أدوات الحجاج القانوني وتقاناته: الأحكام في المحاكم القطرية نموذج,
2020
أستاذ جامعي / جامعة قطر
أدوات الحجاج القانوني وتقاناته: الأحكام في المحاكم القطرية نموذج, Ahmad Safar
Al Jinan الجنان
Court decrees are significantly peculiar due to the unique nature of the juridical system and its personnel. Such decrees are governed by logic and the use of certain terms and linguistic patterns which are completely different than those of debates and other speeches which are used for political campaigns, advertisements, marketing and other communication purposes. The legal language is a language of conviction which relies on rules of logic, solid argument and reasoning. Therefore, a court judgment is a manifestation of the truth, which the judge reached to after deep critical thinking and argumentative reasoning. Thus the language that the …
Law Library Blog (August 2020): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive,
2020
Roger Williams University
Law Library Blog (August 2020): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Newsletters/Blog
No abstract provided.
Rhetorical Repetition,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
Rhetorical Repetition, Patrick Barry
Articles
When it comes to persuading judges, boardrooms, or even just co-workers, many lawyers shy away from repetition. They remain committed to the idea, often developed in college, that good writing is associated with having (and showing) a big vocabulary. They mistakenly think the best thesaurus wins. This essay explores that error and offers ways to correct it.
Unsettled Questions In Student Speech Law,
2020
Belmont University College of Law
Unsettled Questions In Student Speech Law, David L. Hudson Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
More than fifty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court famously proclaimed in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” In subsequent decades, the Supreme Court reduced the level of free-speech protections for public school students, but Tinker is still the lodestar decision.
There remain several areas of uncertainty regarding the scope of student (K–12) First Amendment rights. This Article addresses three of those main areas: (1) whether a student’s speech can be limited by the unruly behavior …
In The Midst Of Change, A Few Truths Remain—A Review Of Trazenfeld And Jarvis’S Florida Legal Malpractice Law,
2020
University of Miami School of Law
In The Midst Of Change, A Few Truths Remain—A Review Of Trazenfeld And Jarvis’S Florida Legal Malpractice Law, Jan L. Jacobowitz Ms.
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Abstract forthcoming.
Foreword: Legal Essays: A Checklist,
2020
Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Foreword: Legal Essays: A Checklist, Reagan Seidler, Sarah Macleod
Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies
Good legal writing is more science than art. It persuades not by its rhetoric but by the impregnability of its research method. It answers its question using a testable, falsifiable, and repeatable method, so that others would choose to follow the same steps and come to the same conclusion.
At the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies (DJLS), we read scores of papers each year from law schools across the country. They show us that, nationwide, many authors misunderstand the purpose of a research paper. It is not a memo, nor is it an op-ed. The goal is to use a …
Student Wellness And Mental Wellbeing,
2020
William & Mary Law School
Student Wellness And Mental Wellbeing, Emily Bishop, Stevie Leahy
William & Mary Law School’s Conference for Excellence in Online Teaching Legal Research & Writing
This presentation will focus on centering the mental wellbeing of students for the 2020-21 academic year. The incoming cohort has unique stressors that are compounded by challenging current events - as educators, we are also challenged to engage and connect with these students in a virtual environment. This presentation will give practical strategies to engage with students that facilitate and foster mental health, with an eye to anchoring our tactics within a legal research and writing curriculum. The presentation aims to encourage healthy dialogue on how to de-stigmatize mental wellbeing and best support our students. This goal, more so now …
Brief Of The Boston University Center For Antiracist Research As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioner In Larry Thompson V. Police Officer Pagiel Clark, Shield #28472; Police Officer Paul Montefusco, Shield #10580; Police Officer Phillip Romano, Shield #6295; Police Officer Gerard Bouwmans, Shield #2102, Respondents,
2020
Boston University School of Law
Brief Of The Boston University Center For Antiracist Research As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Petitioner In Larry Thompson V. Police Officer Pagiel Clark, Shield #28472; Police Officer Paul Montefusco, Shield #10580; Police Officer Phillip Romano, Shield #6295; Police Officer Gerard Bouwmans, Shield #2102, Respondents, Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Jasmine Gonzales Rose, Neda Khoshkhoo, Caitlin Glass
Faculty Scholarship
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE
The Boston University Center for Antiracist Research (the “Center”) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit university-based research institution that convenes researchers, scholars, and policy experts across disciplines to find novel and practical ways to understand, explain, and solve seemingly intractable problems of racial injustice and inequity. The Center’s interest in this case arises from its expertise in researching and understanding the harms of policies, practices, and actions that produce and sustain racial inequities, and in advancing antiracist alternatives that promote racial equity.
The Second Circuit’s interpretation of the so-called “favorable termination rule,” which imposes an “indications-of-innocence” standard, is …
Table Of Contents & Masthead,
2020
Pepperdine University
Table Of Contents & Masthead,
2020
Pepperdine University
No Matter How Loud I Shout: Legal Writing As Gender Sidelining,
2020
S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
No Matter How Loud I Shout: Legal Writing As Gender Sidelining, Leslie Culver
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, I argue that viewing legal writing as a mode of gender sidelining uncovers the urgency for law schools to provide unitary tenure for legal writing programs across all law schools. I recognize that many legal writing faculty are employed under ABA Standard 405(c), a seemingly second-best option to traditional tenure tracks. As Professor Kathy Stanchi (UNLV) comments, however, while Standard 405(c) offers some respite from “job insecurity, intellectual disparagement, and pay inequity,” it ultimately serves as an “institutionalized bar to professional advancement divorced from any reasonable measure of merit.” This essay takes Stanchi’s framing of 405(c) as …
The Cultural (Re)Turn: The Case For Teaching Culturally Responsive Lawyering,
2020
Brooklyn Law School
The Cultural (Re)Turn: The Case For Teaching Culturally Responsive Lawyering, Danielle L. Tully
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Against The Grain: The Secret Role Of Dissents In Integrating Rhetoric Across The Curriculum,
2020
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Against The Grain: The Secret Role Of Dissents In Integrating Rhetoric Across The Curriculum, Mark A. Hannah, Susie Salmon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
What Probate Courts Cite: Lessons From The New York County Surrogate’S Court 2017-2018,
2020
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
What Probate Courts Cite: Lessons From The New York County Surrogate’S Court 2017-2018, Bridget J. Crawford
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
By knowing what a judge cites, one may better understand what the judge believes is important, how the judge understands her work will be used, and how the judge conceives of the judicial role. Empirical scholars have devoted serious attention to the citation practices and patterns of the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Courts of Appeals, and multiple state supreme courts. Remarkably little is known about what probate courts cite. This Article makes three principal claims — one empirical, one interpretative, and one normative. This Article demonstrates through data, derived from a study of all decrees …
Cicero And Barack Obama: How To Unite The Republic Without Losing Your Head,
2020
Georgetown University Law Center
Cicero And Barack Obama: How To Unite The Republic Without Losing Your Head, Michael J. Cedrone
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
By turning to the works of Cicero and Barack Obama, we can find models of how to speak into crises in ways that foster unity. Cicero’s Catilinarian orations were delivered in 63 BCE, during his one-year term as consul—the highest elected official in the Roman Republic. Facing a conspiracy by certain noble Romans, Cicero delivered a series of four speeches that drove the chief conspirator out of Rome, turned public opinion against the conspirators, and convinced the Roman Senate to support the death penalty for conspirators who remained and were captured in Rome. The Fourth Catilinarian, in which Cicero advocates …
Disappearing Act: Are Free Speech Rights Decreasing?,
2020
Angelo State University
Disappearing Act: Are Free Speech Rights Decreasing?, Michael Conklin
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.
Anti-Slapp Coverage And The First Amendment: Hurdles To Defamation Suits In Political Campaigns,
2020
Belmont University College of Law
Anti-Slapp Coverage And The First Amendment: Hurdles To Defamation Suits In Political Campaigns, David L. Hudson Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
Defamation cases often arise out of intemperate or offensive statements made in political campaigns. These comments may refer to a candidate’s criminal history, familial conduct, or other matters. Whatever the subject, emotions undoubtedly run high during hotly contested campaigns. However, First Amendment protection is at its zenith when speakers engage in political speech, and speech about political candidates is inherently political speech. Thus, defamation suits arising out of political campaigns face significant hurdles, including (1) anti-SLAPP statutes and a greater public awareness of SLAPP suits; (2) a history and tradition of mudslinging and enhanced protection of political speech during political …
Essay: Cyberbullying And Freedom Of Speech,
2020
Belmont University College of Law
Essay: Cyberbullying And Freedom Of Speech, David L. Hudson Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
Part I of this essay examines state cyberbullying laws. These laws vary a lot in terms of language and coverage but this part attempts to group these different state laws into different categories. This section categorizes cyberbullying laws into two main categories—(1) those that treat cyberbullying as a crime and (2) those that address cyberbullying as a violation of a school’s code of conduct. Part II of this essay then addresses court decisions that deal with cyberbullying. Once again, this essay examines the topic from both the perspective of (1) criminal law decisions and (2) school law decisions.
Law School News: Dean's Distinguished Service Award: Raquel Ortiz 05-22-2020,
2020
Roger Williams University School of Law
Law School News: Dean's Distinguished Service Award: Raquel Ortiz 05-22-2020, Michael M. Bowden
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Essay: Understanding First Amendment Freedoms Through The Remarkable Life Of "The Greatest" --Muhammad Ali,
2020
Belmont University College of Law
Essay: Understanding First Amendment Freedoms Through The Remarkable Life Of "The Greatest" --Muhammad Ali, David L. Hudson Jr.
Law Faculty Scholarship
Muhammad Ali represents much more than a great sports figure and one of the greatest fighters of all time.He is also the epitome of the citizen protected by the First Amendment– a man who paid dearly for his religious convictions and provocative speech, but found a defense in the amendment’s forty-five words. An examination of First Amendment freedoms through the prism of Ali can teach us much about the fragility of the amendment but also the strength that we all can find in it. The First Amendment provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting …
