Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Chinese Use Of Administrative Proceedings To Enforce Intellectual Property Rights: Evaluating And Improving Adr In China, Simeng Han

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Since its entry into the World Trade Organization ("WTO") in 2001, China has significantly reformed its legal system in order to enforce its commitment to protecting Intellectual Property ("IP"). Yet, there remains a lingering suspicion of the actual level of Chinese commitment-as indicated by continuous infringement claims from nations such as the United States. With an increasing number of disputes loading the court dockets and putting pressure on judges, and given China's "deep-rooted historical preference for informal and non-adversarial means of dispute resolution," there is enormous potential for further development of ADR in this field. Indeed, the culturally preferable way …

Red With Envy: Why The Fashion Industry Should Embrace Adr As A Viable Solution To Resolving Trademark Disputes, Erica S. Schwartz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note proposes that based on the nature of trademark disputes in the fashion industry, discussed in more detail below, alternative dispute resolution may be a viable option to resolve these cases. These alternative methods allow parties to explore mutually beneficial solutions, while avoiding litigation and ensuring the vitality of their brand. This Note also proposes that, based on previously successful programs used by other organizations, the Council of Fashion Designers of America should develop an alternative dispute resolution program to resolve disputes within the fashion industry.

Part II outlines the history of fashion design protection and examines the current …

Patent Attorney Malpractice: Case-Within-A-Case-Within-A-Case, Samuel Oddi

Akron Law Faculty Publications

As literary devices, a “story-within-a story” and a “play-within-a-play” have a long lineage. Shakespeare seems to have been particularly fond of these devices. The legal analog may be seen as the “case-within-a-case” (“trial-within-a-trial,” “suit-within-a-suit”) arising in legal malpractice cases. The case-within-a-case terminology seems to be the most commonly used and hence will be used herein. While it is clear that the “case” is the malpractice case, it is not so clear what the “case-within-” is, which is usually referred to as the “underlying case.” Often, it seems to be presumed that the underlying case is limited to litigation, which would …

A Look Back At Public Policy, The Legislature, The Courts And The Development Of Copyright Law In Singapore: Twenty-Five Years On, George S. S. Wei

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

The purpose of this article is to review the development of copyright law in Singapore over the past 25 years and to examine how public policy considerations have shaped legislative and judicial development of copyright law principles. The article begins with a review of legislative activity and includes a brief survey of the public consultation exercises that have taken place on reform proposals. Included is a discussion of statutory amendments in respect of exhaustion of rights and fair dealing. This is followed by a discussion of some copyright case law, with a view to identifying judicial copyright policy approaches and …

Is Pepsi Really A Substitute For Coke? Market Definition In Antitrust And Ip, Mark P. Mckenna

Journal Articles

Antitrust law explicitly depends on market definition. Many issues in IP law also depend on market definition, though that definition is rarely explicit. Applying antitrust traditional market definition to IP goods leads to some startling results. Despite the received wisdom that IP rights don't necessarily confer market power, a wide array of IP rights do exactly that under traditional antitrust principles. This result requires us to rethink both the overly-rigid way we define markets in antitrust law and the competitive consequences of granting IP protection. Both antitrust and IP must begin to think realistically about those consequences, rather than falling …

Dastar's Next Stand, Mark P. Mckenna

Journal Articles

A series of recent cases implicate the extent to which trademark law can be used to control creative content. The possibility of using trademark law for that purpose obviously creates a potential conflict with copyright law, which ordinarily sets the rules for use of creative material developed by others. Unfortunately, despite its attraction to boundary questions in trademark law, the Supreme Court‘s Dastar decision—its lone decision demarcating trademark and copyright law—remains controversial and its scope somewhat unclear. This Essay argues that Dastar should be understood, or at least should be extended, to rule out any claims based on confusion that …

(Dys)Functionality, Mark P. Mckenna

Journal Articles

The functionality doctrine serves a unique role in trademark law: unlike virtually every other doctrine, functionality can trump consumer confusion (or so it seems, at least in mechanical-functionality cases). In this sense, functionality may be the only doctrine in trademark law that can truly be considered a defense. But despite its potential power, the functionality doctrine is quite inconsistently applied. This is true of mechanical functionality cases because courts differ over the extent to which the doctrine focuses on competitors’ right to copy unpatented features as opposed to their need to copy. And aesthetic functionality cases are even more scattered: …

The Normativity Of Copying In Copyright Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh

Faculty Scholarship

Not all copying constitutes copyright infringement. Quite independent of fair use, copyright law requires that an act of copying be qualitatively and quantitatively significant enough – or “substantially similar” – for it to be actionable. Originating in the nineteenth century, and entirely the creation of courts, copyright’s requirement of “substantial similarity” has thus far received little attention as an independently meaningful normative dimension of the copyright entitlement. This Article offers a novel theory for copyright’s substantial-similarity requirement by placing it firmly at the center of the institution and its various goals and purposes. As a common-law-style device that mirrors the …

Modifying Rand Commitments To Better Price Patents In The Standards Setting Context, Kyle Rozema

Scholarship@WashULaw

This Article addresses a single problem: how can we allow engineers and scientists from different institutions to collaborate to set the best technical standards possible, not considering intellectual property (“IP”) rights, and then establish the royalty rates for each patent owner after the standard is set? The current system attempting to solve this problem requires patent owner participants to sign a Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (“RAND”) commitment. These RAND commitments require the participants to agree an ante, i.e., before the standard is actually set, to license whatever patent rights they may ultimately have in the standard on terms that are reasonable …

A Note On India’S Attempt To Reconcile Diversity And Intellectual Property Issues, Srividhya Ragavan

Faculty Scholarship

For developing countries, the concept of diversity holds great promises not least because of the protection it promises for the fast depleting natural resources leading to catastrophic effect on the environment. The concept of diversity also holds great promises from a trade perspective. In reality, appropriate protection of diversity can be the solution to balance the effects of the trade regime to achieve sustainable development. The term sustainable development, as opposed to rapid pockets of development, embodies great promises for the socio-political framework in poorer nations, apart from the obvious benefit of sustainability. In fact, sustainable development, if it ensues, …

Is Wikileaks A Hit Man Handbook: Why Wikileaks Cannot Claim First Amendment Immunity If The Afghan And Iraq War Logs Cause Physical Harm, Rachel Wolbers

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Mass File Sharing Lawsuits: Legalized Extortion Or Valid Defense Of Copyright, Tyler Tassone

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Drone Strikes On Citizens: Ensuring Due Process For U.S. Citizens Suspected Of Terrorism Abroad, Casey Fitzpatrick

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Parol Metadata: New Biolerplate Merger Clauses And The Admissibility Of Metadata Under The Parol Evidence Rule, Thomas H. White

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

United States V. Jones: Reviving The Property Foundation Of The Fourth Amendment, Herbert W. Titus, William J. Olson

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Autonomous Cars And Tort Liability: Why The Market Will "Drive" Autonomous Cars Out Of The Marketplace, Kyle Colonna

Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet

No abstract provided.

Copyright Policymaking As Procedural Democratic Process: A Discourse-Theoretic Perspective On Acta, Sopa, And Pipa, Annemarie Bridy

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Region Codes And Human Rights, Molly Land

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Consumer Decision-Making Theory Of Trademark Law, Mark P. Mckenna

Journal Articles

The consumer search costs theory has dominated discussion of trademark law for the last several decades. According to this theory, trademark law aims to increase consumer welfare by reducing the cost of shopping for goods or services, and it accomplishes this goal by preventing uses of a trademark that might confuse consumers about the source of the goods with which the mark is used. This conceptual frame is wrong, and it is complicit in most of trademark law’s extraordinary expansion. “Search costs” is not sufficiently precise; many types of search costs are irrelevant to consumer behavior, and even when search …

Revisiting Single Color Trademarks In Fashion After Louboutin, Danielle E. Gorman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.