Offenders And Sorn Laws, 2021 University of Michigan Law School
Offenders And Sorn Laws, Amanda Agan, J.J. Prescott
Book Chapters
Chapter 7 describes what we know about the effects of SORN laws on criminal behavior. A coherent story emerges from this review: there is virtually no evidence that SORN laws reduce recidivism or otherwise increase public safety. The chapter first delineates the various ways registration and notification alter the legal environment not only for registrants but also for nonregistrants, the public, and law enforcement. There are many channels through which SORN laws might impact the frequency of sex offenses, including some that would produce an increase in overall offending. The chapter assesses these possibilities in light of a large body …
The Corporate Insanity Defense, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Corporate Insanity Defense, Mihailis E. Diamantis
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Corporate criminal justice rests on the fiction that corporations possess “minds” capable of instantiating culpable mens rea. The retributive and deterrent justifications for punishing criminal corporations are strongest when those minds are well-ordered. In such cases misdeeds are most likely to reflect malice, and sanctions are most likely to have their intended preventive benefits. But what if a corporate defendant’s mind is disordered? Organizational psychology and economics have tools to identify normally functioning organizations that are fully accountable for the harms they cause. These disciplines can also diagnose dysfunctional organizations where the threads of accountability may have frayed and where …
Criminalizing China, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Criminalizing China, Margaret K. Lewis
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The Department of Justice launched the China Initiative in November 2018 to counter national security threats emanating from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). By June 2020, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had approximately two thousand active investigations under the Initiative.
People and entities with connections to the PRC’s governing party-state structure have engaged in trade secret theft and other crimes under U.S. law. The Department of Justice is not making up a threat. It is, however, framing that threat in a problematic way.
This Article argues that using “China” as the glue connecting cases prosecuted under the Initiative’s umbrella …
The Specific Deterrent Effects Of Criminal Sanctions For Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-Analysis, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Specific Deterrent Effects Of Criminal Sanctions For Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-Analysis, Joel H. Garner, Christopher D. Maxwell, Jina Lee
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
A dozen systematic reviews published since 1978 have sought to clarify the complexities of deterrence theory. These reviews emphasize the general deterrent effects of police presence, arrest, and incarceration on rates of homicide and other serious crimes, such as assault, rape, and burglary. These reviews provide less attention to specific deterrence processes and to the deterrent impacts of intermediate sanctions, such as prosecution or conviction; none of these reviews incorporate any of the research on criminal sanctions for intimate partner violence. To address these limitations, this research uses meta-analytic methods to assess the specific deterrent effects of three post-arrest criminal …
Peremptory Challenges: Preserving An Unequal Allocation And The Potential Promise Of Progressive Prosecution, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Peremptory Challenges: Preserving An Unequal Allocation And The Potential Promise Of Progressive Prosecution, Savanna R. Leak
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
In the United States, the relative allocation of peremptory challenges afforded to the defense and prosecution is at once in a state of paralysis and flux. The federal system maintains an unequal allocation of peremptory challenges between the defense and prosecution in noncapital offenses, while many states have moved toward equalization of the number of peremptory challenges afforded to each side over the last few decades. Currently, only five states and the federal system have retained an allocation of peremptory challenges that affords the defense a greater number of peremptory challenges in noncapital offenses. Further, only nine states and the …
Slouching Towards Autonomy: Reenvisioning Tribal Jurisdiction, Native American Autonomy, And Violence Against Women In Indian Country, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Slouching Towards Autonomy: Reenvisioning Tribal Jurisdiction, Native American Autonomy, And Violence Against Women In Indian Country, Joseph Mantegani
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Native American women face rates of sexual violence far beyond those experienced by any other race. But when those women live on reservations, their own tribes are restricted in their authority to protect their members. A maze of criminal jurisdiction overlies Indian country, one that depends on the location of the crime, the agreements a particular tribe has with local or federal authorities, the applicable federal jurisdictional statutes, and the offender’s race.
Since Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe in 1978, tribes have not had criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit crimes on their reservations. Rather, tribes must rely on state …
The Modern Common Law Of Crime, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Modern Common Law Of Crime, Robert Leider
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Two visions of American criminal law have emerged. The first vision is that criminal law is statutory and posits that legislatures, not courts, draft substantive criminal law. The second vision, like the first, begins with legislative supremacy, but it ends with democratic dysfunction. On this view, while contemporary American criminal law is statutory in theory, in practice, American legislatures badly draft and maintain criminal codes. This effectively delegates the “real” drafting of criminal law to prosecutors, who form the law through their charging decisions.
This Article offers a third vision: that modern American criminal law is primarily conventional. That is, …
Defending Constitutional Rights In Imbalanced Courtrooms, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Defending Constitutional Rights In Imbalanced Courtrooms, Esther Nir, Siyu Liu
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Safeguarding Fourth Amendment protections is critical to preserving individual privacy rights and fostering positive perceptions of police legitimacy within communities. Maintaining an effective accountability structure for police stops, searches, and seizures is a necessary step toward achieving these objectives. In this article, we use qualitative interviews and survey data with defense attorneys to explore—from a court community perspective— their use of discretion to uphold the Exclusionary Rule through bringing suppression motions. Data demonstrate that power dynamics within the court community lead defense attorneys to conclude that litigating rights violations is often a futile effort that interferes with favorable case outcomes …
Pregnant And Detained: Constitutional Rights And Remedies For Pregnant Detainees, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Pregnant And Detained: Constitutional Rights And Remedies For Pregnant Detainees, Natalie Avery Barnaby
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Over the last thirty years, the United States has increasingly expanded what is already the largest immigration detention system in the world. On a daily basis, the U.S. government holds more than 50,000 people in detention as they wait for their immigration hearings or their removal back to their home country. During the past two decades, presidential administrations have enacted regulations to deter immigrants from entering the United States and narrow their ability to stay in the country, leading to an overall increase in detentions.
There is wide documentation of poor detention conditions, inadequate medical care, and overcrowding in immigration …
Regional International Juvenile Incarceration Models As A Blueprint For Rehabilitative Reform Of Juvenile Criminal Justice Systems In The United States, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Regional International Juvenile Incarceration Models As A Blueprint For Rehabilitative Reform Of Juvenile Criminal Justice Systems In The United States, Robert Laird
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Adolescence marks a unique and transformative time in a person’s physical, emotional, and intellectual development and requires special considerations in the realm of criminal justice. This Comment explores how rehabilitative models of criminal justice are better suited than punitive models to recognize and accommodate the intricacies and special factors inherent in juvenile delinquency and uses examples from regional international bodies to illustrate how the United States can adopt measures that align with modern-day neurology and psychiatry. First, this Comment explores the unique characteristics of juvenile offenders as adolescent, semi-autonomous individuals who are more likely to be incompetent to stand trial …
Capital Felony Merger, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Capital Felony Merger, William M. Berry Iii
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Capital felony murder statutes continue to enable states to sentence criminal defendants to death. These are often individuals who possessed no intent to kill and, in some cases, did not kill. These statutes remain constitutionally dubious under the basic principles of the Eighth Amendment, but the United States Supreme Court’s evolving standards of decency doctrine has proved an ineffective tool to remedy these injustices. This Article proposes a novel doctrinal approach by which the Court could promote more consistent sentencing outcomes in felony murder cases. Specifically, the Article argues for the adoption of a constitutional felony merger doctrine that “merges” …
Missing The Misjoinder Mark: Improving Criminal Joinder Of Offenses In Capital-Sentencing Jurisdictions, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Missing The Misjoinder Mark: Improving Criminal Joinder Of Offenses In Capital-Sentencing Jurisdictions, Milton J. Hernandez Iv
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
In all state and federal jurisdictions in the United States, joinder allows prosecutors to join multiple offenses against a criminal defendant. Joinder pervades the American criminal justice system, and some jurisdictions see joinder in more than half of their cases. Most states and the federal courts use a liberal joinder system where courts may join offenses regardless of their severity or punishment. These systems derive from judicial efficiency arguments, seeking to avoid unnecessary trials and striving to conserve time, money, and other resources. In a liberal joinder regime, the court may force a defendant to prepare for a trial in …
Minding The Gap In Domestic Violence Legislation: Should States Adopt Course Of Conduct Laws?, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Minding The Gap In Domestic Violence Legislation: Should States Adopt Course Of Conduct Laws?, Teresa Manring
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
In the United States, there is a gap between the way that sociologists, psychologists, legal scholars, and advocates define domestic violence and the way that criminal laws define domestic violence. Experts largely agree: domestic violence occurs when a partner exercises continuous power and control over the other. In this view, domestic violence occurs via a pattern of abusive behaviors that unfolds over time, and its manifestations include both physically-violent and emotionally-abusive behaviors. In contrast, criminal statutes throughout the United States continue to conceptualize domestic violence as single acts of physical violence or threats of physical violence. During the past several …
Toward A More Perfect Trial: Amending Federal Rules Of Evidence 106 And 803 To Complete The Rule Of Completeness, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Toward A More Perfect Trial: Amending Federal Rules Of Evidence 106 And 803 To Complete The Rule Of Completeness, Louisa M. A. Heiny, Emily Nuvan
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The common law Rule of Completeness was designed to prevent parties from introducing incomplete—and thereby misleading—statements at trial. It ensured fundamental fairness by ensuring that a fact finder heard an entire statement or series of statements if the whole would “complete” the partial evidence presented. It served this important role in Anglo-American jurisprudence for centuries before the drafters of Federal Rule of Evidence 106 attempted to capture its essence in 1975. Unfortunately, what was once a simple and principled rule has been muddled by Federal Rule of Evidence 106 (FRE 106). The common law rule language was lost when FRE …
Don't (Tower) Dump On Freedom Of Association: Protest Surveillance Under The First And Fourth Amendments, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Don't (Tower) Dump On Freedom Of Association: Protest Surveillance Under The First And Fourth Amendments, Ana Pajar Blinder
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Government surveillance is ubiquitous in the United States and can range from the seemingly innocuous to intensely intrusive. Recently, the surveillance of protestors—such as those protesting against George Floyd’s murder by a police officer—has received widespread attention in the media and in activist circles, but has yet to be successfully challenged in the courts. Tower dumps, the acquisition of location data of cell phones connected to specific cell towers, are controversial law enforcement tools that can be used to identify demonstrators. This Comment argues that the insufficiency of Fourth Amendment protections for protesters being surveilled by government actors—by tactics such …
Breonna Taylor: Transforming A Hashtag Into Defunding The Police, 2021 Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Breonna Taylor: Transforming A Hashtag Into Defunding The Police, Jordan Martin
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
How can modern policing be reformed to address police violence against Black women when it can occur at no fault of their own and end with a shower of bullets in the middle of the night while within the sanctity of their own home? What is accomplished when her name is said but justice is never achieved? What good does it do when her story is subsequently overshadowed or overlooked by the reform movements that intend to correct racism and sexism respectively? This Comment analyzes both Black women’s vulnerability to police violence and their invisibility in reform movements. First, police …
Entitlement To Punishment, 2021 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Entitlement To Punishment, Kyron J. Huigens
Articles
This Article advances the idea of entitlement to punishment as the core of a normative theory of legal punishment's moral justification. It presents an alternative to normative theories of punishment premised on desert or public welfare; that is, to retributivism and consequentialism. The argument relies on H.L.A. Hart's theory of criminal law as a "choosing system," his theory of legal rules, and his theory of rights. It posits the advancement of positive freedom as a morally justifying function of legal punishment.
An entitlement to punishment is a unique, distinctive legal relation. We impose punishment when an offender initiates an ordered …
Invoking Criminal Equity's Roots, 2021 University of Kentucky
Invoking Criminal Equity's Roots, Cortney Lollar
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Equitable remedies have begun to play a critical role in addressing
some of the systemic issues in criminal cases. Invoked when other
solutions are inadequate to the fair and just resolution of the case,
equitable remedies, such as injunctions and specific performance,
operate as an unappreciated and underutilized safety valve that
protects against the procedural strictures and dehumanization that are
hallmarks of our criminal legal system. Less familiar equitable-like
legal remedies, such as writs of mandamus, writs of coram nobis, and
writs of audita querela, likewise serve to alleviate fundamental errors
in the criminal process. Several barriers contribute to the …
Sex, Crime, And Serostatus, 2021 University of Alabama School of Law
Sex, Crime, And Serostatus, Courtney K. Cross
Washington and Lee Law Review
The HIV crisis in the United States is far from over. The confluence of widespread opioid usage, high rates of HIV infection, and rapidly shrinking rural medical infrastructure has created a public health powder keg across the American South. Yet few states have responded to this grim reality by expanding social and medical services. Instead, criminalizing the behavior of people with HIV remains an overused and counterproductive tool for addressing this crisis—especially in the South, where HIV-specific criminal laws are enforced with the most frequency.
People living with HIV are subject to arrest, prosecution, and lengthy prison sentences if they …
Comment: Wysiati And False Confessions, 2021 Alston & Bird LLP
Comment: Wysiati And False Confessions, Michael R. Hoernlein
Washington and Lee Law Review
Decades after the Supreme Court mandated in Miranda v. Arizona that police advise suspects of their constitutional rights before custodial interrogation, confusion remains about the contours of the rule, and some law enforcement officers still try to game the system. In his excellent Note, “No Earlier Confession to Repeat”: Seibert, Dixon, and Question-First Interrogations, Lee Brett presents a careful analysis of the legal landscape applicable to so-called question-first interrogations. Mr. Brett offers a compelling argument urging courts not to interpret Bobby v. Dixon as limiting the application of Missouri v. Seibert to two-step (i.e., question-first) interrogations only when …