Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World,
2011
Georgetown Law Center
Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World, Victoria Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Some constitutional tragedies are well known: Plessy v. Ferguson and Korematsu v. United States are taught to every first-year law student. Buck v. Bell is not. Decided in 1927 by the Taft Court, the case is known for its shocking remedy--sterilization--and Justice Holmes's dramatic rhetoric: "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." A mere five paragraphs long, Buck v. Bell could represent the highest ratio of injustice per word ever signed on to by eight Supreme Court Justices, progressive and conservative alike.
Buck v. Bell is not a tragedy as some others might define tragedy: it is not a well-known opinion, …
Reaction To: Wealth, Poverty, And The Equal Protection Clause,
2011
Florida A & M University College of Law
Reaction To: Wealth, Poverty, And The Equal Protection Clause, Patricia A. Broussard
Journal Publications
No abstract provided.
Involuntary Servitude, Public Accommodations Laws, And The Legacy Of Heart Of Atlanta Motel, Inc. V. United States,
2011
Boston University School of Law
Involuntary Servitude, Public Accommodations Laws, And The Legacy Of Heart Of Atlanta Motel, Inc. V. United States, Linda C. Mcclain
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium - The Maryland Constitutional Law Schmooze - Foreword: Plus Or Minus One: The Thirteenth And Fourteenth Amendments,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Symposium - The Maryland Constitutional Law Schmooze - Foreword: Plus Or Minus One: The Thirteenth And Fourteenth Amendments, Mark A. Graber
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congressional Authority To Interpret The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Congressional Authority To Interpret The Thirteenth Amendment, Alexander Tsesis
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congressional Authority To Interpret The Thirteenth Amendment: A Response To Professor Tsesis,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Congressional Authority To Interpret The Thirteenth Amendment: A Response To Professor Tsesis, Jennifer Mason Mcaward
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment, Michael Les Benedict
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Beyond Originalism: Conservative Declarationism And Constitutional Redemption,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Beyond Originalism: Conservative Declarationism And Constitutional Redemption, Ken I. Kersch
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporate Prerogative, Race, And Identity Under The Fourteenth Amendment,
2011
Ohio State University
Corporate Prerogative, Race, And Identity Under The Fourteenth Amendment, John A. Powell, Caitlin Watt
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 5 Constraints On Congress Through The Lens Of Article Iii And The Constitutionality Of The Employment Non-Discrimination Act,
2011
University of Colorado Law School
Section 5 Constraints On Congress Through The Lens Of Article Iii And The Constitutionality Of The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, Craig Konnoth
Publications
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) that will (hopefully) soon prohibit discrimination against LGB, and ideally, T, individuals, allows state employees to sue states for this discrimination. Scholars and activists fear that these provisions will be struck down as violative of state sovereign immunity, using the Court's recent jurisprudence on Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. This jurisprudence requires Congress to put forth evidence of past state violations of a defined constitutional right before it can subject states to suit. This Congress has done.
However, this Comment suggests that a new requirement of Section 5 legislation is in the works. Key …
The Constitutionality Of And Need For Retroactive Civil Legislation Relating To Child Sexual Abuse,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Constitutionality Of And Need For Retroactive Civil Legislation Relating To Child Sexual Abuse, Jenna Miller
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note advocates for the constitutionality and necessity of retroactive child sexual abuse laws, arguing that they provide victims with a pathway to justice despite statutes of limitations. It supports this stance with Supreme Court rulings and examples of successful implementations in states like California and Delaware, emphasizing the balance between victims' rights and defendants' rights.
Guarding Their Sanctuary On The Offense: Criminal Contempt Actions By Domestic Violence Victims In Private Capacity,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Guarding Their Sanctuary On The Offense: Criminal Contempt Actions By Domestic Violence Victims In Private Capacity, Mili Patel
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Gender-Classified Imports: Equal Protection Violations In The Harmonized Tariff Schedule Of The United States,
2011
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Gender-Classified Imports: Equal Protection Violations In The Harmonized Tariff Schedule Of The United States, Jason Lewis
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that gender-based classifications in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) likely violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It critiques the Federal Circuit's application of a lower level of scrutiny in Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United States and advocates for courts to apply intermediate scrutiny, as established by Craig v. Boren, to such classifications. The analysis also examines the role of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in trade negotiations and asserts that international agreements cannot override constitutional protections.
The Origins Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Part Ii: John Bingham And The Second Draft Of The Fourteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Richmond
The Origins Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Part Ii: John Bingham And The Second Draft Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Kurt T. Lash
Law Faculty Publications
Historical accounts of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment generally assume that John Bingham based the text on Article IV of the original Constitution and that Bingham, like other Reconstruction Republicans, viewed Justice Washington’s opinion in Corfield v. Coryell as the definitive interpretation of Article IV. According to this view, Justice Miller in the Slaughterhouse Cases failed to follow both framers’ intent and obvious textual meaning when he sharply distinguished Section One’s privileges or immunities from Article IV’s privileges and immunities.
This article, the second in an extended investigation of the origins of the …
Regulating Morality Through The Common Law And Exclusionary Zoning,
2011
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Regulating Morality Through The Common Law And Exclusionary Zoning, George P. Smith Ii, Gregory P. Bailey
Scholarly Articles
The extent to which a free society seeks to regulate sexual expression is problematic. What was defined as immoral or contra bonos mores in the 20th century, has become less of an issue in today’s liberal society. Freedom of sexual intimacy and expression are, to be sure, 1st Amendment and 14th Amendment rights. But, with every assertion of a fundamental right or liberty must come a concomitant understanding that there is a co-ordinate responsibility to exercise that right reasonably. Determining the reasonableness of any conduct grounded in these two amendments must be fact sensitive and guided by community standards. Broad, …
The Four Pillars Of Constitutional Doctrine,
2011
Vanderbilt University
The Four Pillars Of Constitutional Doctrine, Suzanna Sherry
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
When The Evil Day Comes, Will Title Vii's Disparate Impact Provision Be Narrowly Tailored To Survive An Equal Protection Clause Challenge,
2011
University of Oklahoma College of Law
When The Evil Day Comes, Will Title Vii's Disparate Impact Provision Be Narrowly Tailored To Survive An Equal Protection Clause Challenge, Eang Ngov
Faculty Articles
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions." Employers must be careful about the intentional and unintentional effect of their employment practices, even when acting with good motive. Title VII’s disparate impact provision holds employers liable for employment practices that cause an adverse impact on racial groups, even when the employment practice applies equally to all groups and was not implemented to disadvantage a particular group. A prima facie case of disparate impact can arise solely based on numbers - a comparison between the rate at which one racial group passes a test or is selected for hiring or …
The Constitutional Right Not To Participate In Abortions: Roe, Casey, And The Fourteenth Amendment Rights Of Healthcare Providers,
2011
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
The Constitutional Right Not To Participate In Abortions: Roe, Casey, And The Fourteenth Amendment Rights Of Healthcare Providers, Mark L. Rienzi
Scholarly Articles
The Fourteenth Amendment rights of various parties in the abortion context – the pregnant woman, the fetus, the fetus’ father, the state – have been discussed at length by commentators and the courts. Surprisingly, the Fourteenth Amendment rights of the healthcare provider asked to provide the abortion have not. Roe and Casey establish a pregnant woman’s Fourteenth Amendment right to decide for herself whether to have an abortion. Do those same precedents also protect her doctor’s right to decide whether to participate in abortion procedures?
The Court’s substantive due process analysis typically looks for rights that are “deeply rooted” in …
Privileges Or Immunities,
2011
Columbia Law School
Privileges Or Immunities, Philip A. Hamburger
Faculty Scholarship
What was meant by the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause? Did it incorporate the U.S. Bill of Rights against the states or did it do something else? In retrospect, the Clause has seemed to have the poignancy of a path not taken – a trail abandoned in the Slaughter-House Cases and later lamented by academics, litigants, and even some judges. Although wistful thoughts about the Privileges or Immunities Clause may seem to lend legitimacy to incorporation, the Clause actually led in another direction. Long-forgotten evidence clearly shows that the Clause was an attempt to resolve a national dispute about …
Nonimmigrants, Equal Protection, And The Supremacy Clause,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
Nonimmigrants, Equal Protection, And The Supremacy Clause, Justin Hess
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
