Constitutional Law Commons^™

Indonesia's Position Based On The Australian Asean New Zealand Free Trade Agreement And Its Impact From A Business La W Perspective, Ariawan Gunadi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Constitutional Question (Menyoal Konstltusjonalitas Pasal Tentang Pengemis Kuhp Pasal 504 Ayat (1) Dan (2)), Isrok Isrok

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

The Necessity Of Capacity Building For Indonesia's Effective Utilization Of Wto Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Implementation Of Gait Article Xx For Trade And Environment Issues, Windu Kisworo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peran Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Ujang Bahar

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Norma Kesusilaan Sebagai Batasan Pornografi Menurut Undang-Undang No. 44 Tahun 2008, Hwian Christianto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Investigasi Pendek Atas Kesejarahan Teori Hukum, Selaku Disiplin Yang Mengemban Misi Teoretikal Bidang Hukum, Rahadjeng Endah Ks.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Analisa Law And Economics Atas Kompensasi Dan Asuransi Lingkungan Di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Atas Kompensasi Tanpa Sistem, Andri Gunawan Wibisana, Pramita K. Putri

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peresepan Dokter: Organized Crime?, Agus Budianto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Catatan Singkat Mengenai Kedudukan Mpr Sesudah Perubahan Uud 1945, Fatmawati Fatmawati

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Proses Demokratisasi Di Indonesia Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pendidik Dan Tenaga Kependidikan Pada Jalur Pendidikan Non Formal (Ptk Pnf) Melalui Lkbh, Hendra Nurtjahjo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjamin Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Pada Proses Demokratisasi Di Indonesia, Mutiara Hikmah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Anak Nakal: Diversi Dan Dilema Penerapannya, Eva Achjani Zulfa

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Tinjauan Atas Permasalahan Yang Timbul Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Aji Sekarmaji

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kata Menuntut Atau Vorderen Dalam Pasal 1156 Ayat (1) Kuhperdata Adalah Suatu Upaya Hukum Permohonan (Suatu Pemahaman Dasar Dan Mendalam), Teddy Anggoro

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pembaharuan Makna Asas Legalitas, Hwian Christianto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Corporate Control Transaction In Acquisition Under The Indonesian Law, David Kairupan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peraturan Hukum Perburuhan Dan Sikap Pengadilan: Tarikmenarik Antara Kepentingan Investor Dan Kepentingan Buruh, Syamsul Khoiri

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Atas Lingkungan Hidup (Suatu Rekfleksi Sosio Yuridis Atas Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan), Junior B. Gregorius

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

U.S. V. Washington: Considering The Continuing Injunction Of The Boldt Decision, Nicholas Brown

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Judge George Hugo Boldt’s 1974 opinion in United States v. Washington was a landmark decision in the recognition of treaty fishing rights for tribes in western Washington. Not only did it recognize the entitlement to 50% of harvestable yields of fish within the tribes’ usual and accustomed fishing sites, but it also provided a permanent injunction to protect future fishing rights for generations to come. Now, over fifty years since the original “Boldt decision” was made, judges in the Ninth Circuit are debating whether the continued injunction to litigate intertribal disputes over treaty fishing rights is proper. This article considers …

Western Watersheds Project V. Schultz, Cv 22-149-M-Dlc-Kld, 2025 Lx 449507, 2025 Wl 2410283 (D. Mont. Mar. 27, 2025), Luke A. Zagar

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Western Watersheds Project v. Schultz delineates what the Forest Service is required to consider for revising Allotment Management Plans as prescribed by NEPA. Environmental plaintiffs sued, arguing that the Forest Service’s reliance on an older baseline assessment was arbitrary and capricious and that the revised AMP failed to consider major impacts on the grizzly bear population. The District of Montana held that the reliance on an older baseline assessment was acceptable but simultaneously found the AMP to be arbitrary and capricious under the “hard look” standard.