Litigation Commons^™

Civil Rights Law Equity: An Introduction To A Theory Of What Civil Rights Has Become, John Valery White

Scholarly Works

This Article argues that civil rights law is better understood as civil rights equity. It contends that the four-decade-long project of restricting civil rights litigation has shaped civil rights jurisprudence into a contemporary version of traditional equity. For years commentators have noted the low success rates of civil rights suits and debated the propriety of increasingly restrictive procedural and substantive doctrines. Activists have lost faith in civil rights litigation as an effective tool for social change, instead seeking change in administrative forums, or by asserting political pressure through social media and activism to compel policy change. As for civil rights …

Table Of Contents

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Hernández V. Mesa: A Case For A More Meaningful Partnership With The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights, Peyton Jacobsen

Seattle University Law Review

Through an in-depth examination of Hernández, the Inter-American Human Rights System, and the success of Mexico’s partnership with said system, this Note will make a case for embracing human rights bodies— specifically, the Inter-American System on Human Rights—as an appropriate and necessary check on the structures that form the United States government. Part I will look closely at the reasoning and judicially created doctrine that guided the decision in Hernández, with the goal of providing a better understanding of the complicated path through the courts that led to a seemingly straightforward yet unsatisfying result. Part II will illustrate the scope …

2022 Data Updates Accompanying Andrea Fenster & Margo Schlanger, Slamming The Courthouse Door: 25 Years Of Evidence For Repealing The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Prison Policy Initiative, Margo Schlanger, German Marquez Alcala

Other Publications

This entry is for underlying data, excel versions, and replication code for tables included in Fenster, Andrea and Margo Schlanger. "Slamming the Courthouse Door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act." Prison Policy Initiative (2021) found at https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/173/

This 2022 data update is supplemented by 2022 BJS Court Orders files and supercedes the 2021 data update found in this repository./

2022 Data Update For Slamming The Courthouse Door Table F: Incidence Of Court Orders, Margo Schlanger, German Marquez Alcala

Other Publications

This dataset encompasses Table F: Incidence of Court Orders, Local Jails and State Prisons, 1983-2006, 2019 and the underlying data, excel versions, and replication code for this table.

This data accompanies:

Fenster, Andrea and Margo Schlanger. "Slamming the Courthouse Door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act." Prison Policy Initiative (2021). https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/173/

Along with the 2022 Data Update Files, this file supersedes the 2021 Data update found in this repository.

To Participate And Elect: Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act At 40, Ellen D. Katz, Brian Remlinger, Andrew Dziedzic, Brooke Simone, Jordan Schuler

Other Publications

This paper provides an overview of cases decided under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act between September 1, 1982 and December 31, 2021. It updates our 2006 study documenting Section 2 litigation through 2005. Of note is the substantial decline in the number of Section 2 cases decided and diminished success for the plaintiffs who bring them. While recent litigation (including Brnovich and Merrill v. Milligan) suggests that Section 2 is likely to occupy, at best, a diminished role in future electoral disputes, this paper shows that Section 2’s reach had already declined significantly prior to recent disputes. …

Brief Of Black Women Law Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. V. President And Fellows Of Harvard College And Univ. Of N.C., Suzette Malveaux

Scholarly Articles

Amici are Black women law scholars who, based on their professional and personal experiences, share a deeply rooted commitment to defending the legality of race-conscious admissions policies in educational institutions across the country. They submit this brief to present their unique and vital perspective on the history, constitutionality, and importance of race-conscious programs like those adopted by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (“UNC”).

Masthead, Jtaa Editors

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Sacrificing Justice For “Simplicity”: Inequitable Protection Of Medical Providers In Malpractice Cases Exacerbated By Abandoning The Substantial Factor Test, Michayla Woodward

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Strengthening Schools’ Ability To Combat Cyberbullying In Denying Students’ First Amendment Challenge—Doe V. Hopkinton Pub. Schs., 19 F.4th 493 (1st Cir. 2021), Rebecca Brownell

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Front Matter, Jtaa Editors

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Jtaa Editors

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure—Night At The Museum: The Balance Between Learning From History And Maintaining The Secrecy Surrounding Grand Jury Proceedings—Lepore V. United States (In Re Order Directing Release Of Recs.), 27 F.4th 94 (1st Cir. 2022), Jessica Vedrani

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure—The Need For Effect-Based Personal Jurisdiction In Trademark Litigation—Motus, Llc V. Cardata Consultants, Llc, 23 F.4th 115 (1st Cir. 2022), Ian Mcreynolds

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Education Law—A Child Left Behind: Exploring Failures In Effective Iep Implementation—Lamar Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. V. J.T., 577 F. Supp. 3d 599 (S.D. Tex. 2021), Katie Groves

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Protecting Post-Dobbs Abortion-Seeking Minors In A Judicial Bypass System—Doe Ex Rel. Rothert V. Chapman, 30 F.4th 766 (8th Cir. 2022), Meaghan Rose Costello

Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy

No abstract provided.

The Negative Impact Of Service Member And Veteran Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Ptsd) Rating Or Specter Of Ptsd On Child Custody Arrangements, Erhan Bedestani

Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology

No abstract provided.

The Promise And Perils Of Private Enforcement, Luke P. Norris

Law Faculty Publications

A new crop of private enforcement suits is sprouting up across the country. These laws permit people to bring enforcement actions against those who aid or induce abortions, against schools that permit transgender students to use bathrooms consistent with their gender identities, and against schools that permit transgender students to play on sports teams consistent with their gender identities. Similar laws permit people to bring enforcement actions against schools that teach critical race theory and against those who sell restricted firearms. State legislatures are considering a host of laws modeled on these examples, along with other novel regimes. These are …

The Spirit Of The Law In The Anthropocene: A Massachusetts V. Environmental Protection Agency Casenote, Victoria Depalma

Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law

No abstract provided.

Excessive Fee Litigation In Light Of Hughes V. Northwestern University, Kathryn L. Moore

Law Faculty Books and Chapters

On September 11, 2006, Jerry Schlichter, a personal injury lawyer from St. Louis, Missouri, rocked the 401(k) plan market by filing a flurry of lawsuits against major corporations alleging that their 401(k) plans were paying excessive fees for plan administration and asset management that harmed employees in violation of their fiduciary duties under ERISA. Between 2006 and 2007, 31 excessive fee suits were filed by Schlichter and other firms. Following several large settlements, including a $62 million settlement by Lockheed Martin, a second wave of excessive fee litigation began in 2015 with more than 50 suits filed in both 2016 …