Choosing Justices: How Presidents Decide,
2011
Saint Louis University School of Law
Choosing Justices: How Presidents Decide, Joel K. Goldstein
All Faculty Scholarship
Presidents play the critical role in determining who will serve as justices on the Supreme Court and their decisions inevitably influence constitutional doctrine and judicial behavior long after their terms have ended. Notwithstanding the impact of these selections, scholars have focused relatively little attention on how presidents decide who to nominate. This article contributes to the literature in the area by advancing three arguments. First, it adopts an intermediate course between the works which tend to treat the subject historically without identifying recurring patterns and those which try to reduce the process to empirical formulas which inevitably obscure considerations shaping …
An Unintended Casualty Of The War On Terror,
2011
University of Colorado Law School
An Unintended Casualty Of The War On Terror, Aya Gruber
Publications
As the dust of the Bush administration's war on terror settles, casualties are starting to appear on the legal battlefield. The United States' human rights reputation and the Supreme Court's international influence lay wounded in the wake of U.S. policies that flouted international law by advocating torture, suborning indefinite detention, and erecting irregular tribunals. Through declining citation, the courts of the world are telling the Supreme Court that if it does not respect international and foreign law, international and foreign courts will not respect it. Some might object that the Supreme Court should not be lumped with the Bush administration …
M.B.Z. V. Clinton: Whither Jerusalem?,
2011
UC Hastings College of the Law
M.B.Z. V. Clinton: Whither Jerusalem?, Calvin R. Massey
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Political Branches And The Law Of Nations,
2010
Notre Dame Law School
The Political Branches And The Law Of Nations, Bradford R. Clark, Anthony J. Bellia Jr.
Journal Articles
In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the U.S. Supreme Court went out of its way to follow background rules of the law of nations, particularly the law of state-state relations. As we have recently argued, the Court followed the law of nations because adherence to such law preserved the constitutional prerogatives of the political branches to conduct foreign relations and decide momentous questions of war and peace. Although we focused primarily on the extent to which the Constitution obligated courts to follow the law of nations in the early republic, the explanation we offered rested on an important, …
Challenging Supremacy: Virginia's Response To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act,
2010
Law Clerk, Hon. Thomas E. Johnston
Challenging Supremacy: Virginia's Response To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act, Matthew R. Farley
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presidents, Preemption, And The States,
2010
University of Baltimore School of Law
Presidents, Preemption, And The States, Michele E. Gilman
All Faculty Scholarship
Early in his administration, President Obama issued a memorandum about preemption that ordered federal agencies to fully consider state interests before preempting state laws. The Obama memorandum was a rebuke to the Bush Administration, which had regularly inserted preemption provisions into federal regulations in areas affecting health, consumer safety, and the environment. As a result of preemption, state laws could not be more protective than federal standards, and corporations were spared state tort lawsuits and state regulatory regimes. Preemption not only tends to pit corporate interests against the public welfare, but it can also undermine federalism. There is currently a …
Once More Unto The Breach: American War Power And A Second Legislative Attempt To Ensure Congressional Input,
2010
Harvard Law School
Once More Unto The Breach: American War Power And A Second Legislative Attempt To Ensure Congressional Input, Jonathan T. Menitove
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Once again embroiled in an unpopular overseas armed conflict, the United States faces difficult questions concerning the constitutional use of military force. Records from the Constitutional Convention suggest the Framers intended to lodge America's power to go to war with the Congress. While American presidents' early use of military force displays deference to the legislature, more recent military actions illustrate the executive's dominance in making war. Notwithstanding a few early court decisions in Congress 's favor, the judiciary has been unhelpful in restoring the constitutional Framers' vision for the administration of the war power Congress, therefore, has been forced to …
In Defense Of The Post-Partisan President: Toward The Boundary Between "Partisan" Advantage And "Political" Choice,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
In Defense Of The Post-Partisan President: Toward The Boundary Between "Partisan" Advantage And "Political" Choice, David C. Weiss
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
"Undead" Wartime Cases: Stare Decisis And The Lessons Of History,
2010
University of Georgia
"Undead" Wartime Cases: Stare Decisis And The Lessons Of History, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
References to the “lessons of history” are ubiquitous in law. Nowhere has this been more apparent than in recent debates over U.S. counterterrorism policy. In response to the Bush Administration’s reliance on World War II-era decisions - Johnson v. Eisentrager, Ex Parte Quirin, Hirota v. MacArthur, and In re Yamashita - opponents have argued that these decisions have been rejected by the “lessons of history.” They argue that the history of wartime cases is one marked by executive aggrandizement, panic-driven attacks on civil liberties, and overly quiescent courts - none of which should be repeated.
But what does it really …
Slides: Energy Development Water Needs Assessment And Water Supply Alternatives And Analysis,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: Energy Development Water Needs Assessment And Water Supply Alternatives And Analysis, Benjamin Harding
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Benjamin Harding, Principal Engineer, AMEC Earth and Environmental
15 slides
Slides: Promise Or Peril: Shale Oil, Energy, And The Region,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: Promise Or Peril: Shale Oil, Energy, And The Region, Chase Huntley
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Chase Huntley, Policy Adviser for Energy & Climate Change, The Wilderness Society
8 slides
Agenda: The Promise And Peril Of Oil Shale Development,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Agenda: The Promise And Peril Of Oil Shale Development, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
The largest known oil shale deposits in the world are in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Fully one-half of the world’s oil shale lies within 150 miles of Grand Junction, Colorado, and about 80% of these reserves are on federal land. Estimates of recoverable reserves in the Green River Formation range from 500 billion to 1.53 trillion barrels. At present consumption rates, this is enough oil to satisfy 100% of U.S. demand for well over 100 years.
Development of oil shale could cause significant impacts on the Colorado Plateau. It would provide for …
Slides: Costs And Benefits Of Oil Shale Development,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: Costs And Benefits Of Oil Shale Development, James T. Bartis
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: James T. Bartis, Senior Policy Researcher, Rand Corporation
21 slides
Slides: The Promise And Peril Of Oil Shale: Federal Law And Policy,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: The Promise And Peril Of Oil Shale: Federal Law And Policy, David Bernhardt
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: David Bernhardt, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Denver, CO
13 slides
Slides: Oil Shale Water Needs, State Water Planning And The Colorado River Compact,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: Oil Shale Water Needs, State Water Planning And The Colorado River Compact, Daniel R. Birch
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Daniel R. Birch, Deputy General Manager & Chief Engineer, Colorado River District
17 slides
Slides: The Logistics And Energy Needs Of Oil Shale Extraction,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: The Logistics And Energy Needs Of Oil Shale Extraction, Alan K. Burnham
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Dr. Alan K. Burnham, Chief Technology Officer, American Shale Oil, LLC
10 slides
Slides: Water For Oil (Shale)?,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: Water For Oil (Shale)?, Bart Miller
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Bart Miller, Water Program Director, Western Resource Advocates
10 slides
Slides: The Peril Of Energy Usage,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: The Peril Of Energy Usage, Mike Tupper
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Mike Tupper, Executive Vice President, Composite Technology Development, Inc.
9 slides
Slides: The History Of Oil Shale Development And What It Means For The Future,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: The History Of Oil Shale Development And What It Means For The Future, Patty Limerick
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Patty Limerick, Center of the American West, University of Colorado at Boulder
35 slides
Slides: The Elusive Bonanza,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Slides: The Elusive Bonanza, Randy Udall
The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
Presenter: Randy Udall, Co-founder, Association for the Study of Peak Oil-USA
62 slides
