Medical Board Of California,
2019
University of San Diego
Medical Board Of California, Angela O'Hara, Debra Jorgensen
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Veterinary Medical Board,
2019
University of San Diego
Veterinary Medical Board, Christine Lambert, Bridget Fogarty Gramme
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Public Utilities Commission,
2019
University of San Diego
Public Utilities Commission, Michael J. Melton, Marcus Friedman, Strider Kachelein, R C. Fellmeth
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Calvo V. Montgomery County: The Decision Of Whether A Trip Falls Under The Special Mission Exception To The Going And Coming Rule Is For The Jury, Not Summary Judgment,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Calvo V. Montgomery County: The Decision Of Whether A Trip Falls Under The Special Mission Exception To The Going And Coming Rule Is For The Jury, Not Summary Judgment, Adrián Martinez
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Ramirez V. State,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Ramirez V. State, Eunice Ahaghotu
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Romero V. Perez,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Romero V. Perez, Morgan Lynch
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Florida's Direct File Statute: A Prosecutor's Playground,
2019
St. Thomas University College of Law
Florida's Direct File Statute: A Prosecutor's Playground, Kristen Chirino
St. Thomas Law Review
This Comment will examine the advantages and disadvantages of direct file statutes, focusing primarily on Florida. Part II of this Comment analyzes the three different types of waiver-judicial, legislative, and prosecutorial-and discusses Florida's juvenile transfer laws, specifically Florida's direct file statute. Part III discusses the issues stemming from Florida's direct file statute, particularly that the statute is arbitrary, does not deter crime, increases recidivism, and goes against the Supreme Court finding that juveniles are different from adults. Lastly, Part IV proposes to eliminate discretionary prosecutorial direct file, and how the Florida Legislature can limit prosecutors' discretionary power in the meantime.
Florida Needs To Protect Grandma & Grandpa,
2019
St. Thomas University College of Law
Florida Needs To Protect Grandma & Grandpa, Jessica A. Alvarez
St. Thomas Law Review
This Comment discusses how amending Florida Senate Bill 896 ("S.B. 896") to incorporate more specific language regarding who can consent to electronic monitoring devices in the residents' rooms will help it pass and become part of Section 400.022, Florida Statutes." Part II will examine the current law in Florida and the attempts to amend it. Part III will explain that allowing electronic monitoring devices is in the best interest of both the resident and the nursing home, and will touch upon issues regarding expectations of privacy." Lastly, Part IV proposes to change the language of S.B. 896 so that it …
The Maryland Trust Act: The Fate Of The Unknowledgeable Beneficiary,
2019
Franke, Sessions & Beckett, LLC.
The Maryland Trust Act: The Fate Of The Unknowledgeable Beneficiary, Fred Franke, Deb Howe
University of Baltimore Law Forum
When adopting its version of the Uniform Trust Code (the "UTC"), Maryland
made two modifications to the UTC that potentially reduced the ability of trust
beneficiaries to enforce their rights. First, the Maryland Trust Act ("MTA")
did not include the UTC requirement that a trustee shall keep beneficiaries
reasonably informed about the administration of the trust and of material facts
necessary to protect their interests regardless of whether the beneficiary
requests such information. Second, Maryland added to the “virtual
representation” provisions of the MTA that a settlor can designate a
representative regardless of the beneficiary's age or capacity to receive …
Recent Developments: Prince V. Murdy,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Prince V. Murdy, Sean T. Keene
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
University Of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 50, Number 1 (Fall 2019),
2019
University of Baltimore Law
University Of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 50, Number 1 (Fall 2019)
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
The So-Called “New” Provisions Of The Maryland Commercial Receivership Act,
2019
Whiteford Taylor & Preston, LLP
The So-Called “New” Provisions Of The Maryland Commercial Receivership Act, Paul M. Nussbaum, Todd M. Brooks, G. Richard Gray
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Smith V. Wakefield,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Smith V. Wakefield, Daniel W. Pei
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Are Carve-Outs Killing The Spirit Of Sanctuary Cities? A Comparative Analysis Of Chicago And Oak Park’S Sanctuary Policies, 52 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 395 (2019),
2019
UIC School of Law
Are Carve-Outs Killing The Spirit Of Sanctuary Cities? A Comparative Analysis Of Chicago And Oak Park’S Sanctuary Policies, 52 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 395 (2019), Ana Torres
UIC Law Review
In the United States, undocumented immigrants often shy away from accessing public services due to fear of deportation. Chicago and Oak Park have passed ordinances commonly known as “sanctuary policies,” which seek to promote trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement in order to lower crime rates and increase public safety. The rationale is that undocumented immigrants will feel more confident to report crimes and utilize public and social services without fear of repercussions. Sanctuary policies strive to create basic protections for undocumented immigrants at a local level by limiting cooperation with the federal government. However, many sanctuary policies …
Research Resources For Michigan Criminal Law,
2019
University of Michigan Law School
Research Resources For Michigan Criminal Law, Kate E. Britt
Law Librarian Scholarship
Few areas of the law are as consequential to the personal lives of those involved as criminal law. The law can, and does, change quickly, and attorneys need to stay abreast of the latest developments to effectively represent their clients. Thankfully, modern government bodies publish current primary law (and many useful secondary sources) online. The sites outlined below will take users to reliable sources of Michigan criminal law and procedure.
Recent Developments: Reynolds V. State,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Reynolds V. State, Meghan M. Mcdonald
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Washington Gas Light Company V. Maryland Public Service Commission,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Washington Gas Light Company V. Maryland Public Service Commission, Nicholas A. Tomso
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
University Of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 49, Number 2 (Spring 2019),
2019
University of Baltimore Law
University Of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 49, Number 2 (Spring 2019)
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust V. Busch,
2019
University of Baltimore Law
Recent Developments: Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust V. Busch, Curtis Paul
University of Baltimore Law Forum
No abstract provided.
Properly Accounting For Domestic Violence In Child Custody Cases: An Evidence-Based Analysis And Reform Proposal,
2019
The John Marshall Law School
Properly Accounting For Domestic Violence In Child Custody Cases: An Evidence-Based Analysis And Reform Proposal, Debra Pogrund Stark, Jessica M. Choplin, Sarah Elizabeth Wellard
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
Promoting the best interests of children and protecting their safety and well-being in the context of a divorce or parentage case where domestic violence has been alleged has become highly politicized and highly gendered. There are claims by fathers’ rights groups that mothers often falsely accuse fathers of domestic violence to alienate the fathers from their children and to improve their financial position. They also claim that children do better when fathers are equally involved in their children’s lives, but that judges favor mothers over fathers in custody cases. As a consequence, fathers’ rights groups have engaged in a nationwide …
