Using Law And Education To Make Human Rights Real In Women’S Real Lives,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
Using Law And Education To Make Human Rights Real In Women’S Real Lives, Nancy Chi Cantalupo
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Three courses involving gender, human rights and global laws that the author teaches to two different groups (women’s/gender studies and international affairs undergraduates; and law students) demonstrate methods of making international human rights law and principles real to women’s real lives, as both an educational and activist project. By focusing on the linkages between “thinking globally” and “acting locally” in the area of gender and human rights, these courses suggest some ways of to educate and encourage students to actualize human rights laws and principles in their own communities and lives. The topics, methods and materials used in these courses …
The Parent As (Mere) Educational Trustee: Whose Education Is It, Anyway?,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
The Parent As (Mere) Educational Trustee: Whose Education Is It, Anyway?, Jeffrey Shulman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The purpose of this Article is two-fold. First, the Article argues that the parent’s right to educate his or her children is strictly circumscribed by the parent’s duty to ensure that children learn habits of critical reasoning and reflection. The law has long recognized that the state’s duty to educate children is superior to any parental right. Indeed, the “parentalist” position to the contrary rests on an inflation of rights that is, in fact, a radical departure from longstanding legal norms. Indeed, at common law the parent had “a sacred right” to the custody of his child, and the parent’s …
Individualized Service Provision In The New Welfare State: Lessons From Special Education In Finland,
2010
Columbia Law School
Individualized Service Provision In The New Welfare State: Lessons From Special Education In Finland, Charles F. Sabel, Annalee Saxenian, Reijo Miettinen, Peer Hull Kristensen, Jarkko Hautamäki
Faculty Scholarship
The essay is four parts. Part 2 sets out the theoretical frame of the argument. It explains briefly why social solidarity increasingly depends on the provision of capacitating or enabling circumstances; why those services must increasingly be adapted to individual needs to be effective; and what is organizationally problematic (from the point of view of current theories of organization) about the success of countries such as Finland, Denmark and the US in delivering these services. It sketches two paths — a Nordic way, building on traditional professions, and a roundabout, US way, re-building broken bureaucracies originally intended as substitutes for …
