Comparing Single-Sex And Reformed Coeducation: A Constitutional Analysis,
2012
University of San Diego
Comparing Single-Sex And Reformed Coeducation: A Constitutional Analysis, Nancy Chi Cantalupo
San Diego Law Review
One of the most enduring educational debates of the past three decades has dealt with the legality and advisability of sex-segregated education. This debate can often look confusing, given a large number of debaters and the diversity of their perspectives and agendas. More than this diversity, however, the debate is confusing because the debate has been structured as a contest between the "innovation" of sex-segregated education and status quo coeducation. Missing from the debate is a comparison between reformed coeducation and a single-sex alternative, a comparison that is markedly more useful in determining what ought to be done about the …
Davis V. Monroe County Board Of Education: Setting A Stringent Standard Of Fault For School Liability In Peer Sexual Harassment Under Title Ix-Demanding Responsible Proactive Protection,
2012
Pepperdine University
Davis V. Monroe County Board Of Education: Setting A Stringent Standard Of Fault For School Liability In Peer Sexual Harassment Under Title Ix-Demanding Responsible Proactive Protection, Lindsay Havern
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cedar Rapids Community School District V. Garret F.: A High Price For Equal Education ,
2012
Pepperdine University
Cedar Rapids Community School District V. Garret F.: A High Price For Equal Education , Kristie Harding
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Special Education Case Law Iceberg: An Initial Exploration Of The Underside,
2012
University of South Carolina
The Special Education Case Law Iceberg: An Initial Exploration Of The Underside, Perry A. Zirkel, Amanda C. Machin
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Charter School Revocation: A Method For Efficiency, Accountability, And Success,
2012
University of South Carolina
Charter School Revocation: A Method For Efficiency, Accountability, And Success, Dylan P. Grady
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Review Recent Cases & Commentary,
2012
University of South Carolina
Supreme Court Review Recent Cases & Commentary
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Lower Federal Courts And State Courts Recent Cases & Commentary,
2012
University of South Carolina
Lower Federal Courts And State Courts Recent Cases & Commentary
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Evading The Tweet Bomb: Utilizing Financial Aid Agreements To Avoid First Amendment Litigation And Ncaa Sanctions,
2012
University of South Carolina
Evading The Tweet Bomb: Utilizing Financial Aid Agreements To Avoid First Amendment Litigation And Ncaa Sanctions, Patrick Stubblefield
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Bullying Victimization As A Disability In Public Elementary And Secondary Education,
2012
University of Missouri School of Law
Bullying Victimization As A Disability In Public Elementary And Secondary Education, Douglas E. Abrams
Faculty Publications
This article discusses two reasons why likening bullying victimization to an educational disability makes sense. First, face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying impose on student victims the sort of educational deprivation that the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) addresses in the disabilities arena. Second, today’s belated public sensitivity to school bullying victims resembles the belated public sensitivity to students with disabilities that led to passage of the IDEA in 1975.
Governing Badly: Theory And Practice Of Bad Ideas In College Decision Making,
2012
University of Houston - Main
Governing Badly: Theory And Practice Of Bad Ideas In College Decision Making, Michael A. Olivas
Indiana Law Journal
Jerome Hall Lecture, Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Bloomington, Indiana, January, 2011.
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying,
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
How Not To Criminalize Cyberbullying, Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Andrea Garcia
UF Law Faculty Publications
This essay provides a sustained constitutional critique of the growing body of laws criminalizing cyberbullying. These laws typically proceed by either modernizing existing harassment and stalking laws or crafting new criminal offenses. Both paths are beset with First Amendment perils, which this essay illustrates through 'case studies' of selected legislative efforts. Though sympathetic to the aims of these new laws, this essay contends that reflexive criminalization in response to tragic cyberbullying incidents has led law-makers to conflate cyberbullying as a social problem with cyberbullying as a criminal problem, creating pernicious consequences. The legislative zeal to eradicate cyberbullying potentially produces disproportionate …
Table Of Contents,
2012
University of South Carolina
Commentary - Primary & Secondary Education,
2012
University of South Carolina
Commentary - Primary & Secondary Education
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Adderall Abuse: Regulating The Academic Steroid,
2012
University of South Carolina
Adderall Abuse: Regulating The Academic Steroid, Stefanie Stolz
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
The Other Achievement Gap: Court-Dependent Youth And Educational Advocacy,
2012
University of South Carolina
The Other Achievement Gap: Court-Dependent Youth And Educational Advocacy, Jesse Hahnel, Caroline Van Zile
The Journal of Law and Education
No abstract provided.
Dead Document Walking,
2012
Boston Univeristy School of Law
Dead Document Walking, Gary S. Lawson
Faculty Scholarship
As this symposium commences, originalism is a hot topic to discuss and a cool position to advocate. Either portion of that statement would have been nearly inconceivable two decades ago when I started in academia. Originalism at that time was something of an intellectual backwater, with a very limited set of adherents and an even more limited set of critics who were willing to take originalist ideas seriously.1
The Playground Bully Has Gone Digital: The Dangers Of Cyberbullying, The First Amendment Implications, And The Necessary Responses,
2012
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Playground Bully Has Gone Digital: The Dangers Of Cyberbullying, The First Amendment Implications, And The Necessary Responses, Jamie Wolf
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note argues that cyberbullying has evolved into a significant issue in the digital age, requiring a reevaluation of First Amendment protections and legislative responses. It critiques the current legal framework, particularly the Tinker v. Des Moines standard, for failing to adequately address off-campus speech that impacts the school environment. The author advocates for a balanced approach that protects victims while ensuring due process, emphasizing the need for comprehensive statutes and proactive measures by schools and parents.
Are Charters Enough Choice? School Choice And The Future Of Catholic Schools,
2012
Notre Dame Law School
Are Charters Enough Choice? School Choice And The Future Of Catholic Schools, Nicole Stelle Garnett
Journal Articles
An essay is presented on Catholic and charter schools and the closing of such schools in the U.S. The academic performance, parental involvement and the after-school religious education targeted for charter school students is discussed. The connections between the Catholic and charter schools and the legal issues governing conversion to charter schools is also discussed along with the concerns in the urban community due the closure of Catholic schools.
The Inheritance Of Inequality: Hukou<.I> And Related Barriers To Compulsory Education For China's Migrant Children,
2012
University of Washington School of Law
The Inheritance Of Inequality: Hukou<.I> And Related Barriers To Compulsory Education For China's Migrant Children, Jessica L. Montgomery
Washington International Law Journal
The hukou system in China uses residency permits to divide Chinese citizens into urban and rural dwellers. A person’s hukou status determines his or her access to state services. Under normal circumstances, a person with a rural hukou status is not eligible for state services in urban areas, and vice versa. Because hukou is primarily inherited from one’s parents at the time of birth, children born in urban areas to parents with rural hukou are similarly designated as rural hukou holders. As a result, children living in cities with rural hukou are ineligible for enrollment in urban public schools even …
The Parental Choice Fallacy In Education Reform Debates,
2012
William & Mary Law School
The Parental Choice Fallacy In Education Reform Debates, James G. Dwyer
Faculty Publications
Some tout parental school choice as a strategy for promoting, among other school-related goods, educational innovation. This Article offers clarifying and skeptical thoughts about that position. It first explains what “educational innovation” and “parental choice” mean. It then considers what limitations on this strategy might arise from existing legal regulations, from market forces, or from ethical obligations to children. Finally, the Article explains why parental choice is also unlikely to improve education for the children most in need of a better academic environment and suggests an alternative approach to student reassignment that is much more likely to do so.
