Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Personalized Medicine, Genetic Exceptionalism, And The Rule Of Law: An Analysis Of The Prevailing Justification For Invalidating Brca1/2 Patents In Association Of Molecular Pathology V. Uspto, Kristen L. Burge

Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts

As medicine advances toward a more personalized model, the significance of genetic information is growing exponentially. While unlocking the genetic code has advanced the state of medicine, it has also reinvigorated the debate over the boundaries of patentable subject matter. The potential clash between having access to state-of-the-art medicine and protecting intellectual property investments came to a head in the case, Association of Molecular Pathology v. USPTO (“Myriad”). This Article analyzes the legal opinion rendered by the district court through the unique lens of genetic exceptionalism—a concept previously reserved to social science and public policy. Then, this Article …

Of Smart Phone Wars And Software Patents, Stuart Graham, Saurabh Vishnubhakat

Faculty Scholarship

Among the main criticisms currently confronting the US Patent and Trademark Office are concerns about software patents and what role they play in the web of litigation now proceeding in the smart phone industry. We will examine the evidence on the litigation and the treatment by the Patent Office of patents that include software elements. We present specific empirical evidence regarding the examination by the Patent Office of software patents, their validity, and their role in the smart phone wars. More broadly, this article discusses the competing values at work in the patent system and how the system has dealt …

The Presumption Of Patentability, Sean B. Seymore

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

When the Framers of the United States Constitution granted Congress the authority to create a patent system, they certainty did not envision a patent as an a priori entitlement. As it stands now, anyone who files a patent application on anything is entitled to a presumption of patentability. A patent examiner who seeks to challenge patentability faces the dual burden of building a prima facie case of unpatentability and carrying the ultimate burden of proof. Thus, from the outset, an applicant is in a very good position; but the examiner’s limited resources, time pressures, and production goals tip the scales …

Rohauer Revisited: "Rear Window," Copyright Reversions, Renewals, Terminations, Derivative Works And Fair Use , Richard Colby

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright And The First Amendment: Freedom Or Monopoly Of Expression?, Henry S. Hoberman

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sufficiently Supervised Commissioned Workers: Mythical Beasts Sculpted From Old Law, Alexander Lambrous

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

States Escape Liability For Copyright Infringement?, Michelle V. Francis

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Masck V. Sports Illustrated, United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

A Descendible Right Of Publicity: Has The Time Finally Come For A National Standard?, J. Steven Bingman

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Has Delaware Become The "New" Eastern District Of Texas? The Unforeseen Consequences Of The Aia, Fabio E. Marino, Teri H.P. Nguyen

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

To stem the rising tide of patent suits brought by non-practicing entities (NPEs), Congress enacted the anti-joinder provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) while, at nearly the same time, the Federal Circuit issued a series of decisions making it easier for defendants to transfer multi-defendant cases filed by NPEs away from the Eastern District of Texas. The unexpected result of these initiatives, however, has been that NPEs have selected the District of Delaware as their new “forum of choice,” making it the most popular forum for patent litigation in the country and displacing the Eastern District of Texas.

Copyright's Hand Abstractions Test For Patent's Section 101 Subject-Matter Eligibility, Mark R. Carter

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

Since the Federal Circuit’s 2007 In re Bilski decision and the Supreme Court’s 2008 Bilski v. Kappos decision, patent law’s subject-matter eligibility standard under 35 U.S.C. §101 has been uncertain. This paper posits patent law’s patent-ineligible abstract ideas are science concepts and science laws, composed of science concepts, as defined by science philosophers. Somewhat analogous to copyright law, it also presents a downward patent-eligibility Hand abstractions test from an alleged abstract idea, natural law, or natural phenomenon to independent claims as a coherent, systematic, and practical approach to judging utility-patent eligibility. Patent claims manifest an innate vertical abstractions ladder, so …

Intellectual Capital Disclosure And The Ipo Prospectus: An Exploratory Study, Keith Harman

Faculty Publications and Presentations

ICD (Intellectual Capital Disclosure) was studied via content analysis of IPO (Initial Public Offering) filings by retailers versus software companies. Data were obtained from 106 firms’ SEC S-1 filings between 2001 and 2011. Key findings were: (1) ICD increased over time, (2) significant differences in the type of IC disclosed, (3) Structural Capital was the type of IC most frequently disclosed, (4) consistency among firms regarding the frequency with which specific IC components (e.g. brands) were disclosed, and (5) no significant difference in ICD when comparing retailers and software companies.

Why International Inventors Might Want To Consider Filing Their First Patent Application At The United States Patent Office & The Convergence Of Patent Harmonization And E-Commerce, Michael H. Anderson, Daniel Cislo, Jaime Saavedra, Kimberly Cameron

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

On March 16, 2013, the United States implemented the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). Enactment of the AIA substantially enhances the value of U.S. provisional and non-provisional patent applications (PPAs and NPAs) to foreign applicants. Here, the authors endeavor to outline the procedural and strategic considerations facing foreign applicants for PPAs by offering a brief survey of protective foreign patent application law, followed by an analysis of the modern benefits of PPA filing in the post-AIA world. The analysis here suggests that the traditional benefits to foreign filers of PPAs encompassing term extension, cost-efficiency and secrecy have been amplified by …

In Privity With The Public Domain: The Standing Doctrine, The Public Interest, And Intellectual Property, Russell W. Jacobs

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

This Article explores two recent Supreme Court cases—Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. and Golan v. Holder—and other intellectual property litigation in the context of the standing doctrine and the public interest.

These cases present significant public policy questions, but the adversarial nature of the courts makes them ill-equipped to consider the multiple public interests and multiple stakeholder perspectives. As a result, adjudication of these cases in the courts results in propertization of the intellectual property interests, the exclusion of non-parties from the formation of policy, and the exhaustion of any further policy debate after the court decision. …

A Witness Against Himself: A Case For Stronger Legal Protection Of Encryption, Benjamin Folkinshteyn

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

This Article examines the application of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to compelled disclosure of unencrypted data. Such disclosure can include provision of passwords to access encrypted data as well as, increasingly, providing unencrypted data after compelled decryption.

The pervasiveness and persistence of electronic data drastically increases the availability of information with potential evidentiary value that has not previously existed with physical evidence. The courts have struggled with finding the appropriate balance in determining the scope and applicability of the privilege against self-incrimination to electronic evidence. The lack of precise physical world analogues to encryption has led to particular …

Graduated Response American Style: “Six Strikes” Measured Against Five Norms, Annemarie Bridy

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

In 2008, in recognition of the DMCA’s inadequacy in the face of P2P file sharing, and with the high-profile case of Arista Records v. Lime Group pending in federal district court in New York, then New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began pressuring broadband providers to agree voluntarily to play a greater role in fighting online infringement. Subsequently, the Obama administration, represented nationally by the Office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC) and internationally by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), expressly endorsed the concept of privately negotiated anti-piracy collaborations between corporate rights owners and …

Toward A Limited Right Of Publicity: An Argument For The Convergence Of The Right Of Publicity, Unfair Competition And Trademark Law, Andrew Beckerman-Rodau

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The right of publicity — the most recently developed type of intellectual property — allows a person to control commercial use of his or her identity. The scope of the right has expanded significantly since its inception because many courts and commentators have misinterpreted it, viewing it as a pure property right justified by a labor or unjust enrichment theory. Rather, this article contends that it should be evaluated in light of the utilitarian justification for intellectual property law. Rewarding people by allowing them to monetize their public persona is not the goal of the right of publicity. The goal …

Evolution Or Mutation?: The Elimination Of High Mark Similarity Standards In Federal Dilution Law, Matthew A. Karmel

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Who Owns Your Body Art?: The Copyright And Constitutional Implications Of Tattoos, Meredith Hatic

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Red Card: Using The National Football League’S “Rooney Rule” To Eject Race Discrimination From English Professional Soccer’S Managerial And Executive Hiring Practices, Jeremy Corapi

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.