Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities,
2013
Pepperdine University
Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities, Susan J. Stabile
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking An Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response To Abdullahi A. An-Na'im’S Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective,
2013
Pepperdine University
Seeking An Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response To Abdullahi A. An-Na'im’S Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Mohammad H. Fadel
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor 'Abdallahi Na'im argues that there can be no conflict between religion and the state because religion and politics are part of different normative orders, and thus it is not conceivable that a conflict can arise between them. I argue that Na'im's solution to the problematic relationship of religion to state shares the same conceptual terrain as separationism in American constitutional law, a position which has grown increasingly untenable as a result of the increasing religious pluralism in the United States and the expansion of the government into areas of life in a manner that would have been inconceivable even …
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective,
2013
Pepperdine University
Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Abdullahi A. An-Na'im
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen, Eugene Volokh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman,
2013
Pepperdine University
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Pepperdine Law Review
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law,” delivered by Prof. Andrew Koppelman at a conference, “The Competing Claims of Law and Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?”, which was held at Pepperdine University in February of 2012. In this response, it is suggested – among other things – that “American religious neutrality” is, as Koppelman argues, “coherent and attractive” because and to the extent that it is not neutral with respect to the goal and good of religious freedom. Religious freedom, in the American tradition, is not …
The Priority Of God: A Theory Of Religious Liberty,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Priority Of God: A Theory Of Religious Liberty, Michael Stokes Paulsen
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor Paulsen argues that religious freedom only makes entire sense as a constitutional arrangement on the premise that God exists, that God makes actual demands on human loyalty and conduct, and that those demands precede and are superior in obligation to those of the State. Religious freedom exists to protect the exercise of plausibly true understandings of God's actual commands, as against state power, and to disable state power to proscribe -- or prescribe -- religious exercise. The article explores four possible stances of society toward religious freedom, depending on whether society and state embrace the idea of religious truth …
Can We Please Stop Talking About Neutrality? Koppelman Between Scalia And Rawls,
2013
Pepperdine University
Can We Please Stop Talking About Neutrality? Koppelman Between Scalia And Rawls, Chad Flanders
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mighty Work Of Making Nations Happy: A Response To James Davison Hunter,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Mighty Work Of Making Nations Happy: A Response To James Davison Hunter, Patrick Mckinley Brennan
Pepperdine Law Review
This article is an invited response to James Davison Hunter’s much-discussed book To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World (Oxford University Press, 2010). Hunter, a sociologist at UVA and a believing Protestant, claims that law’s capacity to contribute to social change is “mostly illusory” and that Christians, therefore, should practice “faithful presence” in the public square rather than seek to influence law directly. My response is that it is, in fact, law’s stunning ability to alter and limit available choices that makes it an object of deservedly fierce contest. The wild …
And I Don’T Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality In American Law,
2013
Pepperdine University
And I Don’T Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality In American Law, Andrew Koppelman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Faithful Presence And Theological Jurisprudence: A Response To James Davison Hunter ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Faithful Presence And Theological Jurisprudence: A Response To James Davison Hunter , Zachary R. Calo
Pepperdine Law Review
This paper considers how James Hunter’s arguments, presented both in his address and his book To Change the World, might inform the development of a constructive religious legal theory based in the particular resources of Christian theology. In speaking of religious legal theory, I mean something quite different than a theory of law and religion. For some time, the academic conversation about law and religion has centered around issues concerning church-state relations and, more broadly, the place of religion within the liberal political order. Yet, the regnant methodological concerns that have shaped this discourse reflect the boundedness of law to …
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom? ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Symposium Introduction: The Competing Claims Of Law And Religion: Who Should Influence Whom? , Robert F. Cochran Jr., Michael A. Helfand
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law, Religion, And The Common Good,
2013
Pepperdine University
Law, Religion, And The Common Good, James Davison Hunter
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Just Another Brick In The Wall: The Establishment Clause As A Heckler's Veto,
2013
University of Nebraska College of Law
Just Another Brick In The Wall: The Establishment Clause As A Heckler's Veto, Richard F. Duncan
Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications
"When rights are incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment they should advance, not constrain, individual liberty."'
Although the First Amendment explicitly protects individuals against only laws made by "Congress," the Supreme Court has long held that, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the states are forbidden from "depriving" persons of the fundamental individual liberties protected by the First Amendment.' Thus, under the so-called doctrine of incorporation, a particular provision of the First Amendment (as well as of the rest of the Bill of Rights) "is made applicable to the states [only] if the Justices are …
The Politics Of Religious Establishment: Recognition Of Muslim Marriages In South Africa,
2013
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Politics Of Religious Establishment: Recognition Of Muslim Marriages In South Africa, Peter G. Danchin
Faculty Scholarship
This paper explores the normative dissonances and antinomies generated by the politics around religious establishment by examining post-apartheid law reform efforts in South Africa to recognize Muslim marriages. Since the late 1990s, the South African Law Reform Commission has initiated various projects to recognize the claims of and redress past discrimination against different religious communities, including tribal groups living under customary law and religious minorities with their own family and personal status laws. It is striking how the norms and assumptions underpinning this debate differ from engagements involving the claims of religious communities in Europe and North America where broadly …
Brief For Prof. Leslie C. Griffin As Amica Curiae In Support Of Appellant, Kant V. Lexington Theological Seminary,
2013
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Brief For Prof. Leslie C. Griffin As Amica Curiae In Support Of Appellant, Kant V. Lexington Theological Seminary, Leslie C. Griffin
Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Religious Freedom In The United States: ‘When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It',
2013
University of Dayton
Religious Freedom In The United States: ‘When You Come To A Fork In The Road, Take It', Charles J. Russo
Educational Leadership Faculty Publications
As expansive as the Supreme Court’s view of the First Amendment religion clauses has been, its jurisprudence has demonstrated that its rulings do not always achieve the outcomes desired by proponents of religious freedom.3 From the perspective of supporters of religious freedom, this realization lends credence to the preceding wry comment by Justice Scalia. This article details the Court’s inconsistent treatment of Christianity, and people of faith broadly, especially in educational settings. These inconsistent judicial outcomes run the risk of increasingly marginalizing matters of faith and conscience in the public square.4 As discussed in this article, disputes over …
Springtime For Freedom Of Religion Or Belief: Will Newly Democratic Arab States Guarantee International Human Rights Norms Or Perpetuate Their Violation?,
2013
University of Tennessee College of Law
Springtime For Freedom Of Religion Or Belief: Will Newly Democratic Arab States Guarantee International Human Rights Norms Or Perpetuate Their Violation?, Robert C. Blitt
Book Chapters
The Arab Spring has generated unprecedented and seismic political and social upheaval across the Arab world. The reasons for the outbreak of widespread and vociferous public protest are myriad, but generally understood as including long-simmering resentment of government corruption and repression, underwhelming economic development, chronic unemployment and poor respect for human rights, including the treatment of individuals and groups affiliated with political manifestations of Islam. Despite the initial drama surrounding the street rallies, two years on, the pace of change has grown fitful and uncertain.
The purpose of this chapter is to consider one narrow aspect of the Arab Spring. …
Chapter 834: Clearing A Roadblock In The Battle Over
Same-Sex Marriage,
2013
Pacific McGeorge School of Law
Chapter 834: Clearing A Roadblock In The Battle Over Same-Sex Marriage, Sean D. O’Dowd
McGeorge Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chapter 287: Religious Accommodation For Employees,
2013
Pacific McGeorge School of Law
Chapter 287: Religious Accommodation For Employees, David Vidal
McGeorge Law Review
No abstract provided.
