Stereotype Threat In Criminal Interrogations: Why Innocent Black Suspects Are At Risk For Confessing Falsely,
2011
University at Albany, State University of New York
Stereotype Threat In Criminal Interrogations: Why Innocent Black Suspects Are At Risk For Confessing Falsely, Cynthia J. Najdowski
Psychology Faculty Scholarship
Little theoretical attention has been paid to evidence that Blacks are overrepresented in samples of false confessors compared to Whites. One possible explanation is that innocent Black suspects experience stereotype threat in interrogations and that this threat causes Black suspects to experience more arousal, self-regulatory efforts, and cognitive load compared to White suspects. These psychological mechanisms could lead innocent Black suspects to display more nonverbal behaviors associated with deception and, ironically, increase the likelihood that police investigators perceive them as guilty. In response, investigators might engage in more coercive tactics and exert more pressure to confess on Black suspects than …
The Freedom Of Health,
2011
Cleveland State University College of Law
The Freedom Of Health, Abigail R. Moncrieff
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article first draws out the freedom of health from Supreme Court precedent and demonstrates that, like other substantive constitutional rights, the freedom of health is a negative liberty that must be balanced against legitimate and compelling regulatory projects. The Article then applies that understanding of the freedom to evaluate some proposed and actual health care regulations that have made headline news in the last decade. I consider the constitutionality of the phantom death panels, the HlNl vaccine distribution program, the FDA's restrictions on access to experimental drugs, PPACA's obesity and smoking regulations, and, of course, PPACA's individual mandate. Should …
Mcdonald's Other Right,
2011
Florida State University College of Law
Mcdonald's Other Right, Samuel L. Wiseman
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
The Original Public Understanding Of Privileges Or Immunities,
2011
Brigham Young University Law School
The Original Public Understanding Of Privileges Or Immunities, James J. Ward
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Free Exercise After Employment Division V. Smith: Same-Sex Marriage, The "War On Terror," And Religious Freedom,
2011
University of Virginia School of Law
The Politics Of Free Exercise After Employment Division V. Smith: Same-Sex Marriage, The "War On Terror," And Religious Freedom, Richard Schragger
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens,
2011
Touro Law Center
The Last Common Law Justice: The Personal Jurisdiction Jurisprudence Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Death Of The Fourteenth Amendment: Castle Rock And Its Progeny,
2011
William & Mary Law School
The Death Of The Fourteenth Amendment: Castle Rock And Its Progeny, G. Kristian Miccio
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Tango Or More - From California's Lesson 9 To The Constitutionality Of A Gay-Friendly Curriculum In Public Elementary Schools,
2011
Boston College Law School
Tango Or More - From California's Lesson 9 To The Constitutionality Of A Gay-Friendly Curriculum In Public Elementary Schools, Amy Lai
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
In August 2009, a group of parents in California filed a lawsuit, Balde v. Alameda Unified School District, in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. They alleged that the Alameda Unified School District refused them the right to excuse their children from a new curriculum, Lesson 9, that would teach public elementary school children about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) families. The proposed curriculum included short sessions about GLBT people, incorporated into more general lessons about family and health, once a year from kindergarten through fifth grade. Kindergarteners would learn the harms of teasing, while fifth graders …
Debate On Birthright Citizenship,
2011
Chapman University Fowler School of Law
Debate On Birthright Citizenship, John Eastman Dr., Ediberto Román
Faculty Publications
The following is the transcript from a debate between Dr. John Eastman and Professor Ediberto Roman, and moderated by Dean of the Florida International University College of Law, Alex Acosta. This debate took place on February 24-25, 2011 as a part of the FIU Law Review's Symposium on immigration reform in the United States. Specifically, this debate centers on the Fourteenth Amendment and birthright citizenship. Both Dr. Eastman and Professor Romdn were given ten minutes for their own remarks, beginning with Dr. Eastman. After the opening remarks, the debate goes into a brief back-and-forth between Dr. Eastman and Professor Roman …
Amending The Prison Litigation Reform Act: Imposing Financial Burdens On Prisoners Over Tax Payers, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1061 (2011),
2011
UIC School of Law
Amending The Prison Litigation Reform Act: Imposing Financial Burdens On Prisoners Over Tax Payers, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1061 (2011), Mallory Yontz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Zero Tolerance: A Proper Definition, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1107 (2011),
2011
UIC School of Law
Zero Tolerance: A Proper Definition, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1107 (2011), Peter Follenweider
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Thirteenth Amendment, Interest Convergence, And The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Thirteenth Amendment, Interest Convergence, And The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, William M. Carter Jr.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
What’S Different About The Thirteenth Amendment, And Why Does It Matter?,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
What’S Different About The Thirteenth Amendment, And Why Does It Matter?, James Gray Pope
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds, Julie Novkov
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conclusion: The Political Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Conclusion: The Political Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?, Daniel R. H. Mendelsohn
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Once And Future Equal Protection Doctrine?,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
The Once And Future Equal Protection Doctrine?, Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky
Articles
This Essay is the third in a series of pieces assessing Equal Protection Doctrine and jurisprudence. Here, we endeavor to do two things: (1) to utilize constitutional structure, text, and history to interrogate the concept of equality protected under the Fourteenth Amendment; and (2) to critique the Supreme Court's present approach to adjudicating constitutional discrimination claims. With regard to the meaning of equality, we assert that if the text of the Reconstruction Amendments and the stated goals of Reconstruction are used to inform constitutional analysis, then equality should be understood as a substantive rather than formalist concept. Reconstruction, however, was …
Ricci V. Destefano And Disparate Treatment: How The Case Makes Title Vii And The Equal Protection Clause Unworkable, 39 Cap. U. L. Rev. 1 (2011),
2011
John Marshall Law School
Ricci V. Destefano And Disparate Treatment: How The Case Makes Title Vii And The Equal Protection Clause Unworkable, 39 Cap. U. L. Rev. 1 (2011), Allen R. Kamp
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Putting Rationality Back Into The Rational Basis Test: Saving Substantive Due Process And Redeeming The Promise Of The Ninth Amendment,
2011
Washburn University School of Law
Putting Rationality Back Into The Rational Basis Test: Saving Substantive Due Process And Redeeming The Promise Of The Ninth Amendment, Jeffrey D. Jackson
University of Richmond Law Review
This article argues for the adoption of a strengthened rational basis test that would allow courts to scrutinize the actual purpose behind legislation and demand that the legislation actually be reasonably related to its valid legislative purpose. Part II looks at the question of why it is desirable to save substantive due process rather than replace it with some other doctrine. Part III examines how substantive due process came to be the dominant form of protection for unenumerated rights, and how it has evolved from its antecedents in English law to the current test. It concludes that substantive due process …
Will We Finally See Courtroom Debate?,
2011
New York Law School
Will We Finally See Courtroom Debate?, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
