Time To Blossom: An Inquiry Into Bloom’S Taxonomy As A Hierarchy And Means For Teaching Legal Research Skills,
2010
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law
Time To Blossom: An Inquiry Into Bloom’S Taxonomy As A Hierarchy And Means For Teaching Legal Research Skills, Paul D. Callister
Faculty Works
Within law librarianship and legal education, there has been far too little scholarly engagement on the underlying pedagogy at the heart of legal research instruction. To correct this deficiency, law librarianship needs to open a dialogue and should consider adapting Bloom’s Taxonomy as a common schema for a collaborative effort.
This paper was initially presented at the "Conference on Legal Information: Scholarship and Teaching," held at the University of Colorado Law School on June 21-22, 2009, as part of its Boulder Summer Conference Series. It follows the author's own recently published challenge to law librarianship and legal research instructors to …
Leveraging A Library Collection Through Collaborative Digitization Ventures,
2010
Cornell Law School
Leveraging A Library Collection Through Collaborative Digitization Ventures, Femi Cadmus, Fred Shapiro
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Bobbitt, The Rise Of The Market State, And Race,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Bobbitt, The Rise Of The Market State, And Race, George A. Martinez
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Meeting Students’ Demand For Models Of Good Legal Writing,
2010
St. John's University School of Law
Meeting Students’ Demand For Models Of Good Legal Writing, Patricia Grande Montana
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
First-year legal writing students always plead for model examples of the types of writing we teach. Though most legal writing texts include an appendix of sample legal documents, the students invariably ask for more. They insist that a multitude of samples are needed to fully grasp the structure and organizational approach that is expected of them. Their reasons for wanting models of good legal writing are not without merit. Interoffice memoranda, trial and appellate briefs, as well as the other kinds of legal documents we teach in the first-year writing curriculum are unlike anything our law students have previously …
The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching & Scholarship,
2010
St. John's University School of Law
The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching & Scholarship, Robin Boyle
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
BRITTANY FLOWE: Welcome everyone. I am Brittany Flowe, the Lead Articles editor of the Mercer Law Review. On behalf of all the students and faculty, we are truly grateful for your presence here today. We are excited and honored to be celebrating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Legal Writing Institute. Thank you all for being here; we are looking forward to a wonderful panel. Now, I would like to introduce Dean Daisy Hurst Floyd.
DEAN DAISY FLOYD: Thank you everyone. Good morning. It is my great privilege to welcome you to Macon, to Mercer University, and to Mercer University's …
The Relevance Of Results Generated By Human Indexing And Computer Algorithms: A Study Of West's Headnotes And Key Numbers And Lexisnexis's Headnotes And Topics,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
The Relevance Of Results Generated By Human Indexing And Computer Algorithms: A Study Of West's Headnotes And Key Numbers And Lexisnexis's Headnotes And Topics, Susan Nevelow Mart
Publications
This article begins the investigation into the different ways results are generated in West's "Custom Digest" and in LexisNexis's "Search by Topic or Headnote" and by KeyCite and Shepard's. The author took ten pairs of matching headnotes from important federal and California cases and reviewed the results sets generated by each classification and citator system for relevance. The differences in the results sets for classification systems and for citator systems raise interesting issues about the efficiency and comprehensiveness of any one system, and the need to adjust research strategies accordingly
Penumbral Thinking Revisited: Metaphor In Legal Argumentation,
2010
Seattle University School of Law
Penumbral Thinking Revisited: Metaphor In Legal Argumentation, Chris Rideout
Faculty Articles
In the modern jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court, the controversy over the place of metaphor came directly into the spotlight in Griswold v. Connecticut. Justice Douglas, writing for the majority and relying in part on metaphoric reasoning for his argument, located a right to privacy in the penumbral area formed by emanations from specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights. The various opinions in Griswold represent a divide regarding the place of metaphoric reasoning in legal argument. Justice Douglas employs metaphoric reasoning, while several of his fellow justices either avoid it or reject it. Because the case has …
Discipline-Building And Disciplinary Values: Thoughts On Legal Writing At Year Twenty-Five Of The Legal Writing Institute,
2010
Seattle University School of Law
Discipline-Building And Disciplinary Values: Thoughts On Legal Writing At Year Twenty-Five Of The Legal Writing Institute, J. Christopher Rideout
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Legal Writing: The View From Within,
2010
Seattle University School of Law
Legal Writing: The View From Within, J. Christopher Rideout, Jill J. Ramsfield
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Tributes To Mary S. Lawrence,
2010
Seattle University School of Law
Front Matter,
2010
St. Thomas University College of Law
Front Matter
Intercultural Human Rights Law Review
Front Matter includes Masthead, advisors, and Table of Contents for the Intercultural Human Rights Law Review Volume 5 (2010).
Waging War Within The Constitution,
2010
Belmont University - College of Law
Waging War Within The Constitution, Alberto R. Gonzales
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the United States' response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda from my perspective as Counsel to the President and then later as Attorney General. It reviews the actions of government lawyers and how federal courts have judged the implementation of U.S. government policy. It explains that U.S. government officials quickly understood that our nation was confronted with a non-state enemy fighting an unconventional war. This forced us to make a number of difficult decisions quickly about how best to fight this threat in a manner consistent with the United States' domestic and international legal …
Good Enough For Government Work: The Interpretation Of Positive Constitutional Rights In State Constitutions,
2010
Belmont University - College of Law
Good Enough For Government Work: The Interpretation Of Positive Constitutional Rights In State Constitutions, Jeffrey Omar Usman
Law Faculty Scholarship
The United States Supreme Court ruled in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) and reaffirmed in Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) that absent conditions of confinement the Due Process Clause imposes no affirmative obligations upon government to protect an individual’s life, liberty, or property. These decisions reflect the Supreme Court’s broader understanding of the United States Constitution as a guarantor of negative rights but devoid of assurance of positive rights. Like the constitutions of many other countries, state constitutions have charted a different course. Unlike their federal counterpart, state …
Introduction To Symposium: Reasoning From Literature,
2010
Boston University School of Law
Introduction To Symposium: Reasoning From Literature, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
The “literary turn” in legal studies manifests in many ways in our legal discipline and practice. Be it with the birth of the study of law and literature in the 1980s, the growing attention to narrative theory and storytelling in the law in the 1990s, or the “cultural turn” in legal studies in the 21st century (as some scholars have called the cultural analysis of law), reasoning from literature seems commonplace. And yet it is still marginalized in legal studies as interdisciplinary, not “really law,” and lacking the core persuasive power that legal argumentation and doctrinal analysis do. This Symposium …
A Writing Life,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
A Writing Life, Linda H. Edwards
Scholarly Works
This essay was written on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Legal Writing Institute (LWI), celebrated at Mercer University School of Law, LWI’s current home. In a sense the essay is retrospective, for it is written to honor the scholars whose work has moved us toward a vision of legal writing scholarship and all it can offer. Many of those experienced and inspiring scholars have kindly offered their advice for inclusion in this essay. That advice is probably the most important content included here, and it is placed, appropriately, at the end of the text as the essay’s …
Symposium, The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching And Scholarship,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Symposium, The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching And Scholarship, Linda H. Edwards
Scholarly Works
This is the transcript of Mercer Law Review’s Symposium, The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years of Teaching & Scholarship. In this Symposium Linda Edwards, among other panelists, discussed the work that goes into producing scholarship.
The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching & Scholarship,
2010
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
The Legal Writing Institute: Celebrating 25 Years Of Teaching & Scholarship, Mary Beth Beazley
Scholarly Works
Professor Beazley joins a panel of the elite of legal writing professors at Mercer University, celebrating the 25th anniversary of the Legal Writing Institute in this transcript of the proceedings.
Writer's Block: The "Ins And Outs" Of Good Legal Writing, Part One,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Writer's Block: The "Ins And Outs" Of Good Legal Writing, Part One, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Misplaced Modifiers - Say What,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Misplaced Modifiers - Say What, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Writer's Block: Why Punctuation Matters, Part Two,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Writer's Block: Why Punctuation Matters, Part Two, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
