Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Spaziano Declaration In Opposition To Google's Motion,
2010
Rosetta Stone
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Spaziano Declaration In Opposition To Google's Motion, Jennifer Spaziano
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 44 - Rosetta Stone's Opposition To Google's Motion For Summary Judgment,
2010
Santa Clara Law
Vol. Ix, Tab 44 - Rosetta Stone's Opposition To Google's Motion For Summary Judgment, Rosetta Stone
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xi, Tab 48 - Declaration Of Kris Brewer (Associate Discovery Counsel For Google),
2010
Google
Vol. Xi, Tab 48 - Declaration Of Kris Brewer (Associate Discovery Counsel For Google), Kris Brewer
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Declaration Of Henry Lien (Counsel For Google),
2010
Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 47 - Declaration Of Henry Lien (Counsel For Google), Henry Lien
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xii, Tab 49 - Declaration Of Thai Le In Support Of Google's Opposition To Partial Summary Judge As To Liability,
2010
Google
Vol. Xii, Tab 49 - Declaration Of Thai Le In Support Of Google's Opposition To Partial Summary Judge As To Liability, Thai Le
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Intellectual Property Law And Entertainment Law Issues,
2010
Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management
Intellectual Property Law And Entertainment Law Issues, Martin Kretschmer, W. Bruce Burch, John L. Turner, Bertis E. Downs Iv
Other Lectures and Presentations
The University of Georgia School of Law's Dean Rusk Center hosted an intellectual property law lecture featuring Martin Kretschmer, professor of information jurisprudence and director of the Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management at Bournemouth University, U.K. Kretschmer discussed his groundbreaking work in artist compensation in the European Union as well as the contractual structures that drive creative industries on April 6 at 1:30 p.m. in the Larry Walker Room of Dean Rusk Hall. His lecture was followed by comments from W. Bruce Burch, UGA director of Interdisciplinary Certificate in Music Business; Bertis E. Downs IV, Georgia Law adjunct …
Ipq; Spring 2010,
2010
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Intellectual Property Perspectives: Spring 2010,
2010
George Washington University
Intellectual Property Perspectives: Spring 2010, Ip Law Program
Intellectual Property Perspectives
No abstract provided.
2009 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
2009 Trademark Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Rebeccah Gan
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Meanwhile On The Other Side Of The Pond: Why Biopharmaceutical Inventions That Were "Obvious To Try" Still Might Be Non-Obvious --Part 1,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Meanwhile On The Other Side Of The Pond: Why Biopharmaceutical Inventions That Were "Obvious To Try" Still Might Be Non-Obvious --Part 1, Timo Minssen
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Vol. Ix, Tab 45 - Rosetta Stone's Opposition To Google's Motion For Summary Judgment,
2010
Santa Clara Law
Vol. Ix, Tab 45 - Rosetta Stone's Opposition To Google's Motion For Summary Judgment, Rosetta Stone
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Protecting Famous Trademarks: Comparative Analysis Of Us And Eu Diverging Approaches --The Battle Between Legislatures And The Judiciary. Who Is The Ultimate Judge?,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Protecting Famous Trademarks: Comparative Analysis Of Us And Eu Diverging Approaches --The Battle Between Legislatures And The Judiciary. Who Is The Ultimate Judge?, Stylianos Malliaris
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Panel Ii: The Global Contours Of Ip Protection For Trade Dress, Industrial Design, Applied Art, And Product Configuration,
2010
Boston University School of Law
Panel Ii: The Global Contours Of Ip Protection For Trade Dress, Industrial Design, Applied Art, And Product Configuration, Wendy J. Gordon, Orit Fischman Afori, Mark Janis, Susan Scafidi, Jonathan Moskin
Faculty Scholarship
Before beginning, let me mention that I will confine myself to a limited number of arenas. Thus, for example, I'm not going to discuss design patents, which will be the focus of another speaker's remarks. I will also not discuss the doctrine of aesthetic functionality. My primary goal will be to compare trademark's doctrine of utilitarian "functionality" with copyright's domain of "separability," and to show how for at least two circuit court opinions, the two doctrines may be converging. I hope to stimulate discussion of whether such convergence would be a good idea.
Always At The Margin: Inequitable Conduct In Flux,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Always At The Margin: Inequitable Conduct In Flux, Randall R. Radler
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
2009 Patent Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
2009 Patent Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Donald R. Dunner, Bryan C. Diner, Esther H. Lim, Troy E. Grabow, Tina E. Hulse, Joyce Craig
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dynamic Federalism And Patent Law Reform,
2010
SMU Dedman School of Law
Dynamic Federalism And Patent Law Reform, Xuan-Thao Nguyen
Indiana Law Journal
Patent law is federal law, and the normative approach to patent reform has been top down, looking to Congress and the Supreme Court for changes to the broken and complex patent system. The normative approach thus far has not yielded satisfactory results. This Article challenges the static approach to patent reform and embraces the dynamic-federalism approach that patent reform can be an overlapping of both national and local efforts. Patent reform at the local level is essential as locales can serve as laboratories for changes, vertically compete with national government to reform certain areas of the patent system, and become …
Proving Fair Use: Burden Of Proof As Burden Of Speech,
2010
University of South Carolina - Columbia
Proving Fair Use: Burden Of Proof As Burden Of Speech, Ned Snow
Faculty Publications
Courts have created a burden of proof in copyright that chills protected speech. The doctrine of fair use purports to ensure that copyright law does not trample rights of speakers whose expression employs copyrighted material. Yet those speakers face a burden of proof that weighs heavily in the fair use analysis, where factual inquiries are often subjective and speculative. Failure to satisfy the burden means severe penalties, which prospect quickly chills the free exercise of speech that constitutes a fair use. The fair-use burden of proof is repugnant to the fair use purpose. Today, copyright holders are exploiting the burden …
Doctrine Of The Dead: How Capcom V. Mkr Exposes The Decreasing Fit Between Modern Copyright Infringement Analysis And Modern Video Games,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Doctrine Of The Dead: How Capcom V. Mkr Exposes The Decreasing Fit Between Modern Copyright Infringement Analysis And Modern Video Games, Karlyn Ruth Meyer
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
What Is Neutral? Another Perspective To The Discussion Concerning Access Control,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
What Is Neutral? Another Perspective To The Discussion Concerning Access Control, Agustin Waisman
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Market Competition In Aid Of Humanitarian Concern: Reconsidering Pharmaceutical Drug Patents,
2010
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Market Competition In Aid Of Humanitarian Concern: Reconsidering Pharmaceutical Drug Patents, Michael Ilg
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
