The Trade Act Of 1974: Soviet-American Commercial Relations And The Future,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
The Trade Act Of 1974: Soviet-American Commercial Relations And The Future, Kenneth Klein
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
A Survey Of Possible Legal Responses To International Terrorism: Prevention, Punishment, And Cooperative Action,
2016
Yale University
A Survey Of Possible Legal Responses To International Terrorism: Prevention, Punishment, And Cooperative Action, Jordan J. Paust
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Environmental Justice And Community-Based Reparations,
2016
Seattle University School of Law
Environmental Justice And Community-Based Reparations, Catherine Millas Kaiman
Seattle University Law Review
This Article seeks to illuminate the lack of adequate legal remedies that are available for low-income, predominantly minority communities that have suffered historic environmental injustices. The Article not only discusses the lack of adequate legal remedies, but also proposes the use of local, state, and federal reparations programs for communities that have previously suffered environmental injustices; are still living with the effects of environmental injustices, by way of disease, air, soil, and water pollution; or are suffering current and ongoing environmental injustices. As has been recently illustrated by Michigan’s state action of providing lead-contaminated water for over a year to …
Foreign Nation Judgments - If State Law Provides For The Enforceability Of Foreign Judgments, The Judgment Is Enforceable Without Determination Of Whether The Arbitration Award On Which It Is Based Is Independently Enforceable Under The Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
Foreign Nation Judgments - If State Law Provides For The Enforceability Of Foreign Judgments, The Judgment Is Enforceable Without Determination Of Whether The Arbitration Award On Which It Is Based Is Independently Enforceable Under The Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards, John W. Kindt
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Icelandic Fisheries Dispute: A Decision Is Finally Rendered,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
The Icelandic Fisheries Dispute: A Decision Is Finally Rendered, Roger A. Briney
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Panama: The Proposed Transfer Of The Canal And Canal Zone By Treaty,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
Panama: The Proposed Transfer Of The Canal And Canal Zone By Treaty, Michael D. Simpson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty In Traditional China,
2016
University of Illinois
The Death Penalty In Traditional China, Chin Kim, Theodore R. Leblang
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
United States Obligations Under Status Of Forces Agreements: A New Method Of Extradition?,
2016
US Army Trial Judiciary
United States Obligations Under Status Of Forces Agreements: A New Method Of Extradition?, William J. Norton
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Rent-Seeking And Inter Partes Review: An Analysis Of Invalidity Assertion Entities In Patent Law,
2016
Oklahoma State University
Rent-Seeking And Inter Partes Review: An Analysis Of Invalidity Assertion Entities In Patent Law, W. Michael Schuster
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
This Essay is the first analysis of a recent entrant on the patent landscape: the Invalidity Assertion Entity (IAE). IAEs engage in rent-seeking by demanding payment from patent holders in exchange for not attempting to invalidate their patents through administrative action before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The response to IAEs has been uniformly negative. Reflexive proposals have been raised in Congress (unsurprisingly) to terminate the IAE business model. In contrast to the common response to IAEs, this Essay discusses how profit-driven IAEs may generate socially beneficial externalities and why legislating to end the IAE business model is imprudent.
Equal Justice Under Law - Tax Aid To Education,
2016
St. John's University School of Law
Equal Justice Under Law - Tax Aid To Education, William J. Kenealy, S.J.
The Catholic Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Uncle Sam Is Watching You: A Recommendation For Minnesota Legislation Regarding Police Drone Use,
2016
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Uncle Sam Is Watching You: A Recommendation For Minnesota Legislation Regarding Police Drone Use, Joe R. Paquette
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Body, My Property, My Baby? The Extension Of Property Rights To Sexual Reproductive Cells And Embryos,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
My Body, My Property, My Baby? The Extension Of Property Rights To Sexual Reproductive Cells And Embryos, Chanel Vegh
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
No abstract provided.
Kejahatan Lingkungan Oleh Korporasi: Mencari Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dan Pemimpin/Pengurus Korporasi Untuk Kejahatan Lingkungan Di Indonesia?,
2016
Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia
Kejahatan Lingkungan Oleh Korporasi: Mencari Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dan Pemimpin/Pengurus Korporasi Untuk Kejahatan Lingkungan Di Indonesia?, Muhammad Andri Gunawan Wibisana
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
It is very likely that most environmental crimes involve corporation, in the sense that the crimes were conducted within the scope of corporation and on behalf of the corporation. This contribution attempts to answer the questions of how corporate criminal liability has evolved in several jurisdictions, and how this concept has been interpreted and implemented in Indonesia. The contribution explains the development of corporate criminal liability, and classifies it into liability for corporation and liability for corporate officers. Based on such theoretical foundations, the contribution critically analyses the formulation of corporate criminal liability and officers' liability in various legislations related …
Right, Title And Interest In The Territorial Sea: Federal And State Claims In The United States,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
Right, Title And Interest In The Territorial Sea: Federal And State Claims In The United States, Stephen M. Kiser, Dan A. Aldridge Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Soviet Accession To The Universal Copyright Convention: Possible Implications For Future Foreign Publication Of Dissidents’ Works,
2016
University of Georgia School of Law
Soviet Accession To The Universal Copyright Convention: Possible Implications For Future Foreign Publication Of Dissidents’ Works, Lee J. Ross Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Trading With Socialist Partners,
2016
Saint Louis University
Trading With Socialist Partners, Josef Rohlik
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Mariculture: A New Ocean Use,
2016
University of Georgia
Mariculture: A New Ocean Use, J. Owens Smith, David L. Marshall
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Environmental Protection By Coastal States: The Paradigm From Marine Transport Of Petroleum,
2016
Fordham University School of Law
Environmental Protection By Coastal States: The Paradigm From Marine Transport Of Petroleum, Joseph C. Sweeny
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Device Of Fiction In Public International Law,
2016
Université de Bruxelles
The Device Of Fiction In Public International Law, Jean J. A. Salmon
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Scrivener’S Error,
2016
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Scrivener’S Error, Ryan D. Doerfler
Northwestern University Law Review
It is widely accepted that courts may correct legislative drafting mistakes, i.e., so-called scrivener’s errors, if and only if such mistakes are “absolutely clear.” The rationale is that if a court were to recognize a less clear error, it might be “rewriting” the statute rather than correcting a technical mistake.
This Article argues that the standard is much too strict. The current rationale ignores that courts can “rewrite,” i.e., misinterpret, a statute both by recognizing an error and by failing to do so. Accordingly, because the current doctrine is designed to protect against one type of mistake (false positives) but …
