Litigation Commons^™

Drawing Lines: Reconciling Disparate Standards Of Ada Title Iii Protections In An Online World, Benjamin Holman

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—First Circuit Clearly Unconvinced By Lack Of Procedural Safeguards In Proving Noncitizens’ Flight Risk—Hernandez-Lara V. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19 (1st Cir. 2021), Shannah Colbert

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Debt Collection—A Benign Language Exception Should Be Read Into The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act’S “Unfair Practices” Section—Donovan V. Firstcredit, Inc., 983 F.3d 246 (6th Cir. 2020), Shiri Pagliuso

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Constitutionality Of Police Caretaking Conduct Inside The Home—Calinga V. Strom, 141 S. Ct. 1596 (2021), Angela Bartucca

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Front Matter, Jtaa Editors

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Editor's Note, Allison Eddy

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

The Judicial War On Drugs: Deciding Whether To Apply The Federal Or State Definition Of Controlled Substance Offenses For Career Offender Sentencing Enhancements, Marisa Chamberland

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—An Alternative Analysis To Intangible Emotional Harm Standing In The Way Of Constitutional Standing—Vazzano V. Receivable Mgmt. Servs., Llc, No. 3:21-Cv-0825-D, 2022 U.S. Dist. Lexis 144258 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 12 2022), Emily Larovere

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

A Machete For The Patent Thicket: Using Noerr-Pennington Doctrine’S Sham Exception To Challenge Abusive Patent Tactics By Pharmaceutical Companies, Lisa Orucevic

Vanderbilt Law Review

Outrageous drug prices have dominated news coverage of the American healthcare system for years. Yet despite widespread condemnation of skyrocketing drug prices, nothing seems to change. Pharmaceutical companies can raise drug prices with impunity because they hold patents on their drugs, which give them monopolies. These monopolies are only supposed to last twenty years, and then competing lower-cost drugs like generics can enter the market, driving down the costs of pharmaceuticals for all. But pharmaceutical companies have created “patent thickets,” dense webs of overlapping patents surrounding one drug, which have artificially extended the companies’ monopolies for years or even decades …

Reflections On Nomos: Paideic Communities And Same Sex Weddings, Marie A. Failinger

Touro Law Review

Robert Cover’s Nomos and Narrative is an instructive tale for the constitutional battle over whether religious wedding vendors must be required to serve same-sex couples. He helps us see how contending communities’ deep narratives of martyrdom and obedience to the values of their paideic communities can be silenced by the imperial community’s insistence on choosing one community’s story over another community’s in adjudication. The wedding vendor cases call for an alternative to jurispathic violence, for a constitutionally redemptive response that prizes a nomos of inclusion and respect for difference.

Balancing Clashing Scholars’ Academic Freedoms, Sharona Aharoni-Goldenberg, Gerry Leisman

Touro Law Review

The paper analyzes the scope of scholars’ academic freedom and maintains that it is composed of two pillars. First, inclusion, which is subject to capacity, equality, and the provision of a pro-educational academic environment. Second, academic expression, which refers to teaching and research, freedom of opinion, political participation outside academia and freedom to receive academic materials. Scholars’ academic freedom is limited by professional standards and is subject to the respect of the rights of fellow scholars.

The paper argues that scholars’ academic freedom is not confined to a scholar-state relation but is also relevant to scholar-scholar relations. Hence, scholars’ academic …

Arbitration Case Law Updates 2021–2022 (June 2022), Sandra D. Grannum, Elissa Germaine

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This article summarizes leading arbitration cases and related issues that are of particular relevance to the securities arbitration practitioner. There appears to be a move away from compelling arbitration and federal jurisdiction of motions to confirm or vacate. The courts have decided several cases specifically involving FINRA arbitrations, discussing who can bring them and what courts have jurisdiction over them.

In addition, the Federal Arbitration Act was amended by the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, the title of which speaks for itself.

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Political Ideology And Judicial Administration: Evidence From The Covid-19 Pandemic, Kyle Rozema, Adam Chilton, Christopher Anthony Cotropia, David L. Schwartz

Scholarship@WashULaw

We study the effect of political ideology on the administration of the judiciary by investigating how the chief judges of federal district courts set courthouse policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To do so, we use novel data on the geographic boundaries of federal courts and on the contents of pandemic orders. We account for state and local conditions and policies by leveraging district courts in states that have multiple judicial districts and that have courthouses in multiple counties, and we isolate the effect of chief ideology by using simulations that difference out unobserved district-level effects. We find no …

The Stoic Litigator, Leonard M. Niehoff

Articles

A variety of events over the past several years have renewed my conversations with some reliable old friends. And I mean very old. I refer here to the Stoic philosophers, most of whom did their thinking and writing around the turn of the Common Era.

The Stoics took their name from the central square of Athens, the Stoa Poikile, where Zeno is generally credited with founding the school in the early part of the third century BCE. Various philosophers over the next five centuries identified themselves as Stoics, so the label takes in lots of personalities and lots of territory. …

Table Of Contents

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Hernández V. Mesa: A Case For A More Meaningful Partnership With The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights, Peyton Jacobsen

Seattle University Law Review

Through an in-depth examination of Hernández, the Inter-American Human Rights System, and the success of Mexico’s partnership with said system, this Note will make a case for embracing human rights bodies— specifically, the Inter-American System on Human Rights—as an appropriate and necessary check on the structures that form the United States government. Part I will look closely at the reasoning and judicially created doctrine that guided the decision in Hernández, with the goal of providing a better understanding of the complicated path through the courts that led to a seemingly straightforward yet unsatisfying result. Part II will illustrate the scope …

2022 Data Updates Accompanying Andrea Fenster & Margo Schlanger, Slamming The Courthouse Door: 25 Years Of Evidence For Repealing The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Prison Policy Initiative, Margo Schlanger, German Marquez Alcala

Other Publications

This entry is for underlying data, excel versions, and replication code for tables included in Fenster, Andrea and Margo Schlanger. "Slamming the Courthouse Door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act." Prison Policy Initiative (2021) found at https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/173/

This 2022 data update is supplemented by 2022 BJS Court Orders files and supercedes the 2021 data update found in this repository./

2022 Data Update For Slamming The Courthouse Door Table F: Incidence Of Court Orders, Margo Schlanger, German Marquez Alcala

Other Publications

This dataset encompasses Table F: Incidence of Court Orders, Local Jails and State Prisons, 1983-2006, 2019 and the underlying data, excel versions, and replication code for this table.

This data accompanies:

Fenster, Andrea and Margo Schlanger. "Slamming the Courthouse Door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act." Prison Policy Initiative (2021). https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/173/

Along with the 2022 Data Update Files, this file supersedes the 2021 Data update found in this repository.

To Participate And Elect: Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act At 40, Ellen D. Katz, Brian Remlinger, Andrew Dziedzic, Brooke Simone, Jordan Schuler

Other Publications

This paper provides an overview of cases decided under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act between September 1, 1982 and December 31, 2021. It updates our 2006 study documenting Section 2 litigation through 2005. Of note is the substantial decline in the number of Section 2 cases decided and diminished success for the plaintiffs who bring them. While recent litigation (including Brnovich and Merrill v. Milligan) suggests that Section 2 is likely to occupy, at best, a diminished role in future electoral disputes, this paper shows that Section 2’s reach had already declined significantly prior to recent disputes. …