2009 Naep Reading Results,
2010
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
2009 Naep Reading Results, Nathan C. Jensen, Gary W. Ritter
Policy Briefs
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as “the Nation’s Report Card,” is a national assessment of what students in each state know in various subjects. The grade 4 and 8 mathematics and reading portions of the NAEP were administered in 2009. We highlighted the math results, which were released last fall, in the 2009 Arkansas Report Card (http://www.uark.edu/ua/oep/report_cards/2009_Report Card.pdf). The 2009 reading scores were released at the end of March, 2010. This policy brief highlights the recent NAEP reading results and demonstrates, bluntly, that growth has stagnated both in the U.S. and Arkansas.
Food Allergies In Public Schools: Toward A Model Code,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Food Allergies In Public Schools: Toward A Model Code, Michael Borella
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Sufferers of food allergies can experience anaphylactic shock, and even death, within minutes of exposure to allergens such as peanuts, soy, wheat, eggs, milk, and fish. This causes unique problems when the food allergy sufferers are children in public schools. The widespread availability of these allergens in school lunchrooms and classrooms places children with food allergies in danger while they are entrusted to the government's care. Since these children, especially young children, cannot be relied upon to be able to avoid allergens on their own, reasonable and logical laws should be in place to ensure that children are safe while …
The Power Of The Parental Trump Card: How And Why Frazier V. Winn Got It Right,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
The Power Of The Parental Trump Card: How And Why Frazier V. Winn Got It Right, Jocelyn Floyd
Chicago-Kent Law Review
When two fundamental rights are in conflict, such that the protection of one requires the infringement of the other, courts must weigh those rights against each other to determine which is ultimately greater. In Frazier v. Winn, the Eleventh Circuit dealt with precisely such an issue: specifically, the rights of parents pitted against those of their children. This note explores the history of both parental rights and student's rights in school to show why the court appropriately affirmed that children's right to free speech is only as expansive as their parents allow, justified by the parents' fundamental right to …
Table Of Contents,
2010
University of South Carolina
Free Speech At Private Universities,
2010
University of South Carolina
Free Speech At Private Universities, Kelly Sarabyn
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
From Comparing Plus Factors To Context Review: The Future Of Affirmative Action In Higher Education,
2010
University of South Carolina
From Comparing Plus Factors To Context Review: The Future Of Affirmative Action In Higher Education, Lauren S. Foley
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Student Suicide: Dying For University Liability,
2010
University of South Carolina
Student Suicide: Dying For University Liability, Perry A. Zirkel
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Review,
2010
University of South Carolina
Commentaries,
2010
University of South Carolina
The Undue Hardship Of Education,
2010
University of South Carolina
The Undue Hardship Of Education, Charles Booker
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Freedom From Compulsion,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Freedom From Compulsion, Tess Slattery
Chicago-Kent Law Review
A recent Eleventh Circuit case, Frazier ex rel. Frazier v. Winn, upheld as facially constitutional a Florida statute that requires a student to obtain parental permission before abstaining from participation in the Pledge of Allegiance. This note argues that the court reached the wrong conclusion because it failed to properly weigh the students' right to free speech against the parents' right to control the upbringing of their children. This note argues that Justice Breyer's framework for balancing conflicting rights should be adopted for use in this context. By applying Justice Breyer's balancing test, the Florida statute should be found …
A "Pay Or Play" Experiment To Improve Children's Educational Television,
2010
University of Miami School of Law
A "Pay Or Play" Experiment To Improve Children's Educational Television, Lili Levi
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Article addresses both the constitutionality and the efficacy of the FCC's current rules that require broadcasters to air children's educational programming. It argues that, even though the rules would probably pass muster under the First Amendment, they should nevertheless be substantially revised.
Empirical studies show mixed results, with substantial amounts of educationally insufficient programming. This is predictable-attributable to broadcaster incentives, limits on the FCC's enforcement capacities, and audience factors. Instead, the Article advises a turn away from programming mandates. It proposes a "pay or play" approach that allows broadcasters to pay a fee to a fund for high-quality public …
Remembering Ed Baker,
2010
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Remembering Ed Baker, Monroe E. Price
Articles
The article commemorates the life and scholarly contributions of Professor C. Edwin Baker, a preeminent scholar of constitutional law, free speech, and communications law. Baker advanced a unique liberal theory of the First Amendment, emphasizing individual autonomy and equality over the marketplace of ideas. His work critiqued media deregulation and corporate speech, advocating for content-neutral regulation to protect democratic processes. His legacy includes influential books, mentorship, and a commitment to social justice, profoundly shaping global discussions on free speech and democracy.
University Tort Liability For Student Suicide: The Sky Is Not Falling,
2010
University of South Carolina
University Tort Liability For Student Suicide: The Sky Is Not Falling, Richard Fossey, Heather E. Moore
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Primary & Secondary Education,
2010
University of South Carolina
Universities & Other Institutions Of Higher Learning,
2010
University of South Carolina
Universities & Other Institutions Of Higher Learning
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Do Higher Education Institutions Have A Misunderstanding Of The Fundamental Research Exemption: How Export Control Regulations Change University Research,
2010
University of South Carolina
Do Higher Education Institutions Have A Misunderstanding Of The Fundamental Research Exemption: How Export Control Regulations Change University Research, William Metcalf
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
U.S. Legal Education Methods And Ideals: Application To The Japanese And Korean Systems,
2010
University of Wyoming College of Law
U.S. Legal Education Methods And Ideals: Application To The Japanese And Korean Systems, Matthew J. Wilson
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article examines the adoption of American-style legal education in Japan and South Korea, highlighting both the opportunities and challenges these reforms present. While these countries aim to enhance legal professionalism and competency by integrating practical skills and interactive teaching methods, they face significant cultural, structural, and systemic barriers. The analysis underscores the importance of adapting legal education to local contexts while balancing theoretical and practical training to meet global legal demands.
Adopted Speech: Summum'S Implications On Government-Sponsored, Student Speech,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
Adopted Speech: Summum'S Implications On Government-Sponsored, Student Speech, Landon Wade Magnusson
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The State Constitutionality Of Voucher Programs: Religion Is Not The Sole Determinant,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
The State Constitutionality Of Voucher Programs: Religion Is Not The Sole Determinant, Preston C. Green Iii, Peter L. Moran
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
