Decency And Responsibility: Preserving Egyptian Tally Cloth Cultural Heritage And Protecting The Intellectual Property Of Egyptian Artisans., 2025 The British University in Egypt
Decency And Responsibility: Preserving Egyptian Tally Cloth Cultural Heritage And Protecting The Intellectual Property Of Egyptian Artisans., Noha Fawzy Ph.D, Marwa Zein Ph.D, Ahmed Elseragy Ph.D, Catherine Harper Ph.D
Arts and Design
Tally is an exquisite Egyptian netting fabric, cotton or linen with nickel silver, copper or brass strip embroidery, a powerful symbol of Egypt's opulent textile and artisanal culture. Traditionally handmade, it originated in Upper Egypt’s Asyut region where ancient Egyptian makers pioneered embellishment of translucent cloth with metallic threads. Its iconography - geometric flora, fauna, humans and camels – in black, white or ecru. With beautiful drape and fluidity, it is a highly valued part of Egypt’s rich cultural heritage.
Preserving Tally and protecting the intellectual property rights of its artisans is urgent to ensure sustainable livelihoods, safeguard this unique …
Who Invented It? Streamlining Determination Of Patent Inventorship, 2024 Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology
Who Invented It? Streamlining Determination Of Patent Inventorship, Henry H. Perritt, Jr.
University of Miami Law Review
Disputes over inventorship are common in industries where new technology is important. Patents are invalid unless correct inventors are named on the patent, even when all the inventors have assigned their rights to the enterprise applying for a patent. The complexity of modern technology is such that an invention qualifying for a patent rarely is the work of only one individual. Employees and former employees frequently claim that they have been left off patent applications wrongfully. Patent law provides a variety of ways to correct inventorship both while such applications are being prosecuted in the U. S. Patent and Trademark …
Streaming Service Arms Race: Protection And Distribution Of Live Sports Broadcasting In A Cord-Cutting Environment, 2024 Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Streaming Service Arms Race: Protection And Distribution Of Live Sports Broadcasting In A Cord-Cutting Environment, Leo Bourgeois
Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies
This paper highlights the disparity in meeting consumer expectations for broadcasting sports content. The current shift to online streaming services creates accessibility and affordability challenges, leading to an increase in illegal streaming. The existing copyright laws in Canada and the U.S. have some limitations in enforcing the rights of sports media rights holders against primary or secondary infringement, and intermediaries face difficulties in removing infringing content. While injunctions and site-blocking orders are potential solutions, they may not completely combat online piracy. A possible solution is a centralized streaming service to address piracy while improving customer satisfaction. However, concerns about feasibility, …
Questions And Answers On The Future Of Ip For Research And Innovation, 2024 American University Washington College of Law
Questions And Answers On The Future Of Ip For Research And Innovation, Sean Flynn
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This paper publishes the annotated contents of an interview with PIJIP Director Sean Flynn by the staff of WIPO’s work on the Future of IP. All questions relate to the future of copyright with respect to AI assisted innovation.
Author Remuneration In The Streaming Age – Exploitation Rights And Fair Remuneration Rules In The Eu, 2024 Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam; Of Counsel, Bird & Bird, The Hague, The Netherlands
Author Remuneration In The Streaming Age – Exploitation Rights And Fair Remuneration Rules In The Eu, Martin Senftleben, Elena Izyumenko
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
The transition from linear to on-demand consumption of music, films and other copyrighted content on platforms like Spotify, Netflix and YouTube has given rise to the question whether authors and performers receive a fair share of streaming revenues. While these revenues are substantial and right holders may have the opportunity to control access to copyright-protected content on the basis of copyright protection, it is often not the creators themselves who benefit from growing streaming revenue and reinforced access controls. The issue has a global dimension. The Group of Latin American and Caribbean Countries (GRULAC) proposed that the World Intellectual Property …
Brief Of 20 Professors Of Law And Public Knowledge As Amici Curiae In Support Of Affirmance, 2024 American University Washington College of Law
Brief Of 20 Professors Of Law And Public Knowledge As Amici Curiae In Support Of Affirmance, Charles Duan, Rachel Bamberger
Amicus Briefs
In Carroll Shelby Licensing v. Halicki, the U.S. Court of Appeals considers whether a car in a film is a "character" for purposes of copyright law. Character copyright protection has proven to be an especially difficult area of the law, and courts and commentators have struggled with the proper boundaries of such protection and whether characters are independently protectable works at all. This brief presents a novel legal argument for resolving the scope of character copyright, at least in the context of inanimate objects in creative works such as cars. While the case law and commentary has to date focused …
The Evolution Of Irs: A Brief History, 2024 University of Nebraska-Lincoln
The Evolution Of Irs: A Brief History, Paul Royster
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
A history of institutional (and other) repositories 1980-2022: precursors and preconditions, environmental survey, 1990s the groundwork, 2000s the beginnings, 2010s expansion and rise of metrics, mergers and acquisitions, growth, features, nay-sayers and hesitations, the download button, Dear Author messages, progression of strategies, expert advice, what happened and what didn't, evolutionary radiation, advantages and opportunities.
Classifying Open Access Business Models, 2024 Mellins-Cohen Consulting
Classifying Open Access Business Models, Tasha Mellins-Cohen
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
The proliferation of open access (OA) business models has been rapid, presenting challenges for stakeholders in communicating and working effectively with one another. This article aims to clarify terminologies and address the inconsistencies and gaps in previous attempts to categorize OA models, supporting informed decision-making. It presents five core types, each with distinct characteristics and implications for funding, equity, and implementation. Operating at the level of individual pieces of content, transactional models expose authors to the financial implications of their decisions to make content OA; they often must pay out of their own funds. Driven by negotiations between libraries or …
A Right To Be Left Dead, 2024 University at Buffalo School of Law
A Right To Be Left Dead, Mark Bartholomew
Journal Articles
Technology forces us to contemplate a counterpart to the right of privacy—Brandeis and Warren’s “right to be let alone”—for the age of artificial intelligence: the right to be left dead. Traditionally, it has been presumed that even if Brandeis and Warren’s right constitutes “the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men,” it does not apply to the dead. The question is whether we need a new approach at a time when technology can reanimate anyone and make them behave in a manner indistinguishable from their living presence. This Article interrogates the need for a right …
Access To Justice As Access To Data, 2024 Georgetown University Law Center
Access To Justice As Access To Data, Tanina Rostain
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This Keynote Address, delivered in celebration of the launch of SCALES, discusses the importance of making local and state court data available for research on the functioning of the American civil justice system. It describes the regulatory and administrative challenges of obtaining good-quality data from courts. It calls for a concerted effort among researchers and policymakers to develop open-source technologies for the development of case management systems and data infrastructure. And it urges researchers to foster a collaborative research ecosystem based on broadly sharing court data.
Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, And Associated Traditional Knowledge, 2024 Texas A&M University School of Law
Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, And Associated Traditional Knowledge, N.S. Gopalakrishnan, Srividhya Ragavan, Narendran Thiruthy
Faculty Scholarship
The recently concluded WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge mandates disclosure requirements in patent applications, thereby creating an obligation to attribute the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. The WIPO member countries thus have an opportunity to modify their national patent laws, so that they can effectively control genetic resources and traditional knowledge. This article examines the choices that the biodiversity-rich countries have when designing their national legal systems to implement the treaty.
The Eu Geo-Blocking Regulation: A Commentary, 2024 University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
The Eu Geo-Blocking Regulation: A Commentary, Marketa Trimble
Media & Informal Publications
Professor Trimble delivered a presentation for the Centre for Legal Innovation and Digital Society at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. This was an invitation to present Professor Trimble's book The EU Geo-Blocking Regulation: A Commentary (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024) at the university's 16th Law & Digital Society Book Talk.
Artificial Intelligence, Copyright Registration, And The Rule Of Doubt, 2024 Texas A&M University School of Law
Artificial Intelligence, Copyright Registration, And The Rule Of Doubt, Thomas B. James
Texas A&M Law Review
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) technology has detonated an explosive burst of seemingly creative expression. Stories, images, music, and even entire books are now being generated very quickly. This development is a major headache for copyright registrars because the copyrightability of works created in this way is uncertain. The almost limitless variability in the extent of human involvement in the creation of a work using an AI tool compounds the uncertainty. In some cases, copyrightability is easy to determine, such as where an author only claims rights in the selection and arrangement of AI-generated output rather than the output itself. But in …
Operating Internationally Under The Current Patchwork Of National Exceptions And Limitations To Copyright (With An Ai Angle) Plus: Nevada Ip Statistics, 2024 University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Operating Internationally Under The Current Patchwork Of National Exceptions And Limitations To Copyright (With An Ai Angle) Plus: Nevada Ip Statistics, Marketa Trimble
Media & Informal Publications
Professor Trimble delivered a presentation for the 2024 Intellectual Property Conference, hosted by the Intellectual Property Law Section of the State Bar of Nevada.
Antitrust Class Action To Challenge Collusion Among The World’S Six Largest For-Profit Publishers Of Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Journals, 2024 University of California, Los Angeles
Antitrust Class Action To Challenge Collusion Among The World’S Six Largest For-Profit Publishers Of Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Journals, Lucina Uddin, Dean M. Harvey, Jallé H. Dafa, Benjamin A. Trouvais, Emily N. Harwell, Benjamin D. Elga, Janet Herold
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
Scholar and scientist Dr. Lucina Uddin (the “Scholar Plaintiff”) brings this antitrust class action to challenge collusion among the world’s six largest for-profit publishers of peer-reviewed scholarly journals: (1) Elsevier B.V.; (2) Wolters Kluwer N.V.; (3) John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; (4) Sage Publications, Inc.; (5) Taylor and Francis Group, Ltd.; and (6) Springer Nature AG & Co. KGaA (collectively, the “Publisher Defendants”). In violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the Publisher Defendants conspired to unlawfully appropriate billions of dollars that would have otherwise funded scientific research (the “Scheme”).
The Publisher Defendants’ Scheme has three primary components. First, …
Burdening The “Skilled Searcher”: The Federal Circuit Falls Short Of Providing Ironclad Fixes To § 315(E) Estoppel Issues In Ironburg V. Valve, 2024 Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Burdening The “Skilled Searcher”: The Federal Circuit Falls Short Of Providing Ironclad Fixes To § 315(E) Estoppel Issues In Ironburg V. Valve, William Kehoe
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
From The Bench, 2024 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
From The Bench, Pierre Leval, M. Margaret Mckeown, Jane C. Ginsburg
Faculty Scholarship
Lightly edited transcript of panel comments at the 2023 Symposium, “Rearrange, Transform, or Adapt: The Derivative Works Right After Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.”
Going "Beyond" Mere Transformation: Warhol And Reconciliation Of The Derivative Work Right And Fair Use, 2024 Columbia Law School
Going "Beyond" Mere Transformation: Warhol And Reconciliation Of The Derivative Work Right And Fair Use, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Peter S. Menell
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith is a watershed moment in the story of copyright jurisprudence. At its broadest, the decision articulates a unified vision — one that had been dormant in the lower court fair use jurisprudence — about the role of copyright and the manner in which to make sense of its effort to balance exclusivity with its myriad limitations. This Essay focuses on how the Court reconciled the working of the statute’s derivative work right with the breadth and reach of the “transformative use” version of the fair …
Hachette V. Internet Archive: How And Why The Courts Broke Copyright, 2024 Georgetown University
Hachette V. Internet Archive: How And Why The Courts Broke Copyright, Michelle M. Wu
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The exclusive rights of copyright owners have always been overbroad which, if read literally, would make many common activities illegal (e.g., reading a book during library story hour, making a mixed tape, etc). What has prevented overreach is a social contract. The public at large has been tolerant of copyright’s broad grant of rights because of the understanding that the rights would be exercised only in very limited circumstances. The rights were not intended to empower copyright owners to undermine the overwhelming number of reasonable uses of copyrighted works that make society productive. For centuries, rightsholders and courts have generally …
A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, 2024 Boston University School of Law
A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, Keith N. Hylton, Madisyn Lynn Richards
Faculty Scholarship
In this article we suggest three novel amendments to U.S. patent law to increase efficiency and decrease costs. We first contend that while the assertion of invalid patents is detrimental because of anticompetitive effects, such competition concerns should place no duty upon applicants to disclose prior art at the outset. Additionally, we argue that to avoid resource waste, the USPTO should outsource prior art searches for certain applications, as in Japan. Finally, we propose a system where patentees have the option to elect to a patent box regime that reduces their taxes on patent profits substantially (e.g., from 21% to …