January 16, 2017: President Obama’S Accomplishments,
2017
Duquesne University
January 16, 2017: President Obama’S Accomplishments, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “President Obama’s Accomplishments“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
January 13, 2017: "The Way It Is Nowadays, Unless I See Positive Proof, It's All A Lie",
2017
Duquesne University
January 13, 2017: "The Way It Is Nowadays, Unless I See Positive Proof, It's All A Lie", Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, "The way it is nowadays, unless I see positive proof, it's all a lie" discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
January 10, 2017: The Public Trust Litigation,
2017
Duquesne University
January 10, 2017: The Public Trust Litigation, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Public Trust Litigation“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
January 5, 2017: Why Law Matters, The Presidential Transition,
2017
Duquesne University
January 5, 2017: Why Law Matters, The Presidential Transition, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Why Law Matters, the presidential transition“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
January 4, 2017: Is Secularism A Nonnegotiable Aspect Of Liberal Constitutionalism?,
2017
Duquesne University
January 4, 2017: Is Secularism A Nonnegotiable Aspect Of Liberal Constitutionalism?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Is Secularism A Nonnegotiable Aspect of Liberal Constitutionalism?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Democracy, Law, Compliance,
2017
University of Michigan Law School
Democracy, Law, Compliance, Don Herzog
Articles
Professors Schauer and McAdams both seek a more or less sweepingly general theory of why we obey the law. But we should split, not lump. There are different reasons different actors in different social settings obey different laws–not only, but not least, out of regard for democratic decision making.
Has Nihilism Politicized The Supreme Court Nomination Process?,
2017
Duquesne University
Has Nihilism Politicized The Supreme Court Nomination Process?, Bruce Ledewitz
Ledewitz Papers
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online periodicals
Emigres: Lost In A Sea Of Ignorance,
2017
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University
Emigres: Lost In A Sea Of Ignorance, Ronald C. Griffin
Faculty Books and Book Contributions
In EMIGRES: Lost in a Sea of Ignorance, Prof. Griffin states that austerity grips western nations, where governments spend paltry sums on welfare, refugees, and migrants. In his essay, Griffin parses a trove of knowledge about welfare and what's being done for needy people. There is a recounting of an Irish case, a report on spectacles in the US, and a narrative about the troubles in Europe stirred-up by Syrian refugees.
Religious Freedom As A Technology Of Modern Secular Governance,
2017
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Religious Freedom As A Technology Of Modern Secular Governance, Peter G. Danchin
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
On Hostility And Hospitality: Othering Pierre Legrand,
2017
Washington and Lee University School of Law
On Hostility And Hospitality: Othering Pierre Legrand, Russell A. Miller
Scholarly Articles
Pierre Legrand's return to the pages of the American Journal of Comparative Law after nearly twenty years is cause for reflection on the reasons for this prolific comparatist's absence from one of the discipline's leading scholarly fora. One reason is the widespread disdain aimed at Legrand as a result of his persistent, sharply critical, and often pointedly personal crusade against the discipline's accepted approaches and their most prominent practitioners. This is partly the nature of the article he publishes in this collection, which features a no-holds-bared, uncomplimentary assessment of the work of James Gordley. In this Article I argue that …
The Role Of Religiously Affiliated Law Schools In The Renewal Of American Democracy,
2017
Duquesne University
The Role Of Religiously Affiliated Law Schools In The Renewal Of American Democracy, Bruce Ledewitz
Ledewitz Papers
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online periodicals.
Tracking Hate Speech Acts As Incitement To Genocide In International Criminal Law,
2017
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Tracking Hate Speech Acts As Incitement To Genocide In International Criminal Law, Shannon Fyfe
Scholarly Articles
In this article, I argue that we need a better understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of the current debates in international law surrounding hate speech and inchoate crimes. I construct a theoretical basis for speech acts as incitement to genocide, distinguishing these speech acts from speech as genocide and speech denying genocide by integrating international law with concepts drawn from speech act theory and moral philosophy. I use the case drawn on by many commentators in this area of international criminal law, the trial of media executives for the roles they played in the Rwandan genocide through public speech acts …
Is Religion A Non-Negotiable Aspect Of Liberal Constitutionalism?,
2017
Duquesne University
Is Religion A Non-Negotiable Aspect Of Liberal Constitutionalism?, Bruce Ledewitz
Ledewitz Papers
Published scholarship collected from academic journals, law reviews, newspaper publications & online periodicals.
Relational Criminal Liability,
2017
University of North Dakota School of Law
Relational Criminal Liability, Steven R. Morrison
Florida State University Law Review
“Relational criminal liability,” or one person’s criminal liability for the actions of another by way of a group of which both individuals are a part, generates a fundamental tension between collectivist and individualist approaches to liability. The collectivist approach, which reifies the group qua group, enables individuals to be liable for the acts of the group and the group to be liable for the acts of individuals. The individualist approach treats ind-viduals qua individuals, holding them liable only for their own conduct.
This tension sounds both in moral philosophy and legal theory. As to philosophy, Michael Bratman, Margaret Gilbert, and …
Jack,
2017
Wayne State University
Abductive Reasoning In Wto Law,
2017
University of Western Ontario
Abductive Reasoning In Wto Law, Chios Carmody
Law Publications
Law is about many things, but at base it is about rights and obligations. That jural correlation is established and sustained by means of reasoning. We hold that an actor has a right or obligation by virtue of reasoning that classically occurs in one of two forms. An obligation creates a right by means of inductive logic that rests on the conviction of similar instances in the past and the need for proof. It can also create an obligation by means of deductive logic, that is, the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) that are used to …
Beyond Administrative Tunnel Vision: Widening The Lens Of Costs And Benefits,
2017
University of Denver
Beyond Administrative Tunnel Vision: Widening The Lens Of Costs And Benefits, Govind Persad
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Choices in one sector or department of public policy, such as health, frequently produce costs and benefits in other sectors, such as education or the environment. In this article, I argue that administrators should not make decisions in ways that ignore effects on other policy sectors, and arguablythough more debatably-should not give special priority to the interests of their own sector In Part I, I review contexts where administrators are directed to ignore or give a lower priority to effects on other policy sectors. In Part II, I lay out an argument that agencies should not ignore these effects (using …
Bankruptcy Beyond Status Maintenance,
2017
University of Denver
Bankruptcy Beyond Status Maintenance, Govind Persad
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the tendency of current American bankruptcy law to maintain the social and economic status of middle- and upper-class debtors while doing much less to assist poorer debtors and non-debtors. In doing so, it examines and categorizes various aspects of statutory and case law that allow debtors to preserve their prior economic status. After reconstructing and rebutting the normative arguments offered in defense of these provisions, it suggests a proposal for reforming bankruptcy law to emphasize goals other than the maintenance of economic status. Part I of the Article begins by describing ways in which current bankruptcy law …
The Dignity Canon,
2017
Law Clerk to the Hon. John D. Bates, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
The Dignity Canon, Noah B. Lindell
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
Human dignity is not a freestanding constitutional right, but it is a strongly held constitutional value. To this point, however, human dignity has had no place in statutory interpretation. This Article argues that courts should create a dignity canon of interpretation, which would operate as a clear statement rule. If laws are to be construed to limit individual dignity, the legislature must expressly this plainly. By conducting re-dos of three Supreme Court cases in the areas of civil rights, criminal procedure, and personal health, the Article shows the promise of the dignity canon.
The Significance Of Injustice For Bioethics,
2017
S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
The Significance Of Injustice For Bioethics, Leslie P. Francis
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
In my judgment, applied ethics is ineluctably non-ideal and partial compliance theory. It’s ethics in the context of unjust institutions and conduct. Theorizing or teaching about concepts such as autonomy in abstraction from this recognition is misleading. Instead, questions such as how to realize autonomy should be framed in the context of incomplete justice. There’s much to be learned from the past nearly 50 years of discussions of justice to help with this enterprise, but they are too little known or discussed in much contemporary bioethics.
