …
Ending Genetic Monopolies: How The Trips Agreement's Failure To Exclude Gene Patents Thwarts Innovation And Hurts Consumers Worldwide,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Ending Genetic Monopolies: How The Trips Agreement's Failure To Exclude Gene Patents Thwarts Innovation And Hurts Consumers Worldwide, Cydney A. Fowler
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Estate Of Pew V. Cardarelli,
2010
New York Law School Class of 2009
Virtual Contacts In Patent Cases: How Should Internet-Related Contacts Affect The Personal Jurisdiction Analysis?,
2010
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Virtual Contacts In Patent Cases: How Should Internet-Related Contacts Affect The Personal Jurisdiction Analysis?, Megan M. La Belle
Scholarly Articles
In the 1990s, when the Internet was still considered novel, courts struggled with the question of how Internet-related contacts should be treated in the personal jurisdiction analysis. So when Zippo Manufacturing v. Zippo DOT Com established an apparently easy-to-apply test for deciding whether a defendant’s virtual contacts are sufficient for personal jurisdiction, many courts embraced it . To date, however, the Federal Circuit has neither adopted nor rejected the Zippo approach, leaving litigants and lower courts in patent cases with little guidance on the issue. Although a recent decision suggests that the Federal Circuit recognizes the limitations of Zippo, it …
Whose Dictionary Controls?: Recent Challenges To The Term "Investment" In Icsid Arbirtration,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Whose Dictionary Controls?: Recent Challenges To The Term "Investment" In Icsid Arbirtration, Joseph M. Boddicker
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribal Civil Judicial Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers: A Practical Guide For Judges,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Tribal Civil Judicial Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers: A Practical Guide For Judges, Sarah Krakoff
Publications
This Article provides a summary of the law of tribal civil jurisdiction over persons who are not members of the governing tribe ("nonmembers'), followed by an analysis of trends in the lower courts. It was written to respond to a consensus view at the University of Colorado Law Review Symposium: "The Next Great Generation of American Indian Law Judges," in January 2010, that a concise, practical, yet in-depth treatment of this subject would be useful to the judiciary as well as practitioners. The Article traces the development of the Supreme Court's common law of tribal civil judicial jurisdiction from 1959 …
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court,
2010
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court, Catherine T. Struve
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
One Nation, Under Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit Notches A Win For Federalism In In Re Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Fee Litigation,
2010
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
One Nation, Under Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit Notches A Win For Federalism In In Re Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, Ethan H. Townsend
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court,
2010
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Sovereign Litigants: Native American Nations In Court, Catherine T. Struve
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carey Law
No abstract provided.
Duplicative Foreign Litigation,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Duplicative Foreign Litigation, Austen L. Parrish
Articles by Maurer Faculty
What should a court do when a lawsuit involving the same parties and the same issues is already pending in the court of another country? With the growth of transnational litigation, the issue of reactive, duplicative proceedings - and the waste inherent in such duplication - becomes a more common problem. The future does not promise change. In a modern, globalized world, litigants are increasingly tempted to forum shop among countries to find courts and law more favorably inclined to them than their opponents.
The federal courts, however, do not yet have a coherent response to the problem. They apply …
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Directors In Cross-Border Securities Litigation,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Directors In Cross-Border Securities Litigation, Hannah L. Buxbaum
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Significance Of The Fujimori Trial,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Significance Of The Fujimori Trial, Juan E. Mendez
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Assessing The Impact Of Federal Law On Public Health Preparedness,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Assessing The Impact Of Federal Law On Public Health Preparedness, Lindsay Wiley, Ben Berkman, Susan C. Kim
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.