Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. H - Gultekin Deposition (Google Adwords Product Manager Director),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. H - Gultekin Deposition (Google Adwords Product Manager Director), Baris Gultekin
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 29 - Deposition Of Baris Gultekin (Google Product Manager Director),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 29 - Deposition Of Baris Gultekin (Google Product Manager Director), Baris Gultekin
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 57 - Deposition Of Baris Gultekin (Google Group Product Manager For Adwords),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 57 - Deposition Of Baris Gultekin (Google Group Product Manager For Adwords), Baris Gultekin
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Russia & Legal Harmonization: An Historical Inquiry Into Ip Reform As Global Convergence And Resistance,
2010
Visiting Scholar, Cornell Law School (2009-2010)
Russia & Legal Harmonization: An Historical Inquiry Into Ip Reform As Global Convergence And Resistance, Boris N. Mamlyuk
Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers
This Article examines several waves of intellectual property (IP) regulation reform in Russia, starting with a specific examination into early Soviet attempts to regulate intellectual property. Historical analysis is useful to illustrate areas of theoretical convergence, divergence and tension between state ideology, positive law, and “law in action.” The relevance of these tensions for post-Soviet legal reform may appear tenuous. However, insofar as IP enforcement has been one of the largest hurdles for Russia’s prolonged accession to the WTO, these historical precedents may help to explain the apparent theoretical or political disconnect between the WTO and Russia. If Russian policymakers …
Vol. Vii, Tab 38 - Ex. 60 - Eichmann Deposition (Rosetta Coo),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Vii, Tab 38 - Ex. 60 - Eichmann Deposition (Rosetta Coo), Eric Eichmann
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 42 - Ex. 7 - Deposition Edward Blair (Expert On Statistics For Google),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 42 - Ex. 7 - Deposition Edward Blair (Expert On Statistics For Google), Edward Blair
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 42 - Ex. 6 - Eric Eichmann Deposition (Rosetta Chief Operating Officer),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Ix, Tab 42 - Ex. 6 - Eric Eichmann Deposition (Rosetta Chief Operating Officer), Eric Eichmann
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 55 - Deposition Of Eric Eichmann (Rosetta Stone Chief Operating Officer),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 55 - Deposition Of Eric Eichmann (Rosetta Stone Chief Operating Officer), Eric Eichmann
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 50 - Deposition Of Edward Blair (Statistical Analysis Expert For Google),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 50 - Deposition Of Edward Blair (Statistical Analysis Expert For Google), Edward Blair
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 27 - Deposition Of Eric Eichmann (Rosetta Stone Chief Operating Officer),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 27 - Deposition Of Eric Eichmann (Rosetta Stone Chief Operating Officer), Eric Eichmann
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 24 - Deposition Of Edward Blair (Expert For Google),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 24 - Deposition Of Edward Blair (Expert For Google), Edward Blair
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 12 - Deposition Of Simon Berriochoa (Rosetta Stone Customer Care Group),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 12 - Deposition Of Simon Berriochoa (Rosetta Stone Customer Care Group), Simon Berriochoa
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Music Markets And Mythologies,
2010
IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
Music Markets And Mythologies, Henry H. Perritt Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
New technologies have started a revolution in the music marketplace. As new business models emerge, major firms in the popular music industry have mounted a campaign on the premise that the world of popular music faces a grave threat from illicit filing sharing. This article makes the case against that campaign. It discusses how new technologies are currently reshaping the marketplace to allow a wider range of new artists, as well as more direct access between musicians and their fans. It also predicts how future demand for popular music will increase due to portability, and ultimately recommends directions for marketplace …
Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso,
2010
Boston University School of Law
Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
It is sometimes observed that questions of "justice in acquisition" do not much arise any more. However, judges face those questions on a daily basis in courtrooms adjudicating copyright and patent matters. In United States copyright law, for example, an intriguing dilemma regarding derivative works has developed that raises what appears to be a new issue regarding John Locke's sufficiency proviso.
The Role Of The Non-Functionality Requirement In Design Law,
2010
College of Management Academic Studies Law School, Israel
The Role Of The Non-Functionality Requirement In Design Law, Orit Fischman Afori
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The 2009 H1n1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Reconciling Goals Of Patents And Public Health Initiatives,
2010
Fordham University School of Law
The 2009 H1n1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Reconciling Goals Of Patents And Public Health Initiatives, Michelle Kaplan
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Bilski’S “Machine-Or-Transformation” Test: Uncertain Prognosis For Diagnostic Methods And Personalized Medicine Patents,
2010
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
Bilski’S “Machine-Or-Transformation” Test: Uncertain Prognosis For Diagnostic Methods And Personalized Medicine Patents, Brian P. Murphy, Daniel P. Murphy
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Draft Of Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso - 2010,
2010
Boston University School of Law
Draft Of Copyright's Derivative Works Doctrine And An Upside-Down Proviso - 2010, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
It is sometimes observed that questions of'justice in acquisition" do not much arise any more. However, judges face those questions on a daily basis in courtrooms adjudicating copyright and patent matters. In United States copyright law, for example, an intriguing dilemma regarding derivative works has developed that raises what appears to be a new issue regarding John Locke's sufficiency proviso.
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 28 - Deposition Of April Garvey (Marketing Consultant For Rosetta Stone),
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Ex. 28 - Deposition Of April Garvey (Marketing Consultant For Rosetta Stone), April Garvey
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Friending Privacy: Toward Self- Regulation Of Second Generation Social Networks ,
2010
Fordham University School of Law
Friending Privacy: Toward Self- Regulation Of Second Generation Social Networks , Robert Terenzi, Jr.
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
