Personality Disruption As Mental Torture: The Cia, Interrogational Abuse, And The U.S. Torture Act,
2019
Georgetown University Law Center
Personality Disruption As Mental Torture: The Cia, Interrogational Abuse, And The U.S. Torture Act, David Luban, Katherine S. Newell
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This Article is a contribution to the torture debate. It argues that the abusive interrogation tactics used by the United States in what was then called the “global war on terrorism” are, unequivocally, torture under U.S. law. To some readers, this might sound like déjà vu all over again. Hasn’t this issue been picked over for nearly fifteen years? It has, but we think the legal analysis we offer has been mostly overlooked. We argue that the basic character of the CIA’s interrogation of so-called “high-value detainees” has been misunderstood: both lawyers and commentators have placed far too much emphasis …
November 28, 2019: Happy Thanksgiving,
2019
Duquesne University
November 28, 2019: Happy Thanksgiving, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Happy Thanksgiving“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
November 22, 2019: What Is The Point Of This Column?,
2019
Duquesne University
November 22, 2019: What Is The Point Of This Column?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What is the Point of this Column?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Examining Pharmaceutical Exceptionalism: Intellectual Property, Practical Expediency, And Global Health,
2019
University of Denver
Examining Pharmaceutical Exceptionalism: Intellectual Property, Practical Expediency, And Global Health, Govind Persad
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Advocates, activists, and academics have criticized pharmaceutical intellectual property ("pharma IP") rights as obstacles to access to medicines for the global poor. These criticisms of pharma IP holders are frequently exceptionalist: they focus on pharma IP holders while ignoring whether others also bear obligations to assist patients in need. These others include holders of other lucrative IP rights, such as music copyrights or technology patents; firms, such as energy companies and banks, that do not rely on IP; and wealthy private individuals. Their resources could be used to aid patients by providing direct medical assistance, funding prizes or biomedical research, …
November 19, 2019: Court-Packing,
2019
Duquesne University
November 19, 2019: Court-Packing, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Court-Packing“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
November 14, 2019: What’S Wrong With Impeachment,
2019
Duquesne University
November 14, 2019: What’S Wrong With Impeachment, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What’s Wrong With Impeachment“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Two Forms Of Formalism,
2019
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Two Forms Of Formalism, Dan Priel
All Papers
In this paper I argue that what is called ‘formalism’ is actually two very different views: I call one ‘conceptualism’ and the other ‘doctrinalism’. The former is deductive and ‘philosophical’ whereas the latter is inductive and ‘pragmatic’. While the two views have sometimes been aligned in opposition to certain views they were both in opposition to, they are actually fundamentally at odds with each other. I demonstrate this by identifying eight parameters on which the two are opposed. After presenting the two views, I turn to evaluating the two views. I first argue that conceptualism is indefensible, and that though …
Contractual Communication,
2019
Georgetown University Law Center
Contractual Communication, Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In this Response, I will investigate the foundations of both shared and unshared meaning in legal communication. Part I takes a step back from contractual communication and offers a preliminary sketch of a general model of legal communication; the sketch draws on speech act theory and the work of Paul Grice, extending and modifying many of the insights developed by Kar and Radin. Part II turns to contractual communication, differentiating distinct “situations of contractual communication” and interrogating Kar and Radin’s Shared Meaning Analysis. Part III interrogates Kar and Radin’s distinction between “contract” and “pseudo-contract.” The conclusion of the Response briefly …
November 7, 2019: The Politics Of Carl Schmidt Versus The Politics Of Abraham Lincoln,
2019
Duquesne University
November 7, 2019: The Politics Of Carl Schmidt Versus The Politics Of Abraham Lincoln, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Politics of Carl Schmidt versus the politics of Abraham Lincoln“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Replaying The Past: Roles For Emotion In Judicial Invocations Of Legislative History, And Precedent,
2019
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Replaying The Past: Roles For Emotion In Judicial Invocations Of Legislative History, And Precedent, Emily Kidd White
Articles & Book Chapters
Legal reasoning in the common law tradition requires judges to draw on concepts, and examples that are meant to resonate with a particular emotional import and operate in judicial reasoning as though they do. Judicial applications of constitutional rights are regularly interpreted by reference to past violations (either through precedent, contextual framings, and/or legislative history), which in turn elicit a series of emotions which work to deepen and intensify judicial understandings of a right guarantee (freedom of association, freedom of expression, equality, security of the person, etc.). This paper examines the way in which invocations of past political histories, and …
A Literary Lens Into Constitutional Interpretation And A Possible Synthesis Of Natural And Positive Law: The Silmarillion,
2019
Texas A&M University School of Law
A Literary Lens Into Constitutional Interpretation And A Possible Synthesis Of Natural And Positive Law: The Silmarillion, Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln Iv
Student Scholarship
The nature of identity in the United States lies in the Constitution. Perhaps this is due to “veneration” of the document. It has also been argued that the Declaration of Independence holds a seminal role in the American identity.
The rift seems to occur with the concept of a “living constitution,” whereby the concept of an ever-evolving jurisprudence allows for an evolving interpretation of the Constitution as society changes.
This rift can be demonstrated by the world of J.R.R. Tolkien. In The Lord of the Rings and Silmarillion, the various languages of groups of Middle Earth represent and have distinct …
Contractual Communication,
2019
Texas A&M University School of Law
Contractual Communication, Lawrence B. Solum
Faculty Scholarship
In Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis, Professors Robin Bradley Kar and Margaret Jane Radin develop an important theory of the nature of contract that draws on Paul Grice’s influential theory of meaning. That theory has significant implications for contract doctrine, in particular for questions about the enforceability of so-called “contracts of adhesion” in particular and for “boilerplate” in general. But at the most fundamental level, Kar and Radin’s work is about the nature of contractual communication. They answer the question, “How do contracts mean?,” by proposing a theoretical structure, which they name “Shared Meaning Analysis.” This Essay focuses on …
American Legion V. American Humanist Association,
2019
Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
American Legion V. American Humanist Association, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The separation of church and state is a key element of American democracy, but its interpretation has been challenged as the country grows more diverse. In American Legion v. American Humanist Association, the Supreme Court adopted a new standard to analyze whether a religious symbol on public land maintained by public funding violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause.
October 27, 2019: The Shooter And The Death Penalty,
2019
Duquesne University
October 27, 2019: The Shooter And The Death Penalty, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Shooter and the Death Penalty“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
October 22, 2019: What Is The Universe?,
2019
Duquesne University
October 22, 2019: What Is The Universe?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What is the Universe?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
October 14, 2019: Why The Democrats Need To Tap The Brakes On Impeachment,
2019
Duquesne University
October 14, 2019: Why The Democrats Need To Tap The Brakes On Impeachment, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Why the Democrats Need to Tap the Brakes on Impeachment“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
October 9, 2019: Yom Kippur And The Shootings,
2019
Duquesne University
October 9, 2019: Yom Kippur And The Shootings, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Yom Kippur and the Shootings“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Delinking The "Human" From Human Rights: Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism And The Future Of Human Rights,
2019
Columbia University
Delinking The "Human" From Human Rights: Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism And The Future Of Human Rights, A. Kayum Ahmed
Biennial Conference: The Social Practice of Human Rights
Human rights discourses are deeply embedded in an epistemic anthropocentricism that centers the human in human rights. However, conceptions of what constitutes the human are being eroded through the development of artificial intelligence, bio-hacking and transhumanism, all of which, support the emergence of new kinds of humans.These emergent humans include the enhanced human who possesses abilities that compel us to reconsider the parameters of humanness, as well as computer systems that demonstrate characteristics thought of as uniquely human. The blurring of the divide between human and machine therefore compels us to reconsider our understanding of the human in human rights, …
Decolonizing Human Rights: Sovereignty. Disruption. Tactics.,
2019
Open Society Foundations
Decolonizing Human Rights: Sovereignty. Disruption. Tactics., A. Kayum Ahmed
Biennial Conference: The Social Practice of Human Rights
Despite its emancipatory potential, human rights remains locked in a form of epistemic coloniality that defers to Euro-American knowledge and reinforces anthropocentric exceptionalism. In order to employ human rights as a source of emancipation, human rights must itself be emancipated—it must be decolonized. Drawing on the notion of 'decoloniality' as a framework that advances radical possibilities by delinking from structural racism, patriarchy and class embedded in capitalism and Western modernity, a typology of human rights as sovereignty, disruption, and tactics is developed as a way of understanding human rights from the position of the colonized.
October 2, 2019: What Are The High Holy Days About?,
2019
Duquesne University
October 2, 2019: What Are The High Holy Days About?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What are the High Holy Days About?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
