Proposition 59:
Corporations. Political Spending. Federal Constitutional
Protections. Legislative Advisory Question,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 59: Corporations. Political Spending. Federal Constitutional Protections. Legislative Advisory Question, Anam Hasan, Brian Parino
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 67:
Ban On Single-Use Plastic Bags,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 67: Ban On Single-Use Plastic Bags, Ryan Mahoney, Scott Seaward
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
California Initiative Review Fall 2016: Initiatives At A Glance,
2016
University of the Pacific
California Initiative Review Fall 2016: Initiatives At A Glance, University Of The Pacific, Mcgeorge School Of Law
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 62:
Death Penalty.
“The Justice That Works Act Of 2016",
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 62: Death Penalty. “The Justice That Works Act Of 2016", Veronica E. Bravo, Jessica Gosney
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 65:
Carryout Bags. Charges,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 65: Carryout Bags. Charges, Maral Farsi, Justin Hansen
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 64:
Marijuana Legalization,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 64: Marijuana Legalization, Gage Marchini, Brian Parino
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 52:
Medi-Cal Hospital Fee Program,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 52: Medi-Cal Hospital Fee Program, Brittney Barsotti
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 53:Revenue Bonds. Statewide Voter Approval,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 53:Revenue Bonds. Statewide Voter Approval, Justin Hansen, Gage Marchini
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 54:
Legislature. Legislation And Proceedings.
“California Legislature Transparency Act”,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 54: Legislature. Legislation And Proceedings. “California Legislature Transparency Act”, Brian Russ, Rachel Simons
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 55:
Tax Extension To Fund Education And Healthcare,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 55: Tax Extension To Fund Education And Healthcare, Anam Hasan, Melerie Michael
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 56:
Cigarette Tax To Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention,
Research, And Law Enforcement,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 56: Cigarette Tax To Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, And Law Enforcement, Stella Huynh, Samantha Huynh
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 57:
Criminal Sentence. Parole. Juvenile Criminal Proceedings
And Sentencing.
“The Public Safety And Rehabilitation Act Of 2016”,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 57: Criminal Sentence. Parole. Juvenile Criminal Proceedings And Sentencing. “The Public Safety And Rehabilitation Act Of 2016”, Navnit Bhandal, Tessa Nevarez
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 60:
Adult Films. Condoms. Health Requirements,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 60: Adult Films. Condoms. Health Requirements, Melody Aguilar, Christine R. Mahackian
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 63:
Firearms. Ammunition Sales.
“Safety For All Act Of 2016”,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 63: Firearms. Ammunition Sales. “Safety For All Act Of 2016”, Kc Souza, Stella Huynh
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 61: State Prescription Drug Purchases. Pricing
Standards,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 61: State Prescription Drug Purchases. Pricing Standards, Brittney Barsotti, Melerie Michael
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Proposition 66:
Death Penalty. Procedures.
“Death Penalty Reform And Savings Act Of 2016”,
2016
University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
Proposition 66: Death Penalty. Procedures. “Death Penalty Reform And Savings Act Of 2016”, Samantha Huynh, Christine R. Mahackian
California Initiative Review (CIR)
No abstract provided.
Legislation's Culture,
2016
Hofstra University School of Law
Legislation's Culture, Richard K. Neumann Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can Prostitution Law Reform Curb Sex Trafficking? Theory And Evidence On Scale Substitution, And Replacement Effects,
2016
Harvard Kennedy School
Can Prostitution Law Reform Curb Sex Trafficking? Theory And Evidence On Scale Substitution, And Replacement Effects, Simon Hedlin
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Sex trafficking, a pervasive problem in many parts of the world, has become increasingly salient to policymakers and the general public. Activists, politicians, and scholars continue to engage in debates about how best to curb it. This Article discusses one especially contentious dimension of these debates: does banning prostitution reduce sex trafficking? Or is legalizing prostitution the optimal approach? Or is there a third, better way? Proceeding both theoretically and empirically, this Article seeks to cast light on the relationship between different types of prostitution laws and the prevalence of sex trafficking and human trafficking. It attempts to make three …
Shedding Light On The "Going Dark" Problem And The Encryption Debate,
2016
University of Michigan Law School
Shedding Light On The "Going Dark" Problem And The Encryption Debate, John Mylan Traylor
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In an effort to protect the enormous volume of sensitive and valuable data that travels across the Internet and is stored on personal devices, private companies have created encryption software to secure data from criminals, hackers, and terrorists who wish to steal it. The greatest benefit of encryption also creates the biggest problem: Encryption software has become so secure that often not even the government can bypass it. The “Going Dark” problem—a scenario in which the government has obtained the legal authority to search a suspected criminal’s encrypted device but lacks the technical ability to do so—is becoming increasingly common. …
From Integrationism To Equal Protection: Tenbroek And The Next 25 Years Of Disability Rights,
2016
University of Michigan Law School
From Integrationism To Equal Protection: Tenbroek And The Next 25 Years Of Disability Rights, Samuel R. Bagenstos
Articles
If there is one person who we can say is most responsible for the legal theory of the disability rights movement, that person is Jacobus tenBroek. Professor tenBroek was an influential scholar of disability law, whose writings in the 1960s laid the groundwork for the disability rights laws we have today. He was also an influential disability rights activist. He was one of the founders and the president for more than two decades of the National Federation of the Blind, one of the first-and for many years undisputedly the most effective-of the organizations made up of people with disabilities that …
