Legalism And Decisionism In Crisis,
2010
St. John's University School of Law
Legalism And Decisionism In Crisis, Noa Ben-Asher
Faculty Publications
In the years since September 11, 2001, scholars have advocated two main positions on the role of law and the proper balance of powers among the branches of government in emergencies. This Article critiques these two approaches-which could be called Legalism and Decisionism-and offers a third way. Debates between Legalism and Decisionism turn on (1) whether emergencies can be governed by prescribed legal norms; and (2) what the balance of powers among the three branches of government should be in emergencies. Under the Legalist approach, legal norms can and should guide governmental response to emergencies, and the executive branch is …
The Making Of The Attorney General: John Mitchell And The Crimes Of Watergate Reconsidered,
2010
Pacific McGeorge School of Law
The Making Of The Attorney General: John Mitchell And The Crimes Of Watergate Reconsidered, Gerald Caplan
McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Taking From The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Lessons In Ensuring Presidential Continuity,
2010
Saint Louis University School of Law
Taking From The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Lessons In Ensuring Presidential Continuity, Joel K. Goldstein
All Faculty Scholarship
Although some have criticized the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution for leaving gaps in America’s provisions for addressing presidential succession and inability, such complaints are misguided. The Amendment represented a major step forward by providing sensible and workable procedures to remedy some of the most glaring problems the nation faced. Its architects recognized the remaining gaps but realized that advancing a more comprehensive measure would preclude any progress. Nonetheless, remaining gaps present an unacceptable risk that the United States will find itself without a functioning President whose exercise of presidential powers and duties is seen as legitimate. What …
Taking Cues From Congress: Judicial Review, Congressional Authorization, And The Expansion Of Presidential Power,
2010
BYU Law
Taking Cues From Congress: Judicial Review, Congressional Authorization, And The Expansion Of Presidential Power, David H. Moore
Faculty Scholarship
In evaluating whether presidential acts are constitutional, the Supreme Court often takes its cues from Congress. Under the Court's two most prominent approaches for gauging presidential power-Justice Jackson's tripartite framework and the historical gloss on executive power-congressional approval of presidential conduct produces a finding of constitutionality. Yet courts and commentators have failed to recognize that congressional authorization may result from a failure of checks and balances. Congress may transfer power to the President against institutional interest for a variety of reasons. This key insight calls into question the Court's reflexive reliance on congressional authorization. Through this reliance, the Court overlooks …
Governing The Presidential Nomination Commons,
2010
BYU Law
Governing The Presidential Nomination Commons, Brigham Daniels
Faculty Scholarship
States jockeying to hold primaries and caucuses as early as possible has become the central theme of the presidential primary system. While the trend of racing to vote is not new, it has increased alarmingly. In 2008, more than half the states held contests by the first week of February. This free-for-all hurts the democratic process by encouraging uninformed voting, emphasizing the role of money in campaigns, and pressing candidates to rely on sound-bite campaigning. Because the presidential nomination is one of the most important decisions left to voters in the United States, this problem is well-recognized. It is also …
Special 301 And Access To Medicine In The Obama Administration,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Special 301 And Access To Medicine In The Obama Administration, Sean Flynn
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
I. Introduction
This article examines the history and current use of the Special 301 program to restrict access to generic medicines in developing countries, specifically the 2009 and 2010 reports released under the Obama Administration. The news for access to medicines advocates is not good overall. Both reports continue the previous Administration’s policies of using Special 301 to promote Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“TRIPS”) policies (“TRIPS-plus”) endangering access to medicines for millions of people worldwide. These policies violate not only the Obama Administration’s pledges to promote access to affordable medications in developing countries, but also U.S. commitments under …
Placing Your Faith In The Constitution,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Placing Your Faith In The Constitution, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
Climate Change And Institutional Competence,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Climate Change And Institutional Competence, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
Worcester V. Georgia: A Breakdown In The Separation Of Powers,
2010
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Worcester V. Georgia: A Breakdown In The Separation Of Powers, Matthew L. Sundquist
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
