Gun Control Through Tort Law,
2017
University of Kentucky College of Law
Gun Control Through Tort Law, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
I have been asked to respond to an article by Professor Andrew Jay McClurg that recently appeared in the Florida Law Review. In this article, the author, a longtime advocate of firearms regulation, argues that owners and commercial sellers of firearms who negligently fail to secure them against theft should be held liable when persons are killed or injured by firearms used in the commission of a crime.
In the past, believing that existing federal and state laws were inadequate to halt the spread of gun-related deaths and injuries, proponents of stricter gun control measures proposed a number of tort …
The Right To Bear Arms... And Lesson Plans,
2017
Florida A&M University College of Law
The Right To Bear Arms... And Lesson Plans, Ryan Saboff
Florida A & M University Law Review
This Article will argue that due to the unique characteristics of mass school shootings, including their swiftness, unpredictability, and at times advanced planning and preparation, that American society can no longer simply rely on law enforcement to effectively stop or even prevent future acts of mass violence from occurring on our schools. Rather, legally licensed and armed teachers and school personnel are actually the most effective deterrent to mass school shootings. The primary focus of this Article will be schools kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12), as they comprise of the majority of mass shootings in the United States and typically …
Gun Rights And The New Lochnerism,
2017
FAMU College of Law
Gun Rights And The New Lochnerism, Areto A. Imoukuede
Journal Publications
This Article examines the Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment cases as applications of the same libertarian bias that has undermined constitutional law's fundamental rights doctrine. The concept of a libertarian bias that is based in a New Lochnerism was previously introduced in both The Fifth Freedom and The New Due Process. The analysis here demonstrates that the recently revised doctrine regarding the Second Amendment and gun rights is driven by the current Supreme Court ("Court") hostility towards government regulation in a manner that is akin to what was seen during the Lochner Era. Regrettably, this Article is timely and is …
Introducing Sts Scholarship To The Gun Policy Debate In United States Society,
2017
Scripps College
Introducing Sts Scholarship To The Gun Policy Debate In United States Society, Caroline Skinner
Scripps Senior Theses
The following thesis will merge the field of legal studies with the field
of Science, Technology, and Society, and will focus on issues surrounding the
gun control debate. The goal is to ultimately bring new light to this hot-
button legal topic through the use of STS scholarship. STS tools and theories,
which have previously been absent from most gun control discussions, have
much to contribute to the discourse in terms of motivating the need for gun
control, fully understanding the user-gun relationship, breaking down
misconceptions about the technology and its role in society, and further
understanding the complex societal …
Fear And Firearms,
2017
Duke Law School
Preface: The Second Generation Of Second Amendment Law & Policy,
2017
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Preface: The Second Generation Of Second Amendment Law & Policy, Eric M. Ruben, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Firearms In The Family,
2017
University of Colorado Law School
Firearms In The Family, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
This Article considers firearms prohibitions for domestic violence offenders, in light of recent Supreme Court decisions and the larger, national debate about gun control. Unlike other scholarship in the area, it confronts the costs of ratcheting up the scope and enforcement of such firearms bans and argues that the politicization of safety has come at the expense of a sound approach to gun control in the context of intimate-partner abuse. In doing so, it expands scholarly arguments against mandatory, one-size-fits-all criminal justice responses to domestic violence in a direction that other critics have been reluctant to go, perhaps because of …
Justifying Perceptions In First And Second Amendment Doctrine,
2017
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Justifying Perceptions In First And Second Amendment Doctrine, Eric Ruben
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Public perceptions often motivate policymakers. But what is the role of perceptions in defending regulations challenged as violating constitutional rights? This article explores how First and Second Amendment doctrine answer that question.
First Amendment free speech doctrine deploys categorical rules and balancing tests to determine the constitutionality of speech restrictions seeking to shape various perceptions. The resulting discrepancies, the article contends, can be explained by motive-based theories of First Amendment doctrine.
In the Second Amendment context, how to handle perception-based regulations remains an open question. Some courts have held that firearm restrictions can pass muster if they preserve the public’s …
The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts With A Workable Standard For Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation,
2016
Florida State University College of Law
The Second Amendment Burden: Arming Courts With A Workable Standard For Reviewing Gun Safety Legislation, Melanie Kalmanson
Florida State University Law Review
Two controversial topics; one framework. Jurisprudence surrounding the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution lacks a workable standard under which courts are to review gun control legislation. This Note presents an intersectional argument whereby the abortion “undue burden” framework is applied to Second Amendment legislation. Through this approach of applying the abortion framework to gun control legislation, like those recently proposed or discussed, this Note argues that these provisions would likely be constitutional. Though abortion is at the center of this discussion, this Note does not aim to contribute to discourse concerning reproductive rights and accepts prima facie the current-standing …
Newsroom: Time: Bogus On Second Amendment 09/28/2016,
2016
TIME Magazine
Newsroom: Time: Bogus On Second Amendment 09/28/2016, Arica L. Coleman, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Guns And Alienage: Correcting A Dangerous Contradiction,
2016
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Guns And Alienage: Correcting A Dangerous Contradiction, D. Mcnair Nichols Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trending @ Rwu Law: Dean Yelnosky's Post: What The Tragedy In Orlando Means For Rwu Law 6/17/2016,
2016
Roger Williams University School of Law
Trending @ Rwu Law: Dean Yelnosky's Post: What The Tragedy In Orlando Means For Rwu Law 6/17/2016, Michael Yelnosky
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
The Faces Of The Second Amendment Outside The Home, Take Two: How We Got Here And Why It Matters,
2016
Cleveland State University
The Faces Of The Second Amendment Outside The Home, Take Two: How We Got Here And Why It Matters, Patrick J. Charles
Cleveland State Law Review
Since the late twentieth century, the Second Amendment has been increasingly promoted as the unfettered right to carry firearms in the public concourse. This expansive meaning, however, lacks historical support. Historical evidence reveals a disparity between the Anglo-American origins of armed carriage laws and present-day interpretations of the Second Amendment. The historical backdrop also reveals the impact pro-gun organizations have had on the expansion of armed carriage. Differences in state armed carriage laws, analyzed from both historical and regional perspectives, will one day require the Supreme Court to determine which version of history should dictate the meaning of the Second …
We Don't Come From A Land Down Under: How Adopting Australia's Gun Laws Would Violate The Second Amendment Of The U.S. Constitution,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
We Don't Come From A Land Down Under: How Adopting Australia's Gun Laws Would Violate The Second Amendment Of The U.S. Constitution, Jonathan Weg
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note examines the legal and policy implications of adopting Australia's strict gun laws in the United States, arguing that such measures would likely violate the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms. While Australia's National Firearms Agreement (NFA) has successfully reduced gun violence, the U.S. constitutional framework, particularly the Second Amendment, poses significant legal barriers to replicating similar laws. The analysis highlights the cultural and legal differences between the two countries, emphasizing that compulsory gun buybacks and restrictions on firearms for self-defense would face constitutional challenges in the U.S.
Up In Arms: The Hunt To Define The Second Amendment's Scope,
2016
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Up In Arms: The Hunt To Define The Second Amendment's Scope, Holly E. Jones
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
The Real Danger Of Guns In Schools,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
The Real Danger Of Guns In Schools, Sonja R. West
Popular Media
This article that first appeared at Slate.com on March 22, 2016, looks at Georgia's "Campus Carry" Legislation. This legislation permits "any [firearm] license holder when he or she is in or on any building or real property owned by or leased to any public technical school, vocational school, college, university, or other institution of postsecondary education."
History, Heller, And High-Capacity Magazines: What Is The Proper Standard Of Review For Second Amendment Challenges?,
2016
Fordham University School of Law
History, Heller, And High-Capacity Magazines: What Is The Proper Standard Of Review For Second Amendment Challenges?, Lindsay Colvin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Second Amendment Standards Of Review In A Heller World,
2016
George Mason University School of Law
Second Amendment Standards Of Review In A Heller World, Nelson Lund
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Great Gun Control War Of The Twentieth Century—And Its Lessons For Gun Laws Today,
2016
Denver University, Sturm College of Law
The Great Gun Control War Of The Twentieth Century—And Its Lessons For Gun Laws Today, David B. Kopel
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Gun Control After Heller And Mcdonald: What Cannot Be Done And What Ought To Be Done,
2016
Florida State University
Gun Control After Heller And Mcdonald: What Cannot Be Done And What Ought To Be Done, Gary Kleck
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
