Solemn Vow: Solum's Originalism, Treaties, And Tribal Sovereignty In Castro-Huerta,
2023
University of Maine School of Law
Solemn Vow: Solum's Originalism, Treaties, And Tribal Sovereignty In Castro-Huerta, Liam L. Sheridan
Maine Law Review
In Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, the Supreme Court held that states have inherent authority to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians in “Indian country.” Only two years earlier, the Court in McGirt v. Oklahoma held that most of eastern Oklahoma was Indian country, and thus immune from any state criminal jurisdiction. Castro-Huerta limited this immunity and narrowed the Court’s view of tribal sovereignty as a whole. The majority represented the Court’s originalist faction—minus Justice Gorsuch, who had penned both the majority opinion in McGirt and the dissent in Castro-Huerta. The majority and dissent disagreed over whether federal statutes preempted Oklahoma’s criminal jurisdiction. …
The Dark Matter Of Federal Indian Law: The Duty Of Protection,
2023
University of Maine School of Law
The Dark Matter Of Federal Indian Law: The Duty Of Protection, Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Maine Law Review
The United States and every federally recognized tribal nation originally entered into a sovereign-to-sovereign relationship highlighted by the duty of protection, an international customary law doctrine in which a larger, stronger sovereign, America in this case, agrees to “protect” the small, weaker sovereign, in this case, tribal nations. America agreed to this in exchange for massive, occasionally unquantifiable amounts of land and resources, as well as the power to control the external sovereign relations of the protected sovereign. The smaller sovereigns received protected reservation lands, hunting and fishing rights, small cash infusions, and the vague promise of protection. What tribal …
Caesar’S Gambit: Coherence, Justification Of Legal Rules, And The Duty Test: Towards An Interactional Theory Of Government Liability For Negligence In Disaster Management,
2023
University of Victoria
Caesar’S Gambit: Coherence, Justification Of Legal Rules, And The Duty Test: Towards An Interactional Theory Of Government Liability For Negligence In Disaster Management, Irehobhude O. Iyioha
Dalhousie Law Journal
This article examines barriers posed by the duty of care test for government liability for negligence in disaster management. It argues that various aspects of the test raise concerns about coherence, legitimacy of judicial decision-making, and ultimately how we justify liability in tort law. In examining the coherence of the duty test through multiple prisms, including through theoretical justifications for tort principles, this article contends that the duty test, in its framing and interpretations, fails to meet the formal and substantive demands of coherence, correctness and legitimacy. Arguing that justificatory theories offer necessary theoretical lenses through which to understand, critique, …
Beneficial Interests Under The Chattels Real Act,
2023
Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Beneficial Interests Under The Chattels Real Act, Gregory French
Dalhousie Law Journal
This paper examines the Chattels Real Act of Newfoundland and Labrador and the strict treatment of property interests thereunder. Historical treatment of property interests under the Act had been pragmatic and flexible, however later jurisprudence took a stricter interpretation and restricted the interpretation of beneficial interest under the Act. The author suggests that a review of first principles and jurisprudence supports a broader interpretation of property interests under the Act, which should be followed for the better administration of justice and practical expectations of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Cet article examine la Chattels Real Act de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador et …
Where To Place The “Nones” In The Church And State Debate? Empirical Evidence From Establishment Clause Cases In Federal Court,
2023
St. John's University School of Law
Where To Place The “Nones” In The Church And State Debate? Empirical Evidence From Establishment Clause Cases In Federal Court, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise
St. John's Law Review
In this third iteration of our ongoing empirical examination of religious liberty decisions in the lower federal courts, we studied all digested Establishment Clause decisions by federal circuit and district court judges from 2006 through 2015. The first clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution directs that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” That provision has generated decades of controversy regarding the appropriate role of religion in public life.
Holding key variables constant, we found that Catholic judges approved Establishment Clause claims at a 29.6% rate, compared with a 41.5% rate before non-Catholic …
An Outlook For Employing The "Initial Coin Offering" (Ico) For The Issuance Of "Islamic Smart Sukuk" Across The Blockchain,
2023
Association of Arab Universities
An Outlook For Employing The "Initial Coin Offering" (Ico) For The Issuance Of "Islamic Smart Sukuk" Across The Blockchain, Dr. Mohiuddin Adnan Al-Hajjar
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
The Blockchain introduced new concepts related to the field of finance especially by giving birth to cryptocurrencies. This technical tool is for some a revolution in the business world, while other conservatives are careful about this new technology. Among its various applications, ICO represent an attractive solution for companies seeking capital.
The Islamic orientation of ICO can be an alternative for Islamic financing of projects and businesses to the general public, i.e. companies or individuals. Our analytical and comparative approach is to prove that:
- The issue via an ICO results in the appearance of a Token representing the co-ownership …
Preemption In Shares,
2023
Assistant Professor of Civil Law, College of Law, Kuwait University.
Preemption In Shares, Hussein Muheisen Al-Rashidi Dr.
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
The Court of Appeals was presented with a dispute concerning the recovery of shares sold. The shareholder of a simplified joint-stock company had invoked the right of preemption, which is established by the Civil Code. The Court decided (on 1/10/2017, Appeals Nos. 1704, 1783/2017, Commercial, Civil, Governmental, Unpublished) that the shareholder could return the sold shares in accordance with his right of preemption. It considered that Company Law did not regulate the restitution of shares in the joint-stock company and that it was, therefore, necessary to refer to the provisions of the Civil Code.
We think the decision of the …
The New Dread, Part Ii: The Judicial Overthrow Of The Reasonableness Standard In Police Shooting,
2023
Texas Southern University Thurgood Marshall School of Law
The New Dread, Part Ii: The Judicial Overthrow Of The Reasonableness Standard In Police Shooting, Kindaka J. Sanders
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article series argues that the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on excessive force from Graham v. Connor to the present has undermined the objectivity of the reasonableness standard. In its place, the Court has erected a standard that reflects modern conservative political ideology, including race conservatism, law and order, increased police discretion, and the deconstruction of the Warren Court’s expansion of civil rights and civil liberties. Indeed, the Court, dominated by law-and-order conservatives, is one of the greatest triumphs of conservatism. Modern conservatism developed as a backlash against various social movements like the Civil Rights Movement and spontaneous urban rebellions during …
The Ruling Of Cosmetic Injections: A Jurisprudential Study,
2023
Assistant Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence, College of Sharia and Islamic Studies, Kuwait University
The Ruling Of Cosmetic Injections: A Jurisprudential Study, Ali Suleiman Al Saleh Dr.
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
Cosmetic injections are a medical procedure, completely different from surgery, where a long-term change occurs in the body. The materials used in this procedure varies by source, whether a human, animal or mineral, which would require to study the ruling of utilizing them in cosmetic or medication.
The research concluded that the ruling of using cosmetic injections varies by functions in terms of filling in facial wrinkles and organs, causing paralysis in muscles, or feeding and motivating the skin. It also varies according to the materials injected into the body in terms of generating them from human, animal or otherwise. …
Criteria For Considering The Shari’A Need When Applied To A Commercial Insurance Contract: An Applied Jurisprudential Study,
2023
Master’s Degree Student, University of Tripoli, Beirut, Lebanon
Criteria For Considering The Shari’A Need When Applied To A Commercial Insurance Contract: An Applied Jurisprudential Study, Ahmed Al-Shafei Mr
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
control and measure it. By proposing a list of criteria used in assessing their existence, consideration or elimination, and to test the criteria, the researcher applied them to a commercial insurance.
In order to achieve the goal of the research; the researcher used the inductive analytical method, by following the rules suggested by the Fuqaha’, which required an analysis of some Fuqaha’ sayings, to build standards.
The research concluded that the «Need» that some Fuqaha’ considered in the permissibility of commercial insurance does not meet these criteria in a way that supports their opinion. Accordingly; Commercial insurance in its current …
University Grievance Procedure Pertaining To Exam Results: Its Concept, Legitimacy, And Procedural Mechanism Under Islamic Jurisprudence,
2023
Ajma university
University Grievance Procedure Pertaining To Exam Results: Its Concept, Legitimacy, And Procedural Mechanism Under Islamic Jurisprudence, Asma Salmeen Al-Aryani
مجلة جامعة الإمارات للبحوث القانونية UAEU LAW JOURNAL
The research deals with an important topic that has not previously been raised in the jurisprudence arena, which is the university grievance. University grievance is one of the rights of the student who demands reconsideration of his/her test paper because he/she is not satisfied with the degree awarded. This topic is related to jurisprudential rulings and their implications. This research aims to explain the mechanism for dealing with them and their results, whether they are in the interest of the student or against him/her. The research followed two approaches: Descriptive (analytical and deductive) approach and inductive approach. The research concluded …
Preference-Based Federalism,
2023
St. Mary's University
Preference-Based Federalism, Marquan Robertson
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary,
2023
St. Mary's University
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary, Elise Mclaren Villers
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Essay continues a discussion on the authority of courts, executives, and legislators to govern nations where the law diverges from necessity or morality. In a previous Comment, P. Elise McLaren, Answering the Call: A History of the Emergency Power Doctrine in Texas and United States, 53 St. Mary’s L.J. 287 (2022), I asked whether necessity or emergency ever supersedes the law, i.e., whether “emergency powers” exist. In this Essay, I ask whether the government is held accountable to a force other than the people themselves, namely, religious influence. As was done with respect to emergency powers, I ask …
John Roberts And Owen Roberts: Echoes Of The Switch In Time In The Chief Justice’S Jurisprudence,
2023
St. Mary's University
John Roberts And Owen Roberts: Echoes Of The Switch In Time In The Chief Justice’S Jurisprudence, Luke G. Cleland
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Perpetual Cycle Of “Give-And-Take”: The Case For Texas Eminent Domain Reform,
2023
St. Mary's University
A Perpetual Cycle Of “Give-And-Take”: The Case For Texas Eminent Domain Reform, Kathryn Faulk
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A House Built On Sand: The Qualified Immunity Case For Keeping The Smith Doctrine,
2023
St. Mary's University
A House Built On Sand: The Qualified Immunity Case For Keeping The Smith Doctrine, Joshua L. Johnston
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
More Than Lip Service Is Required: Excessive Fines Clause Limitations Upon Fining The Homeless,
2023
City of Walla Walla, Washington
More Than Lip Service Is Required: Excessive Fines Clause Limitations Upon Fining The Homeless, Tim Donaldson
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Public Accommodations Originalism’S Inability To Solve The Problems Of Online Content Moderation,
2023
St. Mary's University
Public Accommodations Originalism’S Inability To Solve The Problems Of Online Content Moderation, Vincent A. Marrazzo
St. Mary's Law Journal
In response to online platforms’ increasing ability to moderate content in what often seems to be an arbitrary way, Justice Clarence Thomas recently suggested that platforms should be regulated as public accommodations such that the government could prevent platforms from banning users or removing posts from their sites. Shortly thereafter, Florida passed the Transparency in Technology Act, which purported to regulate online platforms as public accommodations and restricted their ability to ban users, tailor content through algorithmic decision-making, and engage in their own speech. Texas followed suit by passing a similar law, and Arizona debated a bill purporting to regulate …
Change We Can Believe In: The Seventh Circuit's Exposure Of Inadequate Environmental Review In Protect Our Parks V. Buttigieg,
2023
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Change We Can Believe In: The Seventh Circuit's Exposure Of Inadequate Environmental Review In Protect Our Parks V. Buttigieg, P. Nicholas Greco
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Proportionality V. Categorization: The Issue Of Judicial Balancing Of Rights,
2023
American University in Cairo
Proportionality V. Categorization: The Issue Of Judicial Balancing Of Rights, Akram Mohamed
Theses and Dissertations
The fact that there is a constant conflict between individual rights and state or social interests has historically provoked the question of how to balance or harmonize such conflicting interests? On what basis shall the legislator or the judge decide in favor of this or that right in his legislation or judgement? Where shall we, for example, draw the line between the right to freedom of expression and the right to protect one’s honor and reputation? How could the legislator find the compromise between the state duty to protect fetus life and its obligation not to interfere with woman’s right …
