Constitutional Law Commons^™

Modernisasi Hukum Notaris Masa Depan: Kajlan Hukum Terhadap Kemungkinan Cybernotary Di Indonesia, Edmon Makarim

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Director's Duty To Employees: At The Borders Of Corpora Te Law And Labour Law, Hesty D. Lestari

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Eksistensi Hukum Adat Dalam Konstltusi Negara Pasca Amandemen Uud 1945, Yanis Maladi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kemungkinan Peraturan Perundangan·Undangan Di Bawah Undang-Undang Sebagai Obyek Pengujian Mahkamah Konstltusi, Thorkis Pane

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Artl Pentlng Pemberlakuan Uu No. 1/Pnps/1965, Hwian Christianto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk) Di Indonesia (Kajlan Yuridis Terhadap Permasalahan Dan Kendala-Kendala Bpsk), Kurniawan Kurniawan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kebijakan Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah Pasca Reformasi, Faisal Akbar Nasution

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Analisis Penguatan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sebagai Lembaga Parlemen Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Dl Indonesia, Fatmawati Fatmawati

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pendanaan Terorisme Di Peroleh Dari Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering), H.M. Abdi Koro

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Politik Dan Birokrasi Dl Negara Bagian Sabah Malaysia (Studi Kasus Intervensi Pejabat Politik Terhadap Pejabat Birokrasi), Azhari Azhari

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Aspek Pidana Di Atas Kereta Rel Listrik/Diesel Reguler (Ekonomi) Dalam Wilayah Jabodetabek, I. Sriyanto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Public Use On The Loose: Clarifying The Takings Clause’S Public Use Requirement, Megan Hoefs

Pepperdine Law Review

The Fifth Amendment permits the taking of private property for “public use,” but modern courts refuse to question legislative determinations of that use. Although the Supreme Court has implicitly reserved a prohibition on takings done under a “mere pretext of public purpose,” lower courts are unsure of how to identify or evaluate such pretext. This Comment argues that the Public Use Clause requires a showing of good faith to be constitutionally sufficient. By reframing public use around good faith, this Comment offers a modest but necessary clarification that preserves the structure of existing doctrine while restoring the Clause’s function as …

Open And Shut: Non-Removal Statutesand Door-Closing Penalties, Isaac Zwerling

Pepperdine Law Review

There is a longstanding tension in the Court’s treatment of non-removal statutes and door-closing penalties. On the one hand, the Court has held non-removal statutes—business registration statutes that condition a foreign corporation’s license on that corporation’s right to remove cases brought against it to federal court—pose an unconstitutional limit on federal court access. On the other, the Court has extended door-closing penalties statutes prohibiting unregistered foreign corporations from initiating an action in the forum state—to federal courts sitting in diversity. This Article surveys how the Court arrived at this puzzling result. It does so by analyzing each line of cases …

The Interpretive Force Of Alexander Hamilton’S Early Expositions Of Presidential Power, Michael Stokes Paulsen

Pepperdine Law Review

The most important, rightly influential, early interpretations of the Constitution on presidential power concerning matters of war, peace, and foreign affairs flowed from the able pen of Alexander Hamilton in three sets of pseudonymous public essays: as “Publius” in The Federalist (1787–1788); as “Pacificus” (1793–1794); and “Camillus” (1795–1796). As Publius, Hamilton expounded a broad understanding of presidential constitutional power generally and of presidential power in war and foreign affairs specifically, including an essentially plenary Commander-in-Chief power over the conduct of authorized war (but with no constitutional power to initiate war: that power being explicitly and exclusively assigned to Congress). As …

Judicial Appointments Before Vacancies, Vasan Kesavan

Pepperdine Law Review

Appointments are about power—presidential power. There is no greater presidential appointment power than the power to appoint federal judges who are expected to serve for life. Judicial appointments allow the President to shape one branch of the federal government for decades to come, perhaps decisively, thereby helping to define his legacy. Of all judicial appointments, there is nothing more significant than appointments to the Supreme Court, if the President even has the opportunity during his term. But these appointments are the most difficult for the President to make in the most partisan political period in our lifetimes. May a President, …

Pengaruh Polltik Luar Negeri Terhadap Struktur Masyarakat Hukum Internasional Dan Paradigma Hukum Positif Berkemanusiaan, Muhammad Ridwan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Proporsionalitas Penjatuhan Pidana, Eva Achjani

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Substansi Pengaturan Hukum Daerah Kepulauan, Johanis Laetemia

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Implementasi Undang-Undang Arbitrase Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia (Memasuki 12 Tahun Usia Undang-Undang Arbitrase), Mutiara Hikmah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Mengkritisi Rancangan Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Pembangunan, Suatu Catatan Kritis, Imam Koeswahyono

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract