Antitrust And Innovation: Where We Are And Where We Should Be Going, 2011 University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Antitrust And Innovation: Where We Are And Where We Should Be Going, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
For large parts of their history intellectual property law and antitrust law have worked so as to undermine innovation competition by protecting too much. Antitrust policy often reflected exaggerated fears of competitive harm, and responded by developing overly protective rules that shielded inefficient businesses from competition at the expense of consumers. By the same token, the IP laws have often undermined rather than promoted innovation by granting IP holders rights far beyond what is necessary to create appropriate incentives to innovate.
Perhaps the biggest intellectual change in recent decades is that we have come to see patents less as a …
The Provider-Monopoly Problem In Health Care, 2011 Duke Law School
The Provider-Monopoly Problem In Health Care, Clark C. Havighurst, Barak D. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
Although federal judges have resisted giving due effect to standard antitrust principles in scrutinizing mergers of nonprofit hospitals, the presence of health insurance makes it especially important to oppose monopoly in health services markets. U.S.-style health insurance gives monopolist providers extraordinary pricing freedom, thus exacerbating monopoly’s usual redistributive effects. Significant allocative inefficiencies - albeit not the kind generally associated with monopoly - also result when the monopolist is a nonprofit hospital. Because it is probably impossible to undo past hospital mergers creating undue market power, we suggest some alternative remedies. One is to apply antitrust rules against "tying" arrangements so …
Unconscionable Amateurism: How The Ncaa Violates Antitrust By Forcing Athletes To Sign Away Their Image Rights, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 533 (2011), 2011 UIC School of Law
Unconscionable Amateurism: How The Ncaa Violates Antitrust By Forcing Athletes To Sign Away Their Image Rights, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 533 (2011), Brian Welch
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Those Who Ignore History Doomed To Repeat It?, 2011 University of Pennsylvania
Are Those Who Ignore History Doomed To Repeat It?, Peter Decherney, Nathan Ensmenger, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
In The Master Switch, Tim Wu argues that four leading communications industries have historically followed a single pattern that he calls “the Cycle.” Because Wu’s argument is almost entirely historical, the cogency of its claims and the force of its policy recommendations depends entirely on the accuracy and completeness of its treatment of the historical record. Specifically, he believes that industries begin as open, only to be transformed into closed systems by a great corporate mogul until some new form of ingenuity restarts the Cycle anew. Interestingly, even taken at face value, many of the episodes described in the …
The Ftaia And Claims By Foreign Plaintiffs Under State Law, 2011 St. John's University School of Law
The Ftaia And Claims By Foreign Plaintiffs Under State Law, Edward D. Cavanagh
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In Empagran, the Supreme Court construed the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA) to severely limit the extraterritorial reach of the Sherman Act. In the wake of Empagran and the D.C. Circuit’s subsequent ruling on remand in that case, foreign plaintiffs asserting claims under U.S. antitrust laws for injuries based on transactions consummated abroad have been largely shut out of federal courts. Foreign plaintiffs, however, have not abandoned their efforts to obtain relief in American courts for anticompetitive acts committed in the international arena. Rather, they have turned to claims under various state laws, including state antitrust laws, …
The Roberts Court And The Limits Of Antitrust, 2011 University of Missouri School of Law
The Roberts Court And The Limits Of Antitrust, Thom Lambert
Faculty Publications
This article first describes the fundamental limits of antitrust and the decision-theoretic approach such limits inspire. It then analyzes the Roberts Court’s antitrust decisions, explaining how each coheres with the decision-theoretic model. Finally, it predicts how the Court will address three issues likely to come before it in the future: tying, loyalty rebates, and bundled discounts.
Concerted Refusals To License Intellectual Property Rights, 2011 University of Iowa College of Law
Concerted Refusals To License Intellectual Property Rights, Christina Bohannan, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Unilateral refusals to license intellectual property rights are almost never antitrust violations, as is true of most unilateral refusals to deal. Concerted refusals to deal are treated more harshly under the antitrust laws because they can facilitate collusion or, in the case of technology, keep superior products or processes off the market.
In its en banc Princo decision a divided Federal Circuit debated whether Congress had protected concerted refusals to license from claims of patent misuse. The majority rejected the dissent’s argument that Congress had no such intent and then went on to hold that an alleged concerted refusal to …
Are People Self-Interested? The Implications Of Behavioral Economics On Competition Policy, 2011 University of Tennessee College of Law
Are People Self-Interested? The Implications Of Behavioral Economics On Competition Policy, Maurice Stucke
Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Case For Rebalancing Antitrust And Regulation, 2011 Georgetown University
The Case For Rebalancing Antitrust And Regulation, Howard A. Shelanski
Michigan Law Review
The continued growth of forensic DNA databases has brought about greater interest in a search method known as "familial" or "kinship" matching. Whereas a typical database search seeks the source of a crime-scene stain by making an exact match between a known person and the DNA sample, familial searching instead looks for partial matches in order to find potential relatives of the source. The use of a familial DNA search to identify the alleged "Grim Sleeper" killer in California brought national attention to the method, which has many proponents. In contrast, this Article argues against the practice of familial searching …
Introduction To Creation Without Restraint: Promoting Liberty And Rivalry In Innovation, 2011 University of Iowa College of Law
Introduction To Creation Without Restraint: Promoting Liberty And Rivalry In Innovation, Christina Bohannan, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This document contains the table of contents, introduction, and a brief description of Christina Bohannan & Herbert Hovenkamp, Creation without Restraint: Promoting Liberty and Rivalry in Innovation (Oxford 2011).
Promoting rivalry in innovation requires a fusion of legal policies drawn from patent, copyright, and antitrust law, as well as economics and other disciplines. Creation Without Restraint looks first at the relationship between markets and innovation, noting that innovation occurs most in moderately competitive markets and that small actors are more likely to be truly creative innovators. Then we examine the problem of connected and complementary relationships, a dominant feature of …
Antitrust Review Of The At&T/T-Mobile Transaction, 2011 University of Tennessee
Antitrust Review Of The At&T/T-Mobile Transaction, Maurice E. Stucke, Allen Grunes
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, we review AT&T Inc.’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA, Inc., under federal merger law, under the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission’s 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and with a focus on possible remedies. We find, under a rule of law approach, that the proposed acquisition is presumptively anticompetitive, and the merging parties in their public disclosures have failed to overcome this presumption. Next we find that under the Merger Guidelines, there is reason to believe that the transaction may result in higher prices to consumers under several different plausible theories. Finally, we turn …
Toward A Unified Theory Of Exclusionary Vertical Restraints, 2011 University of Michigan Law School
Toward A Unified Theory Of Exclusionary Vertical Restraints, Daniel A. Crane, Graciela Miralles
Articles
The law of exclusionary vertical restraints-contractual or other business relationships between vertically related firms-is deeply confused and inconsistent in both the United States and the European Union. A variety of vertical practices, including predatory pricing, tying, exclusive dealing, price discrimination, and bundling, are treated very differently based on formalistic distinctions that bear no relationship to the practices' exclusionary potential. We propose a comprehensive, unified test for all exclusionary vertical restraints that centers on two factors: foreclosure and substantiality. We then assign economic content to these factors. A restraint forecloses if it denies equally efficient rivals a reasonable opportunity to make …
Strategic Delegation Improves Cartel Stability, 2010 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Mikroökonomische Theorie
Strategic Delegation Improves Cartel Stability, Martijn Han
Martijn A. Han
Fershtman and Judd (1987) and Sklivas (1987) show that strategic delegation reduces firm profits in the one-shot Cournot game. Allowing for infinitely repeated interaction, strategic delegation can increase firm profits as it improves cartel stability.
Vertical Relations In Cartel Theory, 2010 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Mikroökonomische Theorie
Vertical Relations In Cartel Theory, Martijn Han
Martijn A. Han
A cartel is a group of firms collectively attempting to restrict competition among them. Cartel members most commonly do so by illegally fixing prices, sharing markets, or rigging bids. This dissertation explores managerial incentives to cartelize.
Short-Term Managerial Contracts And Cartels, 2010 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Mikroökonomische Theorie
Short-Term Managerial Contracts And Cartels, Martijn Han
Martijn A. Han
This paper shows how a series of commonly observed short-term CEO employment contracts can improve cartel stability compared to a long-term employment contract. When a manager's short-term appointment is renewed if and only if the firm hits a certain profit target, then (i) defection from collusion results in superior firm performance, thus reducing the chance of being fired, while (ii) future punishment results in inferior firm performance, thus increasing the chance of being fired in the future. The introduction of this re-employment tradeoff intertwines with the usual monetary tradeoff and can improve cartel stability. Studying the impact of fixed versus …
Summaries Of Twenty Cases Of Successful Private Antitrust Enforcement, 2010 University of San Francisco
Summaries Of Twenty Cases Of Successful Private Antitrust Enforcement, Joshua Davis, Robert Lande
Joshua P. Davis
This document summarizes twenty cases of successful private antitrust enforcement. These twenty summaries build on earlier summaries of forty additional cases of successful private enforcement available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105523. An analysis of the data from the original forty cases is available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1090661 (published as Robert L. Lande and Joshua P. Davis, Benefits From Private Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Forty Cases, 42 U.S.F. L. REV. 879 (2008)) and an argument based on the forty cases that private antitrust enforcement has greater deterrence effects than criminal enforcement by the Department of Justice is available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1565693 (published as Robert L. Lande …
Sailing A Sea Of Doubt: A Critique Of The Rule Of Reason In U.S. Antitrust Law, 2010 University of San Francisco
Sailing A Sea Of Doubt: A Critique Of The Rule Of Reason In U.S. Antitrust Law, Jesse W. Markham Jr.
Jesse Markham
The purpose of the article is to offer a critique of the rule of reason, tracing its disintegration from its original articulation 100 years ago in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 60 (1911). The article then describes a construct for restoring transparency and content to the rule of reason. The rule of reason is the default standard for assessing restraints under the Sherman Act. The role for the rule of reason has expanded in recent years as the Supreme Court has reversed a number of per se rules, thus relegating additional categories of restraints to the …
Revising The Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons From The U.S. And The E.U., 2010 University of California - Berkeley
Revising The Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons From The U.S. And The E.U., Richard J. Gilbert
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
No abstract provided.
The New United States Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Devolution, Evolution, Or Counterrevolution?, 2010 University of South Dakota School of Law
The New United States Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Devolution, Evolution, Or Counterrevolution?, Thomas J. Horton
Thomas J. Horton
No abstract provided.
The Coming Extinction Of Homo Economicus And The Eclipse Of The Chicago School Of Antitrust: Applying Evolutionary Biology To Structural And Behavioral Antitrust Analyses, 2010 University of South Dakota School of Law