Opportunities And Pitfalls Under Sections 351 And 721,
William & Mary Law School
Opportunities And Pitfalls Under Sections 351 And 721, Craig L. Rascoe, William M. Richardson
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
A Practical Guide To The Tax Consequences Of Disposing Of A Partnership (Or Llc) Business,
William & Mary Law School
A Practical Guide To The Tax Consequences Of Disposing Of A Partnership (Or Llc) Business, Richard M. Lipton, John T. Thomas
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
The Corporate General Partner In A Limited Partnership,
William & Mary Law School
The Corporate General Partner In A Limited Partnership, Henry Weiler
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
The Allocation Of Partnership Income And Loss Under Sec.704,
William & Mary Law School
The Allocation Of Partnership Income And Loss Under Sec.704, Herschel M. Bloom
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
The Post-Revolutionary Period In Corporate Law: Returning To The Theory Of The Firm,
Seattle University School of Law
The Post-Revolutionary Period In Corporate Law: Returning To The Theory Of The Firm, Matthew T. Bodie
Seattle University Law Review
The consensus on corporate law theory has narrowed the field’s doctrinal and methodological foci. Although the vibrancy of shareholder primacy has at times been called into question as a matter of law, both boardrooms and courts have taken the normative call for shareholder wealth maximization increasingly to heart. There is little doubt that the revolution has not only substantially affected legal theory but also legislation, court decisions, and corporate behavior. It achieved a level of success unusual for an academic discipline; it not only transformed the field but also the world. We now find ourselves in the post-revolutionary period. For …
Partners Without Partners: The Legal Status Of Single Person Partnerships,
Fordham Law School
Partners Without Partners: The Legal Status Of Single Person Partnerships, Robert W. Hillman, Donald J. Weidner
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Is it possible to have a partnership consisting of one person, a partner without a partner? The question will arise when all but one of the members leaves a partnership. The Revised Uniform Partnership Act attempts to give greater stability to partnerships by narrowing the circumstances under which dissolutions occur, but it also fails to address the fundamental and important question of whether a partnership may be continued by a sole surviving partner. In this Article, we explore the issues raised by a single person partnership. In particular, we address the central issue of whether the departure of the penultimate …
Partnership Tax Allocation Provisions,
William & Mary Law School
Partnership Tax Allocation Provisions, Brian J. O'Connor
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Federal Taxation On Disposition Of Partnership Interests,
William & Mary Law School
Federal Taxation On Disposition Of Partnership Interests, Richard A. Shaw
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Property And Liability Transfers To Partnerships: Built-In Gain Or Loss, Boot, And Disguised Sales,
William & Mary Law School
Property And Liability Transfers To Partnerships: Built-In Gain Or Loss, Boot, And Disguised Sales, Andrea M. Whiteway
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Corporate Takeover Of Teaching Hospitals,
Georgetown University Law Center
Corporate Takeover Of Teaching Hospitals, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article explores the potential and the dangers of this novel form of collaboration between academic medicine and the for-profit world. The author focuses on those arrangements--purchases and leasing agreements--by which investor-owned corporations operate, for a profit, hospitals that serve as major medical teaching and research sites. He begins by reviewing how the evolving needs of academic medical centers and for-profit hospital chains have generated mutual interest in such arrangements. The author then considers some frequently expressed ethical, economic, and other public policy objections to the provision of hospital services by for-profit firms. Opponents of the acquisition and leasing of …
