Piercing The Religious Veil Of The So-Called Cults ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Piercing The Religious Veil Of The So-Called Cults , Joey Peter Moore
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Government Entanglement With Religion: What Degree Of Proof Is Required? ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Government Entanglement With Religion: What Degree Of Proof Is Required? , Lee Boothby
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Religion" And "Religious Institutions" Under The First Amendment ,
2013
Pepperdine University
"Religion" And "Religious Institutions" Under The First Amendment , Sharon L. Worthing
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Government's Role In The "Purification" Of Religious Organizations,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Government's Role In The "Purification" Of Religious Organizations, Robert L. Toms, Lisa A. Runquist
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Heffron V. International Society For Krishna Consciousness Inc.: A Restrictive Constitutional View Of The Proselytizing Rights Of Religious Organizations ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Heffron V. International Society For Krishna Consciousness Inc.: A Restrictive Constitutional View Of The Proselytizing Rights Of Religious Organizations , Michael M. Greenburg
Pepperdine Law Review
The persistent efforts of religious organizations to reach their public have consistently been met with governmental limitation due to the often conflicting interests of public order, and free speech and expression. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. represents the Court's latest redefinition of the extent of permissible limitations upon the activities of these groups. The author examines the decision in light of the traditional criteria for permissible time, place, and manner restrictions upon free speech and evaluates the Court's implementation of these restrictions with respect to the activities of the Krishna group. The impact of the decision upon …
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division,
2013
Pepperdine University
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division, Lynn Mccutchen Gardner
Pepperdine Law Review
In Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, the United States Supreme Court was called upon to clarify the appropriate level of review to be applied in cases which examine the first amendment right to free exercise of religion. The Court ruled that the "compelling state interest" test is the proper standard to be used. The Court also accorded first amendment protection to beliefs which are not shared by other members of a religious group and which are instead the unique interpretation of an individual member and not acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others.
Preserving Religious Freedom,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
Preserving Religious Freedom, Dallin H. Oaks
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This address was given at Chapman University School of Law in Orange, California, on February 4, 2011.
The Constitutional Issues Surrounding The Science-Religion Conflict In Public Schools: The Anti-Evolution Controversy,
2013
Pepperdine University
The Constitutional Issues Surrounding The Science-Religion Conflict In Public Schools: The Anti-Evolution Controversy, Michael M. Greenburg
Pepperdine Law Review
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the "anti-evolution" laws has plagued both legal scholars and school administrators. The courts have generally invalidated legislation which bans outright the teaching of evolution in public schools, but with the advent of the "balanced treatment" acts, a revival of this litigation has begun. The author examines the constitutional analysis utilized by the courts in dealing with the "anti-evolution" and "balanced treatment" acts and provides an historical perspective of the first amendment to question the Court's response to the issue.
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation,
2013
Pepperdine University
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Pepperdine Law Review
Justice Hugo L. Black served on the United States Supreme Court over a period of thirty-four years, encompassing Supreme Court terms from 1937 to 1971. During this period, the subject of the constitutional limitations of the freedom of religion was increasingly subjected to intense social pressures. Justice Black figured prominently in the development of constitutional law as the Supreme Court attempted to give meaning to the establishment and free exercise clause of the first amendment. He wrote the majority opinions which dealt with the establishment clause in the Everson, McCulloin, Engel and Torcaso cases. Yet, on later occasions, Justice Black …
Marsh V. Chambers: The Supreme Court Takes A New Look At The Establishment Clause,
2013
Pepperdine University
Marsh V. Chambers: The Supreme Court Takes A New Look At The Establishment Clause, Diane L. Walker
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Observations On The Establishment Clause,
2013
Pepperdine University
Some Observations On The Establishment Clause, William French Smith
Pepperdine Law Review
As evidenced by current interpretations of the establishment clause, lower federal court decisions indicate an increased tendency of hostility toward religion. In this article, Attorney General William French Smith surveys the history of the establishment clause and Supreme Court decisions regarding religious issues. Attorney General Smith then notes the recent success of the Reagan Administration's efforts, through amicus curiae briefs, to advocate an interpretation of the establishment clause which permits the states to take an attitude of benevolent neutrality toward religion. The article then concludes that such a position is both historically and judicially sound.
Bad Moon Rising: The Sharia Law Bans,
2013
Louisiana State University Law Center
Bad Moon Rising: The Sharia Law Bans, Bradford J. Kelley
Louisiana Law Review
The article presents information on the Sharia Law, an Islamic religious law, and other foreign laws in the U.S. courts. It discusses that whether prohibition should be applied to the Sharia Law. It mentions about the impact of this Law in the countries like the U.S. and Great Britain. It informs about the efforts made by the U.S. state legislative to stop use of Sharia Law.
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts,
2013
Cornell Law School
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
We analyze various factors that influence judicial decisions in cases involving Free Exercise Clause or religious accommodation claims and decided by lower federal courts. Religious liberty claims, including those moored in the Free Exercise Clause, typically generate particularly difficult questions about how best to structure the sometimes contentious relation between the religious faithful and the sovereign government. Such difficult questions arise frequently in and are often framed by litigation. Our analyses include all digested Free Exercise and religious accommodation claim decisions by federal court of appeals and district court judges from 1996 through 2005. As it relates to one key …
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas , Richard H. Seeburger
Pepperdine Law Review
In free exercise cases, the Supreme Court has adopted a least restrictive alternative test in an attempt to maximize protection for religiously motivated practices. Because the least restrictive alternative test only considers the importance of the governmental interest and the availability of alternative means to accomplish those interests, thereby ignoring the importance of the burdened religious activity to the individual and the degree of burden on religious activity, all religious interests are treated equally when asserted against a governmental interest. Under such an inflexible and brittle test, the Supreme Court has recently denied religious claims which had previously been recognized. …
Clergy Malpractice: Making Clergy Accountable To A Lower Power,
2013
Pepperdine University
Clergy Malpractice: Making Clergy Accountable To A Lower Power, Lawrence M. Burek
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?,
2013
Pepperdine University
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools , John W. Whitehead
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theism, Naturalism, And Liberalism: John Stuart Mill And The “Final Inexplicability” Of The Self,
2013
Pepperdine University
Theism, Naturalism, And Liberalism: John Stuart Mill And The “Final Inexplicability” Of The Self, John Lawrence Hill
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Teach And Persuade,
2013
Pepperdine University
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels,
2013
Pepperdine University
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels, Barak D. Richman
Pepperdine Law Review
America’s rabbis currently structure their employment market with rules that flagrantly violate the Sherman Act. The consequences of these rules, in addition to the predictable economic outcomes of inflated wages for rabbis and restricted consumer freedoms for the congregations that employ them, meaningfully hinder Jewish communities from seeking their preferred spiritual leader. Although the First Amendment cannot combat against this privately-orchestrated (yet paradigmatic) restriction on religious expression, the Sherman Act can. Ironically, however, the rabbinic organizations implementing the restrictive policies claim that the First Amendment immunizes them from Sherman Act scrutiny, thereby claiming the First Amendment empowers them to do …
