Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Pacific McGeorge School of Law
William & Mary Law School
University of Washington School of Law
William & Mary Law School
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
JD Candidate
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Evidence Of Gambling Expert Witness In Prosecuting Online Gambling Offences: Malaysia’S Experience And Way Forward,
2023
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Evidence Of Gambling Expert Witness In Prosecuting Online Gambling Offences: Malaysia’S Experience And Way Forward, Sharifah Zulia Balqish S. Agil
International Conference on Gambling & Risk Taking
Abstract:
Accessibility of online gambling surges with rife coverage of the Internet worldwide including in Malaysia. Criminal procedures to curb rampancy of online gambling are the last bastion of the society from gambling disorder hazards. However, prosecuting online gambling offences poses ginormous technical challenges to police force and prosecutors. The assistance of gambling expert witness is sine qua non in proving attributes of games as gambling. The existing Malaysia legal framework stipulates for appointment of gambling expert witness in prosecuting traditional gambling offences but absence of online equivalent. This paper seeks to examine the general law on expert witness in …
Childist Objections, Youthful Relevance, And Evidence Reconceived,
2023
Penn State Dickinson Law
Childist Objections, Youthful Relevance, And Evidence Reconceived, Mae C. Quinn
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Evidence rules are written by and for adults. As a result, they largely lack the vantage point of youth and are rooted in arm’s-length assumptions about the lives and legal interests of young people. Moreover, because children have been mostly treated as evidentiary afterthoughts, they have been patched into the justice system and its procedures in a piecemeal fashion. Yet, to date, there has been no comprehensive scholarly critique of evidence principles and practices for failing to meaningfully account for youth. And the evidentiary intersection of youth and race has been almost entirely overlooked in legal scholarship. This Article, in …
“Hey, Google, What Are The Elements Of Homicide By Vehicle In The First Degree?”: The Supreme Court Of Georgia Reinforces The Prohibition On Extrajudicial Information Considered By A Jury In Criminal Trials,
2023
Mercer University School of Law
“Hey, Google, What Are The Elements Of Homicide By Vehicle In The First Degree?”: The Supreme Court Of Georgia Reinforces The Prohibition On Extrajudicial Information Considered By A Jury In Criminal Trials, Savannah Hall
Mercer Law Review
In a criminal trial, the presentation of evidence and the instruction of law to the jury are of crucial importance to ensure that a person is only convicted based upon sound understandings of the factual and legal framework under which they were charged. The complexities surrounding the rules of evidence are in place so that jurors are only allowed to consider the facts and testimony permissible under the rules of evidence, meaning it is of utmost importance for the jury to consider solely those things which a judge deems admissible, relevant, and helpful to understanding the case. However, given the …
The Long Road To Justice: Why State Courts Should Lower The Evidentiary Burden For Proving Racialized Traffic Stops And Adopt The Exclusionary Rule As A Remedy For Equal Protection Violations,
2023
University of Washington School of Law
The Long Road To Justice: Why State Courts Should Lower The Evidentiary Burden For Proving Racialized Traffic Stops And Adopt The Exclusionary Rule As A Remedy For Equal Protection Violations, Abby M. Fink
Washington Journal of Social & Environmental Justice
Racist and brutal policing continues to pervade the criminal legal system. Black and brown people who interact with the police consistently face unequal targeting and treatment. Routine traffic stops are especially dangerous and harmful and can lead to death. Under Whren, a police officer’s racist motivations or implicit bias towards a driver do not influence the constitutionality of a traffic stop. An officer only needs to show there was probable cause to believe a traffic stop occurred. Although the unconstitutionality of pre-textual traffic stops has been widely explored since Whren, both federal and state courts have struggled to find legal …
The "Crisis Of Expertise" Reaches The Courtroom: An Introduction To The Symposium On, And A Response To, Edward Cheng's Consensus Rule,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The "Crisis Of Expertise" Reaches The Courtroom: An Introduction To The Symposium On, And A Response To, Edward Cheng's Consensus Rule, David S. Caudill
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Owls: Some Difficulties In Judging Scientific Consensus,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The Owls: Some Difficulties In Judging Scientific Consensus, Harry Collins
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Adversity Of Adversarialism: How The Consensus Rule Reproduces The Expert Paradox,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The Adversity Of Adversarialism: How The Consensus Rule Reproduces The Expert Paradox, Martin Weinel
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Consensus Rule: Lessons From The Regulatory World,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The Consensus Rule: Lessons From The Regulatory World, Wendy Wagner
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Embracing Deference,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Embracing Deference, Edward K. Cheng, Elodie O. Currier, Payton B. Hampton
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Consensus Rule: Judges, Jurors, And Admissibility Hearings,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The Consensus Rule: Judges, Jurors, And Admissibility Hearings, Robert Evans
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
What A Waste! An Evaluation Of Federal And State Medical And Biohazard Waste Regulations During The Covid-19 Pandemic And Their Impact On Environmental Justice,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
What A Waste! An Evaluation Of Federal And State Medical And Biohazard Waste Regulations During The Covid-19 Pandemic And Their Impact On Environmental Justice, Samantha Newman
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Something Doesn’T Add Up: Solving Dna Forensic Science Statistical Fallacies In Trial Testimony,
2023
Vanderbilt University
Something Doesn’T Add Up: Solving Dna Forensic Science Statistical Fallacies In Trial Testimony, Kendall Brooke Kilberger
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
While the limitations of traditional forensic sciences are generally recognized, the presentation of DNA forensic science statistical testimony has widely evaded criticism. This lack of oversight has allowed four DNA forensic science statistical fallacies to plague the legal system: providing statistics without empirical support, the individualization fallacy, the prosecutor’s fallacy, and the defense attorney’s fallacy. These fallacies pose a significant risk to the preservation of justice, as erroneous DNA forensic science statistical testimony plays a critical role in wrongfully convicting innocent defendants.
This Note suggests administering standard jury instructions every time DNA forensic science statistical testimony is presented during trial. …
Reforming Eyewitness Identification Processes: Challenges And Recommendations For Successful Implementation,
2023
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Reforming Eyewitness Identification Processes: Challenges And Recommendations For Successful Implementation, Daniel Manley
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Safeguarding The Alford Plea: Minimizing State-Sanctioned Wrongful Convictions,
2023
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Safeguarding The Alford Plea: Minimizing State-Sanctioned Wrongful Convictions, Zana Molina
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Ai Risk Assessment Tools Amid The War On Drugs: Productive Or Counterproductive?,
2023
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Ai Risk Assessment Tools Amid The War On Drugs: Productive Or Counterproductive?, Matin Pedram
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
The War on Drugs refers to a situation in which all the processes of production, distribution, and consumption of all illegal drugs are prohibited. This ambitious goal has imposed considerable costs on societies. The war has weaponized harsher punishments such as life imprisonment, execution, and long-term incarceration against drug offenders. Nonviolent offenders, those who possessed illegal drugs, have been easy targets for governments to show that the war is still ongoing. Although some countries became pioneers in changing the laws to end this costly war, Iran and the United States have made their stance on the drug issue clear, and …
Environmental Evidence,
2023
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Environmental Evidence, Seema Kakade
Faculty Scholarship
The voices of impacted people are some of the most important when trying to make improvements to social justice in a variety of contexts, including, criminal policing, housing, and health care. After all, the people with on the ground experience know what is likely to truly effectuate change in their community, and what is not. Yet, such lived experience is also often significantly lacking and undermined in law and policy. People with lived experience tend to be seen as both community experts with valuable knowledge, as well as non-experts with little valuable knowledge. This Article explores the lived experience with …
Provisional Measures In Aid Of Arbitration,
2023
University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Provisional Measures In Aid Of Arbitration, Ronald A. Brand
Articles
The success of the New York Convention has made arbitration a preferred means of dispute resolution for international commercial transactions. Success in arbitration often depends on the extent to which a party may secure assets, evidence, or the status quo between parties prior to the completion of the arbitration process. This makes the availability of provisional measures granted by either arbitral tribunals or by courts fundamental to the arbitration. In this Article, I consider the existing legal framework for provisional measures in aid of arbitration, with particular attention to the sources of the rules providing for such measures. Those sources …
Digital Habit Evidence,
2023
American University Faculty Account
Digital Habit Evidence, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This Article explores how “habit evidence” will become a catalyst for a new form of digital proof based on the explosive growth of smart homes, smart cars, smart devices, and the Internet of Things. Habit evidence is the rule that certain sorts of semiautomatic, regularized responses to particular stimuli are trustworthy and thus admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) 406 “Habit; Routine Practice” and state equivalents.
While well established since the common law, “habit” has made only an inconsistent appearance in reported cases and has been underutilized in trial practice. But intriguingly, once applied to the world of …
Evidence,
2022
Mercer University School of Law
Evidence, John E. Hall Jr., W. Scott Henwood, Krysta Grimes
Mercer Law Review
Georgia’s judicial system has continued to grapple with the novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) for more than two years since the Honorable Harold D. Melton, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia,
first issued the Order Declaring Statewide Judicial Emergency on March 14, 2020. That order was extended fifteen times before finally terminating on June 30, 2021.
Seemingly in response to the world of uncertainties created by COVID-19, Georgia appellate courts took the opportunity to provide some additional interpretation and explanation to various aspects of Georgia’s new Evidence Code. This Article highlights some of the continuing interpretations of Georgia’s evidence …
What Counts As ‘Racist Enough?’: A Clearer Standard For New Trials When Jurors Demonstrate Racial Bias,
2022
Brooklyn Law School
What Counts As ‘Racist Enough?’: A Clearer Standard For New Trials When Jurors Demonstrate Racial Bias, Priyadarshini Das
Journal of Law and Policy
The no-impeachment rule, Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), necessitates that jurors keep their deliberations secret. However, in the 2017 Supreme Court case Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the Court created a racial bias exception to the no-impeachment rule. This exception allows jurors to notify the court when “one or more jurors made statements exhibiting overt racial bias that cast serious doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the jury’s deliberations and resulting verdict.” This Note argues that this standard is too narrow because it fails to consider several situations of racial bias, like implicit bias. The ineffectiveness of this exception is demonstrated …
