Engaging First Year Students With Intellectual Property,
2020
West Virginia University
Engaging First Year Students With Intellectual Property, Marian G. Armour-Gemmen
Faculty & Staff Scholarship
Since intellectual property is so important to engineers, creating enthusiasm from the beginning of their engineering studies is imperative. Since first year students have not learned how to apply technological concepts to real life, demonstrating intellectual property could be a challenge. To engage first year engineering students in the concept and the value of intellectual property, students were introduced to basic concepts and applications. Different concepts were applied to real life examples allowing them to interface with technology from an intellectual property perspective. This paper highlights not only patents, but also trademarks and trade secrets.
Enemy Of The People: The Ghost Of The F.C.C. Fairness Doctrine In The Age Of Alternative Facts,
2020
Texas A&M University School of Law
Enemy Of The People: The Ghost Of The F.C.C. Fairness Doctrine In The Age Of Alternative Facts, Ian Klein
Student Scholarship
The FCC Fairness Doctrine required that all major broadcasting outlets spend equal time covering both sides of all controversial issues of national importance. The Fairness Doctrine remained the standard for decades before it stopped being enforced during the Reagan administration, and was removed from the Federal Register during the Obama administration. Since the Fairness Doctrine’s disappearance, the perception by conservatives and progressives alike has been that major media outlets display overt biases towards one political affiliation or the other. As it becomes harder to determine real news from “fake news,” Americans’ trust in media is at an all-time low. An …
Public Rights After Oil States Energy,
2020
Faulkner University, Thomas Goode Jones School of Law
Public Rights After Oil States Energy, Adam J. Macleod
Notre Dame Law Review
The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. But as the decision in Oil States last Term revealed, the Court has often used the term to refer to three different concepts with different jurisprudential implications. Using insights drawn from historical and analytical jurisprudence, this Article distinguishes the three concepts and examines how each of them is at work in patent law. A precise reading of Oil States also bears lessons for other areas of law that implicate both private rights and duties and the administration of public, regulatory …
The Supreme Court Bar At The Bar Of Patents,
2020
Boston University School of Law
The Supreme Court Bar At The Bar Of Patents, Paul R. Gugliuzza
Notre Dame Law Review
Over the past two decades, a few dozen lawyers have come to dominate practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. By many accounts, these elite lawyers—whose clients are often among the largest corporations in the world—have spurred the Court to hear more cases that businesses care about and to decide those cases in favor of their clients. The Supreme Court’s recent caselaw on antitrust, arbitration, punitive damages, class actions, and more provides copious examples.
Though it is often overlooked in discussions of the emergent Supreme Court bar, patent law is another area in which the Court’s agenda has changed significantly in …
Comments On Preliminary Draft 5 [Black Letter And Comments],
2020
Columbia Law School
Comments On Preliminary Draft 5 [Black Letter And Comments], Jane C. Ginsburg, June M. Besek
Faculty Scholarship
We appreciate the considerable work that has gone into PD5, and believe that several of its provisions and Comments accurately quote or state and explain the law. Nonetheless, PD5 manifests several of the earlier drafts’ shortcomings. We remain particularly concerned that the relationship of this draft to the statute remains highly inconsistent, not to say erratic. We are not sanguine that our oft-repeated calls that the Reporters and ALI devise a consistent and transparent methodology for restating a statute will finally be heeded. (To the extent there is a guiding principle behind this Restatement, and PD5, it often appears to …
Cultural Ip Vs. Commercial Ip,
2020
University of Miami School of Law
Fair Use In Oracle: Proximate Cause At The Copyright/Patent Divide,
2020
Boston University School of Law
Fair Use In Oracle: Proximate Cause At The Copyright/Patent Divide, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
In Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC, the Federal Circuit undermined copyright law’s deference to patent law and, in doing so, delivered a blow to both regimes. Copyright’s deference— including a historic refusal to enforce rights that might undermine the public’s liberty to copy unpatented inventions-- is a necessary part of preserving inventors’ willingness to accept the short duration, mandatory disclosure, and other stringent bargains demanded by patent law. Deference to patent law is also integral to copyright law’s interior architecture; copyright’s refusal to monopolize functional applications of creative work lowers the social costs that would otherwise be imposed by …
The Cost Of Novelty,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
The Cost Of Novelty, Will Nicholson Price Ii
Articles
Patent law tries to spur the development of new and better innovative technology. But it focuses much more on “new” than “better”—and it turns out that “new” carries real social costs. I argue that patent law promotes innovation that diverges from existing technology, either a little (what I call “differentiating innovation”) or a lot (“exploring innovation”), at the expense of innovation that tells us more about existing technology (“deepening innovation”). Patent law’s focus on newness is unsurprising, and fits within a well-told narrative of innovative diversity accompanied by market selection of the best technologies. Unfortunately, innovative diversity brings not only …
Can Algorithms Promote Fair Use?,
2020
Texas A&M University School of Law
Can Algorithms Promote Fair Use?, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
In the past few years, advances in big data, machine learning and artificial intelligence have generated many questions in the intellectual property field. One question that has attracted growing attention concerns whether algorithms can be better deployed to promote fair use in copyright law. The debate on the feasibility of developing automated fair use systems is not new; it can be traced back to more than a decade ago. Nevertheless, recent technological advances have invited policymakers and commentators to revisit this earlier debate.
As part of the Symposium on "Intelligent Entertainment: Algorithmic Generation and Regulation of Creative Works," this Article …
Patenting New Uses For Old Inventions,
2020
Vanderbilt University Law School
Patenting New Uses For Old Inventions, Sean B. Seymore
Vanderbilt Law Review
A bedrock principle of patent law is that old inventions cannot be patented. And a new use for an old invention does not render the old invention patentable. This is because patent law requires novelty—an invention must be new. But while a new use for an old invention does not make the old invention patentable, the new use itself might be patentable. In fact, new-use patents comprise a significant part of the patent landscape—particularly in pharmaceuticals, when drug companies obtain new-use patents to repurpose old drugs. This trend has fueled debates over follow-on innovation and patent quality. But there is …
“Catchy Phrases That Convey A Message”: The Danger Of Tam’S Copymark Creep And Trademark Law’S New First Amendment Analysis,
2020
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
“Catchy Phrases That Convey A Message”: The Danger Of Tam’S Copymark Creep And Trademark Law’S New First Amendment Analysis, Stacey M. Lantagne
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Conspiracy Theory Handbook,
2020
University of Bristol
The Conspiracy Theory Handbook, Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook
Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.
Conspiracy theories attempt to explain events as the secretive plots of powerful people. While conspiracy theories are not typically supported by evidence, this doesn’t stop them from blossoming. Conspiracy theories damage society in a number of ways. To help minimize these harmful effects, The Conspiracy Theory Handbook, by Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook, explains why conspiracy theories are so popular, how to identify the traits of conspiratorial thinking, and what are effective response strategies.
The Handbook distills the most important research findings and expert advice on dealing with conspiracy theories. It also introduces the abbreviation CONSPIR which serves as a …
Patent Shopping,
2020
Boston University School of Law
Patent Shopping, Janet Freilich
Faculty Scholarship
Over the past decade, scholars have identified many entities who use the patent system in ways that differ from the traditional model of patent use — entities such as patent assertion entities, patent aggregators, or owners of large patent portfolios. This Article presents a model that explains the behavior of some of the biggest and most controversial entities in the patent system. This Article argues that such entities are engaged in “patent shopping” where the plaintiff makes a strategic choice of patent in order to obtain the best facts and substance in a case and thereby maximize the chance of …
Casting Light On The Shade: Using Securities Laws To Draw New Contours In Art Investment Regulation,
2020
Fordham University School of Law
Casting Light On The Shade: Using Securities Laws To Draw New Contours In Art Investment Regulation, Emma Snover
Fordham Law Review
The disparate treatment of art investments under the Internal Revenue Code and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 poses a problem. This disparity generates inequities among art investors and between art investors and investors in traditional securities markets. The Internal Revenue Code considers both art and traditional securities to be capital assets with no material distinction. For example, prior to the 2017 tax act, art investors could defer the realization of capital gains through like-kind exchanges of works of art under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Currently, under section 1400Z-2, an addition to the Internal Revenue Code through …
Patent Eligibility Of Disease Diagnosis,
2020
New York Law School
Patent Eligibility Of Disease Diagnosis, Shahrokh Falati
Articles & Chapters
The U.S. Supreme Court effectively redefined the scope of patent eligible subject matter when it decided Mayo. This decision focused on medical diagnostic technology and has had a profound effect on the biotechnology and personalized medicine industries in the United States. Subsequent back-to-back decisions by the Supreme Court in Myriad and Alice have made it unequivocally clear that there is now wholesale broadening of the judicially created exceptions to statutory laws governing patent eligible subject matter. This has caused havoc in the biopharmaceutical industry by not only making it a near impossibility to obtain a patent in certain fields, but …
Automation In Moderation,
2020
Texas A&M University School of Law
Automation In Moderation, Hannah Bloch-Wehba
Faculty Scholarship
This Article assesses recent efforts to encourage online platforms to use automated means to prevent the dissemination of unlawful online content before it is ever seen or distributed. As lawmakers in Europe and around the world closely scrutinize platforms’ “content moderation” practices, automation and artificial intelligence appear increasingly attractive options for ridding the Internet of many kinds of harmful online content, including defamation, copyright infringement, and terrorist speech. Proponents of these initiatives suggest that requiring platforms to screen user content using automation will promote healthier online discourse and will aid efforts to limit Big Tech’s power.
In fact, however, the …
Asian Ip Law: An Area Of Rising Importance,
2020
Singapore Management University
Asian Ip Law: An Area Of Rising Importance, Kung-Chung Liu, Shufeng Zheng
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Intellectual property (IP) laws are an important instrument for promoting cooperation and peace in Asia. In their own ways, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, China and India all serve as IP success stories. Structural features of the IP landscape in major Asian jurisdictions include the following: technocrat-driven IP law, national IP strategies and specialized IP or patent judges. In addition, there are five distinctively Asian developments worth noticing: the sweeping criminalization of copyright infringement, an explosion in the number of registered trademarks, the very limited use of compulsory patent licensing and the convergence on certain standards for the licensing …
The Ip Of Ipas,
2020
University of Georgia School of Law
The Ip Of Ipas, Stephen Wolfson, Brian Roth, Chase Scott, Dustin Watts, Charles Hicks, Shivani Patel
Other Colloquium, Conferences, and Symposia
Hosted by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law, this panel brought Brian Roth (Southern Brewing Co.), Chase Scott (Taylor, Feil, Harper & Lumsden, P.C.), and Dustin Watts (Terrapin Beer Co.) together with Stephen Wolfson (Research & Copyright Services Librarian, UGA Law School) and students from the Journal of Intellectual Property Law to discuss how breweries are navigating intellectual property issues. Free koozies to commemorate the event were distributed.
Defending Local Working,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Defending Local Working, Melat Arega
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Cybersecurity And Patent Law - Let's Work Together,
2020
American University Washington College of Law
Cybersecurity And Patent Law - Let's Work Together, Vignesh Ramachandran
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
