Deepfake Videos: When Seeing Isn't Believing,
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Deepfake Videos: When Seeing Isn't Believing, Holly Kathleen Hall
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
Videos, known as deepfakes, use readily available software to create a work that shows people saying and doing things they may never have uttered or engaged in. The technology making the videos appear very authentic is advancing at such a rate that people may not be able to detect if the videos are fact or fiction. Given the hasty acceptance of other forms of fake news in society, deepfake videos have the ability to affect the nature of information the public receives about candidates and policies. This study examines the potential use of deepfake videos in the democratic process, analyzes …
Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions,
Texas A&M University School of Law
Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, Jorge Contreras, Peter Yu
Faculty Scholarship
When adjudicating high-value cases involving the licensing of patents covering industry standards such as Wi-Fi and 5G (standards-essential patents or SEPs), courts around the world have increasingly issued injunctions preventing one party from pursuing parallel litigation in another jurisdiction (anti-suit injunctions or ASIs). In response, courts in other jurisdictions have begun to issue anti-anti-suit injunctions, or even anti-anti-anti suit injunctions, to prevent parties from hindering the proceedings in those courts. Most of these activities have been limited to the United States and Europe, but in 2020 China emerged as a powerful new source of ASIs in global SEP litigation. The …
The Triumph Of Three Big Ideas In Fair Use Jurisprudence,
American University Washington College of Law
The Triumph Of Three Big Ideas In Fair Use Jurisprudence, Peter Jaszi, Michael Carroll, Michael Carroll
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
In two recent cases, Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (“Google v. Oracle”), and Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith (“Warhol”), the Supreme Court ratified its 1994 holding that transformative use is the appropriate analytical framework for applying copyright law’s fair use provision. In doing so, the Court withstood significant pressure from industry participants in these cases to change course. This Article argues that the Court’s decisions, which represent one third of the Court’s total merits decisions on fair use, are historic. The principal contribution this Article makes is to demonstrate to courts and parties in future …
The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory Of Organised Social Media Manipulation,
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory Of Organised Social Media Manipulation
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
Executive Summary
Over the past three years, we have monitored the global organization of social media manipulation by governments and political parties. Our 2019 report analyses the trends of computational propaganda and the evolving tools, capacities, strategies, and resources.
1. Evidence of organized social media manipulation campaigns which have taken place in 70 countries, up from 48 countries in 2018 and 28 countries in 2017. In each country, there is at least one political party or government agency using social media to shape public attitudes domestically.
2.Social media has become co-opted by many authoritarian regimes. In 26 countries, computational propaganda …
The Supreme People's Court Annual Report On Intellectual Property Cases (2017) (China),
University of Washington School of Law
The Supreme People's Court Annual Report On Intellectual Property Cases (2017) (China)
Washington International Law Journal
The Supreme People’s Court of China began publishing its Annual Report on Intellectual Property Cases in 2008. The Annual Report summarizes intellectual property cases, such as patent, trademark, trade secrets, copyright, and unfair competition cases. This 2017 Annual Report examines 42 cases and includes general guidelines for legal application. This summary reflects the Supreme People’s Court’s thoughts and approaches for ruling on new and complex IP and competition cases.
Nil Collectives And The Disadvantage Dilemma: Disparities And Challenges In Collegiate Athletics,
Florida International University College of Law
Nil Collectives And The Disadvantage Dilemma: Disparities And Challenges In Collegiate Athletics, Arianna Garcia
FIU Law Review
For a long time, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)’s principle of amateurism, the concept that student-athletes should not profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL) while competing in collegiate athletics, was strongly upheld. However, it quickly became a challenge for the NCAA to defend its principle of amateurism after thousands of advocates, including universities and student-athletes themselves, began to criticize the NCAA. Finally, after decades of fighting for more equitable rights for student-athletes, the NCAA made a change to its NIL Policy as a result of two major landmark cases. The NCAA, however, now faces another challenge amidst …
Play Like A Girl, Get Paid Like A… Man?,
University of New Hampshire
Play Like A Girl, Get Paid Like A… Man?, Amanda Malool
UNH Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property Harms: A Paradigm For The Twenty-First Century,
Boston University School of Law
Intellectual Property Harms: A Paradigm For The Twenty-First Century, Jessica Silbey
Faculty Scholarship
This short essay is part of a larger book project that investigates how contemporary intellectual property debates, especially in the digital age, are taking place over less familiar terrain: fundamental rights and values. Its argument draws from the diverse, personal accounts of interviews from everyday creators and innovators and focuses on descriptions of harms and, as some say “abuses,” they suffer within their practicing communities. The harms are not described are the usual harms that intellectual property law is understood to prevent. Typically, intellectual property injuries are conceived in individual terms and as economic injuries. An infringer is a thief. …
Ai-Generated Fashion Designs: Who Or What Owns The Goods?,
Fordham Law School
Ai-Generated Fashion Designs: Who Or What Owns The Goods?, Caen Dennis
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
As artificial intelligence (“AI”) becomes an increasingly prevalent tool in a plethora of industries in today’s society, analyzing the potential legal implications attached to AI-generated works is becoming more popular. One of the industries impacted by AI is fashion. AI tools and devices are currently being used in the fashion industry to create fashion models, fabric designs, and clothing. An AI device’s ability to generate fashion designs raises the question of who will own the copyrights of the fashion designs. Will it be the fashion designer who hires or contracts with the AI device programmer? Will it be the programmer? …
Prostitution Policy: Legalization, Decriminalization And The Nordic Model,
Seattle University School of Law
Prostitution Policy: Legalization, Decriminalization And The Nordic Model
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
