Torts Commons^™

Caesar’S Gambit: Coherence, Justification Of Legal Rules, And The Duty Test: Towards An Interactional Theory Of Government Liability For Negligence In Disaster Management, Irehobhude O. Iyioha

Dalhousie Law Journal

This article examines barriers posed by the duty of care test for government liability for negligence in disaster management. It argues that various aspects of the test raise concerns about coherence, legitimacy of judicial decision-making, and ultimately how we justify liability in tort law. In examining the coherence of the duty test through multiple prisms, including through theoretical justifications for tort principles, this article contends that the duty test, in its framing and interpretations, fails to meet the formal and substantive demands of coherence, correctness and legitimacy. Arguing that justificatory theories offer necessary theoretical lenses through which to understand, critique, …

On The Fence About Immigration And Overpopulation: "Environmentalists" Challenge Dhs Policies On Nepa Basis In Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District V. Mayorkas, Maya J. Williams

Villanova Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Experiments In Legal Hybridity: From Indian Tort Law To Tribal Tort Law, Noah T. Allaire

Tribal Law Journal

Tort law is a broad set of rules designed to compensate people who have suffered injuries and harm by imposing penalties on those who caused the resulting injuries and harm. Indian tort law is the limited set of rules that the United States imposed upon tribal nations over a century ago. Today, tribal courts have the important opportunity and responsibility to articulate tribal tort law. Tribal legislatures, in turn, can codify tribal tort rules to guide future judicial decisionmaking. Through this process, tribal tort law will gradually supplant Indian tort law. Articulating tribal tort law necessarily involves conducting experiments in …

Internet Jurisdiction And The 21st Century: Zippo, Calder, And The Metaverse, Gretchen Yelmini

Connecticut Law Review

Internet use in the United States continues to increase at a rate that outpaces the legal system. From reliance on outdated precedent, differing long-arm statutes, and emergent technologies, there are unanswered questions of whether existing precedent is sufficient to handle our increasingly borderless society.

Many courts still rely on the Zippo test despite the exponential advancements in how we use the internet in the twenty-five years since the Western District of Pennsylvania developed a framework for this issue. The Supreme Court has continued to avoid directly addressing the issue. In 2014, the Court left decisions on virtual presence to “another …

Connecticut’S Crumbling Foundations: Legal Remedies And Legislative Responses, Jacqueline T. Bashaw

Connecticut Law Review

Latent harms pose unique challenges for the legal system. Such issues are often referred to as long-tail issues, wherein the actual harmful chain of events is set in motion years before it is discovered and wreaks havoc. Asbestos is one example. Pyrrhotite is another.

A seemingly innocuous mineral, pyrrhotite has infiltrated Connecticut homes. Somewhere between 3,000 to 35,000 concrete foundations were poured in the state from 1983 to 2016, with varying amounts of pyrrhotite trapped within. These foundations have begun to deteriorate, costing homeowners thousands of dollars as their investments quite literally crumble beneath their feet. While the problem was …

Clicking Away Consent: Establishing Accountability And Liability Apportionment In Direct-To-Consumer Healthcare Artificial Intelligence, Stephanie L. Lee

Brooklyn Law Review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning are making sweeping changes across all industries, and health care is no exception. AI promises to revolutionize patient treatment with the development of algorithm-driven tools to improve efficiency in clinical care. As alluring as machine-driven learning may be given its potentialities, however, the incorporation of AI into the healthcare field has also been received with trepidation. This fear is understandable given the lack of transparency to the public surrounding the exact mechanisms for creating algorithms and the reasoning followed by the software. Indeed, AI in the healthcare system is aptly known as “black-box medicine.” …

The Next Revolution? Negligence Law For The 21st Century, Allan C. Hutchinson

Dalhousie Law Journal

Donoghue’s neighbour is still the defining concept of Canadian tort law. Indeed, the whole history of modern negligence law can be reasonably understood as a concerted judicial effort to adapt and accommodate that principle to changing social, commercial and legal conditions. Now, 90 years later, it is perhaps time to recommend another revolution in negligence law. The Donoghue-inspired doctrine has done sterling work, but it is now weighed down with a bewildering range of conditions, clarifications and complications. When the duty analysis is complemented by other related requirements of causation and remoteness, the law of negligence has become something of …

Rising Tide: The Second Wave Of Climate Torts, Maximillian Scott Matiauda

University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review

Fossil fuels and tobacco products share startling similarities. Both enjoy ubiquity, enable their users to keep pace with the ever-increasing demands of civilization, and choke the life out of those who partake and those who merely look on. The comparison extends to legal battles against their respective industries, as evidenced by a new wave of tort litigation in the federal courts of the United States. In a time where climate change was still establishing consensus, states took up the charge against tobacco companies who had successfully defended against private lawsuits over the deleterious health effects of tobacco. Those suits culminated …

Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Akibat Terjadinya Wanprestasi Karena Pandemi Covid-19: Studi Perbandingan Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia, Nadya Aurelia Salsabila

Lex Patrimonium

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on various aspects of people’s lives, one of which is the existence of contracts whose implementation has been disrupted because there are some of parties who cannot fulfill their achievements or contractual obligations by postulating the Covid-19 pandemic as a category of force majeure. This research discusses the implementation of contracts due to defaults due to the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia and Malaysia. The method used is normative juridical by examining laws and regulations and court decisions in the two countries which are the focus of comparison in this research. The conclusion …

Urgensi Pengawasan Terhadap Penyedia Jasa Pengiriman Dalam Kegiatan E-Commerce: Studi Komparasi Indonesia Dengan Malaysia, Lydia Azzahro Silparensi, Abdul Salam

Lex Patrimonium

Delivery service providers are a role that is needed, especially with the increase in e-commerce activity. However, the implementation of courier services is still lacking in overcoming these problems. As an effort to increase supervision while adapting it to consumer needs, an analysis was carried out using a normative juridical method by comparing the two institutions between Indonesia and Malaysia. Institutions in Malaysia are different from Indonesia which are under the auspices of the Ministry of Communication and Informatics, that the Malaysian Institution known as the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission is an institution whose role is to oversee communication …

Aspek Keperdataan Terhadap Arisan Online: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/Pdt.G.S/2021/Pn. Trt, Catherine Sukutania, Abdul Salam

Lex Patrimonium

The development of communication technology gave birth to various phenomena in society, one of which is the arisan online phenomenon. Previously, arisan was often found in the midst of Indonesian society and was carried out conventionally by holding meetings between its members. Currently, arisan can be found online through various social media with various types and methods of implementation. In arisan, there is an engagement relationship between members of the arisan and the chairman or owner of the arisan. In general, arisan is carried out only with an oral agreement between the members and the chairman. Online arisan activities are …

Economic Recession As The Basis For Termination Of Employment Due To Force Majeure In Indonesia, Khalillah Lenggogeni

Lex Patrimonium

The economy is the most influential aspect in society. The Economics situation is one of the considerations in fulfilling achievements in agreements. The purpose of this study is to examine the economic recession that can be used as a reason for termination of employment due to force majeure in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. This research is a normative juridical research. The state of the company's economy, which is often affected by the country's economic growth, is often one of the factors why companies have to terminate their employment. The termination of employment under the pretext of an …

Legal Position Of Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate Based On Fiduciary Guarantee Deed Under Hand, Furqoniah Hayati, Akhmad Cahyono

Lex Patrimonium

The provisions of Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees stipulate that a fiduciary guarantee deed must be drawn up with a notarized deed and registered. The legal consequences for deeds that are not made with a notarized deed and registered cause there is no legal certainty and protection for the parties, both finance companies as creditors and consumers as debtors. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of fiduciary guarantees under the private deed, how a fiduciary guarantee under a private deed can be registered, as well as the executorial …

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Pembeli Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Marketplace Dengan Sistem Pembayaran Cash On Delivery, Zahra Adinda Atyarisma, Lauditta Humaira

Lex Patrimonium

The rapid development of technology often creates new problems. One of them is an event where the buyer refuses to pay for an order package made through a marketplace with a cash on delivery payment system where this event can make the seller suffer a loss. The research method used is normative juridical research by analyzing reading materials and laws and regulations related to the nature of analytical descriptive research. Data collection uses secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, namely legislation and secondary legal materials, namely books, journals, and articles related to primary legal materials. The results of the …

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Praktik Konversi Bunga Menjadi Saham Pada Perusahaan X Di Indonesia, Nadya Amanda Putri, Dr. Akhmad Budi Cahyono

Lex Patrimonium

Since it was announced that Indonesia had experienced the Covid-19 pandemic, the structure of the national economy immediately dropped drastically. This condition occurs because business actors are unable to carry out their business activities under ideal conditions which reduce the income of business actors on a national scale. With the unstable income of each business actor, it is difficult for each of them to pay their debt obligations. These difficulites make companies choose other alternatives to pay their obligations by way of entering into a debt restructuring agreement. In a study conducted on PT X and PT Z, both of …

Law's Credibility Problem, Julia Simon-Kerr

Washington Law Review

Credibility determinations often seal people’s fates. They can determine outcomes at trial; they condition the provision of benefits, like social security; and they play an increasingly dispositive role in immigration proceedings. Yet there is no stable definition of credibility in the law. Courts and agencies diverge at the most basic definitional level in their use of the category.

Consider a real-world example. An immigration judge denies asylum despite the applicant’s plausible and unrefuted account of persecution in their country of origin. The applicant appeals, pointing to the fact that Congress enacted a “rebuttable presumption of credibility” for asylum-seekers “on appeal.” …

Why Indiana Harbor Is The Worst Torts Decision In American History

Connecticut Law Review

Judge Richard A. Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co., concerning a spill of the hazardous chemical acrylonitrile at a railyard near Chicago, is considered the definitive statement on the abnormally dangerous activity doctrine. That doctrine (also known as the ultrahazardous activity doctrine) holds that one who engages in an abnormally dangerous activity is strictly liable for harm caused to others, regardless of negligence. However, Judge Posner’s opinion suggests that strict liability should rarely displace the negligence standard, even for commercial activities that externalize high degrees of risk. That approach leads …

Emotional Distress Claims, Dignitary Torts, And The Medical-Legal Fiction Of Reasonable Sensitivity, Alessandra Suuberg

Journal of Law and Health

Can individuals with a highly sensitive temperament recover in tort for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED)? In 2019, an article in the University of Memphis Law Review raised this question, referring to the "Highly Sensitive Person" (HSP) construct in psychology and asking whether the IIED tort’s 'reasonable person' standard discriminates against highly sensitive plaintiffs. Following up on that discussion, the present article considers how the law of IIED has historically treated plaintiffs with diagnosed psychiatric vulnerabilities that are either known or unknown to the defendant. The article also extends this discussion to the law's treatment of temperaments, such as …

Wrongs To Us, Steven Schaus

Michigan Law Review

A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. Defendant. Why? The answer is at once completely obvious and deeply puzzling. The plaintiff’s spouse is part of the case because, in almost every U.S. state, she has a claim against the defendant too—not for battery or negligence, as her spouse might, but for the loss of her spouse’s “consortium.” And yet, it’s not at all clear why a spouse should have a tort claim of this kind. A plaintiff who sues in tort, Judge Cardozo once explained, must always identify “ ‘a …

Our Biggest Fans: Nuisance Immunity For Grid-Scale Wind Energy Projects In Maine, Andrew D. Hersom

Maine Law Review

Global climate change and its attendant impacts threaten to change life on Earth as we know it. The sea level rise that comes with rising temperatures is an issue of particular importance to coastal states like Maine. Thankfully, continued investment in renewable energy technology is beginning to make certain renewable energy sources competitive with their nonrenewable counterparts. This Comment highlights wind energy as a particularly effective option for meeting Maine’s energy needs while significantly reducing the harmful greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. Despite its many benefits, wind energy technology still has its detractors. Wind energy projects (especially …