Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

State and Local Government Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

16,690 Full-Text Articles 11,569 Authors 8,425,690 Downloads 191 Institutions

All Articles in State and Local Government Law

Faceted Search

16,690 full-text articles. Page 152 of 296.

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk Sr. 2019 Whitaker Chalk Swindle & Schwartz PLLC

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk Sr.

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.


Intellectual Property Law, David McCombs, Phillip B. Philbin, Brett Bostrom, Katharyn Zagorin 2019 Haynes and Boone, LLP

Intellectual Property Law, David Mccombs, Phillip B. Philbin, Brett Bostrom, Katharyn Zagorin

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.


Franchise Law, Deborah S. Coldwell, Sally Dahlstrom, Iris Gibson, Taylor Rex Robertson 2019 Haynes and Boone, LLP

Franchise Law, Deborah S. Coldwell, Sally Dahlstrom, Iris Gibson, Taylor Rex Robertson

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.


Understanding State Agency Independence, Miriam Seifter 2019 University of Wisconsin Law School

Understanding State Agency Independence, Miriam Seifter

Michigan Law Review

Conflicts about the independence of executive branch officials are brewing across the states. Governors vie with separately elected executive officials for policy control; attorneys general and governors spar over who speaks for the state in litigation, and legislatures seek to alter governors’ influence over independent state commissions. These disputes over intrastate authority have weighty policy implications both within states and beyond them, on topics from election administration and energy markets to healthcare and welfare. The disputes also reveal a blind spot. At the federal level, scholars have long analyzed the meaning and effects of agency independence—a dialogue that has deepened …


The New Housing Segregation: The Jim Crow Effects Of Crime-Free Housing Ordinances, Deborah N. Archer 2019 New York University School of Law

The New Housing Segregation: The Jim Crow Effects Of Crime-Free Housing Ordinances, Deborah N. Archer

Michigan Law Review

America is profoundly segregated along racial lines. We attend separate schools, live in separate neighborhoods, attend different churches, and shop at different stores. This rigid racial segregation results in social, economic, and resource inequality, with White communities of opportunity on the one hand and many communities of color without access to quality schools, jobs, transportation, or health care on the other. Many people view this as an unfortunate fact of life, or as a relic of legal systems long since overturned and beyond the reach of current legal process. But this is not true. On the contrary, the law continues …


Home Rule In Ohio: General Laws, Conflicts, And The Failure Of The Courts To Protect The Ohio Constitution, Matthew Mahoney 2019 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Home Rule In Ohio: General Laws, Conflicts, And The Failure Of The Courts To Protect The Ohio Constitution, Matthew Mahoney

Cleveland State Law Review

The Home Rule Amendment to Ohio’s Constitution vest with municipalities the power to legislate on issues of most concern to that locality. Ideally, the concept of home rule creates shared powers between the state and the municipality. However, in Ohio, such is not the case. Instead, the state has almost complete control despite the home rule constitutional amendment. Although home rule is complicated historically and practically with many working parts between the legislature and the municipality, what is clear is that the courts play a substantial role in the doctrine’s application. The court’s role is difficulty considering the competing interests, …


A New Era In Juvenile Sentencing: Why Montgomery, Adolescent Neuroscience, And A Shift In The National Conversation Point Toward A Need For Measure 11 Reform, Joshua Olmsted 2019 Lewis & Clark Law School

A New Era In Juvenile Sentencing: Why Montgomery, Adolescent Neuroscience, And A Shift In The National Conversation Point Toward A Need For Measure 11 Reform, Joshua Olmsted

Lewis & Clark Law Review

In 1994, Oregon voters passed Ballot Measure 11, a mandatory minimum sentencing scheme that imposes long inflexible sentences for a plethora of serious crimes. In addition to establishing mandatory minimum sentences, Measure 11 dramatically re-shaped the landscape of the juvenile justice system by mandating transfer to adult court for youth between 15 and 17 years old, charged with any Measure 11 offense, even if they are eventually convicted of a lesser offense. In recent years, there has been a push to rethink the way that we evaluate and treat juvenile offenders. Evolving Supreme Court jurisprudence, along with new research into …


A Hybrid Approach To Marijuana Federalism, Susan F. Mandiberg 2019 Lewis & Clark Law School

A Hybrid Approach To Marijuana Federalism, Susan F. Mandiberg

Lewis & Clark Law Review

With the evident indulgence of the United States Department of Justice, states are jumping on the bandwagon of legalizing medicinal and recreational marijuana even though marijuana use is criminalized under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. The possibility that the federal government will at some point decriminalize marijuana use poses a challenge for the construction of a regulatory framework. In short, how should the states and the federal government divide regulatory responsibilities?

There has been significant academic discussion about possible regulatory frameworks to address this issue. Drawing upon existing federalism schemes in the environmental and natural resource area, this Article reviews …


State Standing And Cooperative Federalism, Ernest A. Young 2019 Duke Law School

State Standing And Cooperative Federalism, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

State lawsuits challenging federal policy generally encounter arguments that the states lack standing to sue, either under Article III’s “case or controversy” clause or under various prudential standing doctrines. These arguments have often taken novel forms—such as claims that states’ injuries are “self-inflicted” or offset by other benefits of federal policies—that have few precedents or analogs in the standing jurisprudence governing suits by private individuals. The United States has taken the position, in other words, that states should have special disabilities in filing lawsuits that would not apply to ordinary litigants. Likewise, prominent academics have argued that uniquely narrow standing …


The Ethical (Or Not So Ethical) Story Behind Your Bar Of Chocolate: The Untold Tale Of A Distressed Ghanaian Farmer, Nadia Ayensah 2019 Augustana College, Rock Island Illinois

The Ethical (Or Not So Ethical) Story Behind Your Bar Of Chocolate: The Untold Tale Of A Distressed Ghanaian Farmer, Nadia Ayensah

Augustana Center for the Study of Ethics Essay Contest

In a time where the ethics of business dealings have become a key factor in the likelihood of the success of that venture due to globalization, it is important to start considering those ventures that are so popular, but whose inner working are rarely heard of. This paper analyzes the history and process of cocoa production in Ghana. It looks at the status quo with regards to the social and economic standing of Ghanaian Cocoa farmers as opposed to the earnings made by cocoa processing companies. With the statistics derived, the paper then considers who is to take responsibility for …


Separation Of Powers In New Mexico: Item Vetoes, State Policy-Making, And The Role Of State Courts, Michael B. Browde 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Separation Of Powers In New Mexico: Item Vetoes, State Policy-Making, And The Role Of State Courts, Michael B. Browde

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


School Finance Litigation And The Separation Of Powers, Larry J. Obhof 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

School Finance Litigation And The Separation Of Powers, Larry J. Obhof

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


State Courts And Democratic Theory: Toward A Theory Of State Constitutional Judicial Review, David Schultz 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

State Courts And Democratic Theory: Toward A Theory Of State Constitutional Judicial Review, David Schultz

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


Neither Fish Nor Fowl: The Separation Of Powers And The Office Of Administrative Hearings, Ann E. Cohen, Elise Larson 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Neither Fish Nor Fowl: The Separation Of Powers And The Office Of Administrative Hearings, Ann E. Cohen, Elise Larson

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


The “Law Of Ramsey County” – Reflections Of A Trial Judge On State Government Gridlock, Kathleen Gearin 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

The “Law Of Ramsey County” – Reflections Of A Trial Judge On State Government Gridlock, Kathleen Gearin

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


Partisan Gerrymandering: Blurring The Line Between Law And Politics, Elizabeth M. Brama, Lauren E. Pockl, Samuel Louwagie 2019 Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Partisan Gerrymandering: Blurring The Line Between Law And Politics, Elizabeth M. Brama, Lauren E. Pockl, Samuel Louwagie

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry 2019 Penn State Dickinson Law

When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the Supreme Court declined to extend these Due Process rights to children. Initially, common-law courts treated child offenders over the age of seven in the same manner as adult criminals. At the start of the 20th century, though, juvenile reformers assisted in creating unique juvenile courts that used the parens patriae doctrine and viewed children as delinquent youths in need of judicial parental guidance rather than punishment. Later, starting in 1967, the Supreme Court released multiple opinions extending certain constitutional Due Process rights to children in juvenile delinquency …


Judges Do It Better: Why Judges Can (And Should) Decide Life Or Death, Andrew R. Ford 2019 Penn State Dickinson Law

Judges Do It Better: Why Judges Can (And Should) Decide Life Or Death, Andrew R. Ford

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

Following its decision in Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court of the United States has attempted to standardize procedures that states use to subject offenders to the ultimate penalty. In practice, this attempt at standardization has divided capital sentencing into two distinct parts: the death eligibility decision and the death selection decision. The eligibility decision addresses whether the sentencer may impose the death penalty, while the selection decision determines who among that limited subset of eligible offenders is sentenced to death. In Ring v. Arizona, the Court held for the first time that the Sixth Amendment right to …


A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen 2019 Penn State Dickinson Law

A Gun To Whose Head? Federalism, Localism, And The Spending Clause, Daniel S. Cohen

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

President Trump’s executive order rescinding federal funds from “sanctuary jurisdictions” has brought a critical, but overlooked, question of constitutional law to the forefront of the political debate: how does the Spending Clause apply to local governments? The purpose of the Spending Clause is to empower the federal government to bargain with the states to enact policies it cannot enact itself. This power, however, is constrained within the confines of federalism. The Supreme Court has sought to restrict the Spending Clause by crafting the Dole-NFIB framework, a test to determine whether a federal grant has compromised federalism. At its …


Pennsylvania’S Need For Permanency: An Argument In Support Of Workable Standards For Representing Children In Involuntary Termination Of Parental Rights Proceedings, Anne M. Bingaman 2019 Penn State Dickinson Law

Pennsylvania’S Need For Permanency: An Argument In Support Of Workable Standards For Representing Children In Involuntary Termination Of Parental Rights Proceedings, Anne M. Bingaman

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

In cases of child abuse and neglect, Pennsylvania’s dependency laws both empower courts to act to protect the child and offer opportunities to bolster the parent-child relationship. However, when courts determine that maintenance of the parent-child relationship is not in the child’s best interest, termination of parental rights proceedings play an essential role in freeing the child for adoption.

Pennsylvania’s General Assembly has recognized that termination proceedings are both a necessary mechanism for permanency and a significant intrusion in the life of a child. As a result, the General Assembly enacted 23 PA. CONST. STAT. § 2313(a), a provision in …


Digital Commons powered by bepress