Guns On Campus: A Look At The First Year Of Concealed Carry At Texas Universities,
2017
Texas A&M University School of Law
Guns On Campus: A Look At The First Year Of Concealed Carry At Texas Universities, Aric K. Short
Faculty Scholarship
After years of failed attempts, the Texas Legislature passed "campus carry" in 2015. Under the new law, effective in 2016 for four-year institutions, public universities must allow the concealed carry of handguns by license holders on their premises. Texas's campus carry law is unique when compared to other states that allow concealed carry on college campuses: each university is given the flexibility to create weapons implementation plans, including the establishment of limited gun-free zones. The first year of campus carry implementation by Texas universities has been relatively quiet, with generally uniform implementation rules established by colleges across the state. However, …
Arming The Second Amendment—And Enforcing The Fourteenth,
2017
Brooklyn Law School
Arming The Second Amendment—And Enforcing The Fourteenth, William D. Araiza
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Article considers the timely and important question of Congress’s power to enforce the Second Amendment. Such legislation would test the Court’s current enforcement power doctrine, which ostensibly acknowledges a congressional role in vindicating constitutional rights while insisting on judicial supremacy in stating constitutional meaning. Second Amendment doctrine is complex and, importantly, methodologically varied. That complexity and variety would require the Court to perform a more nuanced, granular approach to the enforcement power than it has thus far in the modern era.
Part II quickly recaps the Court’s Enforcement Clause jurisprudence. It concludes that its most recent enforcement power cases …
Militias, Muskets, And Machine Guns? The Third Circuit Furthers Inapplicability Of Second Amendment Protection To Machine Gun Possession In United States V. One Palmetto State Armory,
2017
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Militias, Muskets, And Machine Guns? The Third Circuit Furthers Inapplicability Of Second Amendment Protection To Machine Gun Possession In United States V. One Palmetto State Armory, Peter J. Adonizio Jr.
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Federalism Implications Of Non-Recognition Of Licensure Reciprocity Under The Gun-Free School Zones Act,
2017
University of Missouri School of Law
Federalism Implications Of Non-Recognition Of Licensure Reciprocity Under The Gun-Free School Zones Act, Royce De R. Barondes
Faculty Publications
The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) criminalizes firearms possession within 1000 feet of an elementary or secondary school in a State unless the possessor "is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located" (or one of a few other exceptions applies). The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has in correspondence opined licensure through reciprocity does not make one so licensed by the State.
School zones covered by the act are ubiquitous. Were the ATF's interpretation adopted, large swaths of many States' non-rural areas would be prohibited zones for non-residents who carry …
The Second Amendment & Private Law,
2017
Boston University School of Law
The Second Amendment & Private Law, Cody Jacobs
Faculty Scholarship
The Second Amendment, like other federal constitutional rights, is a restriction on government power. But what role does the Second Amendment have to play—if any—when a private party seeks to limit the exercise of Second Amendment rights by invoking private law causes of action? Private law—specifically, the law of torts, contracts, and property—has often been impacted by constitutional considerations, though in seemingly inconsistent ways. The First Amendment places limitations on defamation actions and other related torts, and also prevents courts from entering injunctions that could be classified as prior restraints. On the other hand, the First Amendment plays almost no …
“Time Enough” For Scrutiny: The Second Amendment, Mental Health, And The Case For Intermediate Scrutiny,
2017
William & Mary Law School
“Time Enough” For Scrutiny: The Second Amendment, Mental Health, And The Case For Intermediate Scrutiny, Benjamin A. Ellis
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Fitting A Gun In A Circle–A How-To Guide: A Comprehensive Look At The Standard Of Review For Gun Regulations Under The Second Amendment,
2017
University of Miami Law School
Fitting A Gun In A Circle–A How-To Guide: A Comprehensive Look At The Standard Of Review For Gun Regulations Under The Second Amendment, Beth Coplowitz
University of Miami Law Review
In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment case, the Court held that the right to bear arms is an individual right aimed at self-defense in the home. Two years later, McDonald v. City of Chicago extended this right to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. However, lower courts were left with little guidance on what level of scrutiny to apply to gun regulations. As a result, courts have applied various levels of scrutiny including intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny, a two-step inquiry that leads to either intermediate or strict scrutiny, and an undue burden standard. Of …
The “True Man” And His Gun: On The Masculine Mystique Of Second Amendment Jurisprudence,
2017
William & Mary Law School
The “True Man” And His Gun: On The Masculine Mystique Of Second Amendment Jurisprudence, C. D. Christensen
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
The Supreme Court’s recent Second Amendment jurisprudence raises serious normative questions for the use of self-defense with a firearm. This jurisprudence also implicates our prevailing social norms with respect to socially constructed and structurally pervasive gender roles. I argue that a peculiarly American conception of masculinity underpins the judicial construction of the Second Amendment’s core purpose as guaranteeing the right to armed defense of one’s self and one’s home. The Court’s recent Second Amendment rulings create an individual protection for gun ownership and incorporate the same against the States. But the Court’s reasoning entangles this protection with an implicit valuation …
Classrooms & Curriculum,
2017
Collin College
Classrooms & Curriculum, Devin Walz, Anh Doan, Cathy Tran, Loraina Galarza
Collin College Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Student Research Conference
Panel Chair: Lisa Roy-Davis
Papers Presented:
"Should the State of Texas Allow Public Universities and Colleges to Permit Guns on Campuses?" By Devin Walz
"Pets in the Elementary Classroom" by Anh Doan
"Technology Case Study of K-12 Students" by Cathy Tran
Abstract: Technology is an exponentially revolutionizing tool that has pushed all aspects of society to adapt and grow in the time known as the “Information Age”. The way that humans process information, and the speed at which humans can process information, with technology allows humans to grow more efficiently and effectively. Technology is continually designed to become more optimal …
To Have And To Hold: Factors To Consider Before Divorcing South Carolina From The Concealed Weapons Permit Requirement,
2017
University of South Carolina
To Have And To Hold: Factors To Consider Before Divorcing South Carolina From The Concealed Weapons Permit Requirement, Joseph D. Spate
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tort Law Inside Out,
2017
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Tort Law Inside Out, Cristina Carmody Tilley
Faculty Publications
For more than a century, scholars have been looking at tort law from the outside in. Theorists committed to external goals like efficient allocation of resources or moral justice have treated tort as a mere vehicle for the achievement of their policy preferences, rather than as a body of law with a discernible internal purpose. It is time to revisit tort on its own terms.
This Article takes its cue from the New Doctrinalists, who urge that extralegal normative insights from fields such as economics or philosophy aid adjudication only when they are directly tethered to legal concepts; that is, …
Kolbe V. Hogan: Hewing To Heller And Taking Aim At A Standard Of Strict Scrutiny For Comprehensive Firearms Legislation,
2017
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Kolbe V. Hogan: Hewing To Heller And Taking Aim At A Standard Of Strict Scrutiny For Comprehensive Firearms Legislation, Brett S. Turlington
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Creating Precedents Through Words And Deeds,
2017
Illinois Institute of Technology
Creating Precedents Through Words And Deeds, Harold Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
Book review: Untrodden ground: how presidents interpret the Constitution. By Harold H. Bruff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 557 pages. Reviewed by Harold J. Krent
The Second Amendment And “The People”: Who Has The Right To Bear Arms?, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (2017),
2017
UIC School of Law
The Second Amendment And “The People”: Who Has The Right To Bear Arms?, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 199 (2017), Kasim Carbide
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preface: The Second Generation Of Second Amendment Law & Policy,
2017
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Preface: The Second Generation Of Second Amendment Law & Policy, Eric M. Ruben, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
Disarming State Action; Discharging State Responsibility,
2017
University of Miami School of Law
Disarming State Action; Discharging State Responsibility, Zanita E. Fenton
Articles
No abstract provided.
Justifying Perceptions In First And Second Amendment Doctrine,
2017
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Justifying Perceptions In First And Second Amendment Doctrine, Eric Ruben
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Public perceptions often motivate policymakers. But what is the role of perceptions in defending regulations challenged as violating constitutional rights? This article explores how First and Second Amendment doctrine answer that question.
First Amendment free speech doctrine deploys categorical rules and balancing tests to determine the constitutionality of speech restrictions seeking to shape various perceptions. The resulting discrepancies, the article contends, can be explained by motive-based theories of First Amendment doctrine.
In the Second Amendment context, how to handle perception-based regulations remains an open question. Some courts have held that firearm restrictions can pass muster if they preserve the public’s …
Gun Control Through Tort Law,
2017
University of Kentucky College of Law
Gun Control Through Tort Law, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
I have been asked to respond to an article by Professor Andrew Jay McClurg that recently appeared in the Florida Law Review. In this article, the author, a longtime advocate of firearms regulation, argues that owners and commercial sellers of firearms who negligently fail to secure them against theft should be held liable when persons are killed or injured by firearms used in the commission of a crime.
In the past, believing that existing federal and state laws were inadequate to halt the spread of gun-related deaths and injuries, proponents of stricter gun control measures proposed a number of tort …
The Right To Bear Arms... And Lesson Plans,
2017
Florida A&M University College of Law
The Right To Bear Arms... And Lesson Plans, Ryan Saboff
Florida A & M University Law Review
This Article will argue that due to the unique characteristics of mass school shootings, including their swiftness, unpredictability, and at times advanced planning and preparation, that American society can no longer simply rely on law enforcement to effectively stop or even prevent future acts of mass violence from occurring on our schools. Rather, legally licensed and armed teachers and school personnel are actually the most effective deterrent to mass school shootings. The primary focus of this Article will be schools kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12), as they comprise of the majority of mass shootings in the United States and typically …
Gun Rights And The New Lochnerism,
2017
FAMU College of Law
Gun Rights And The New Lochnerism, Areto A. Imoukuede
Journal Publications
This Article examines the Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment cases as applications of the same libertarian bias that has undermined constitutional law's fundamental rights doctrine. The concept of a libertarian bias that is based in a New Lochnerism was previously introduced in both The Fifth Freedom and The New Due Process. The analysis here demonstrates that the recently revised doctrine regarding the Second Amendment and gun rights is driven by the current Supreme Court ("Court") hostility towards government regulation in a manner that is akin to what was seen during the Lochner Era. Regrettably, this Article is timely and is …
