Products Liability - Restatement (Second) Of Torts - Section 402a - Uncertain Standards Of Responsibility In Design Defect Cases - After Azzarello, Will Manufacturers Be Absolutely Liable In Pennsylvania,
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Products Liability - Restatement (Second) Of Torts - Section 402a - Uncertain Standards Of Responsibility In Design Defect Cases - After Azzarello, Will Manufacturers Be Absolutely Liable In Pennsylvania, Robert F. Harchut
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
History, Development, And Analysis Of The Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act: An Overview,
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
History, Development, And Analysis Of The Pennsylvania Comparative Negligence Act: An Overview, David S. Shrager, Carol Nelson Shepherd
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Proposed Federal Product Liability Statute From The Toxic Tort Plaintiff's Perspective,
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
The Proposed Federal Product Liability Statute From The Toxic Tort Plaintiff's Perspective, Jerry J. Phillips
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota,
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota, J. David Prince
William Mitchell Law Review
Warranty law is an important supplement to tort law principles governing liability for defective products. Warranties arise from promises or assertions associated with either the sale of a product or some other transfer of a product for value. Such promises or assertions about a product may be express, made in the form of the seller’s statements about the qualities or attributes of the product, or they may simply be implied as a matter of policy. Although warranty law is generally regarded today as part of the body of contract law, the origins of warranty lie in tort. Important developments in …
Proving Negligence In Products Liability Litigation,
University of South Carolina
Proving Negligence In Products Liability Litigation, David G. Owen
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems And Reform,
University of South Carolina - Columbia
A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems And Reform, David G. Owen
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Product Liability Law In Japan: An Introduction To A Developing Area Of Law,
Continental Bank
Product Liability Law In Japan: An Introduction To A Developing Area Of Law, Younghee Jin Ottley, Bruce L. Ottley
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Toxic Torts, Autism, And Bad Science: Why The Courts May Be Our Best Defense Against Scientific Relativism,
New England School of Law
Toxic Torts, Autism, And Bad Science: Why The Courts May Be Our Best Defense Against Scientific Relativism, Joelle A. Moreno
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Design Defects,
University of South Carolina - Columbia
On The Propriety Of The Public Interest Requirement In The Washington Consumer Protection Act—Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86,
Seattle University School of Law
On The Propriety Of The Public Interest Requirement In The Washington Consumer Protection Act—Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86, Susan K. Storey
Seattle University Law Review
This Note discusses first, whether the judicially created public interest element of a private consumer protection case can be justified by the language of the Consumer Protection Act and, second, assuming some justification for the element can be found, whether the public interest test, as delineated in Anhold v. Daniels and Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title Insurance Co. serves a purpose intended by the legislature.” This Note concludes that the public interest element is unnecessary because it hinders and often prevents consumer litigation of private damage actions under the Act. Moreover, the public interest element cannot be …
