The Future Of Freedom Of Expression Online,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
The Future Of Freedom Of Expression Online, Evelyn Aswad
Faculty Articles
Should social media companies ban Holocaust denial from their platforms? What about conspiracy theorists that spew hate? Does good corporate citizenship mean platforms should remove offensive speech or tolerate it? The content moderation rules that companies develop to govern speech on their platforms will have significant implications for the future of freedom of expression. Given that the prospects for compelling platforms to respect users’ free speech rights are bleak within the U.S. system, what can be done to protect this important right? In June 2018, the United Nations’ top expert for freedom of expression called on companies to align their …
The Right To Receive Foreign Speech,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
The Right To Receive Foreign Speech, Joseph Thai
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Introductory Essay: Old Principles For An (Allegedly) Brave New World,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
An Introductory Essay: Old Principles For An (Allegedly) Brave New World, Harry F. Tepker
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Is There Any Silver Lining To Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. V. Comer?,
2018
University of Miami School of Law
Is There Any Silver Lining To Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. V. Comer?, Caroline Mala Corbin
Articles
No abstract provided.
Real "Fake News" And Fake "Fake News",
2018
University of Miami School of Law
The First Queer Right,
2018
University of Colorado Law School
The First Queer Right, Scott Skinner-Thompson
Michigan Law Review
A review of Carlos A. Ball, The First Amendment and LGBT Equality: A Contentious History.
Constitutional Anomalies Or As-Applied Challenges? A Defense Of Religious Exemptions,
2018
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
Constitutional Anomalies Or As-Applied Challenges? A Defense Of Religious Exemptions, Mark L. Rienzi
Scholarly Articles
In the wake of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and now in anticipation of Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc., the notion that religious exemptions are dangerously out of step with norms of Constitutional jurisprudence has taken on a renewed popularity. Critics increasingly claim that religious exemptions, such as those available prior to Employment Division v. Smith and now available under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), are a threat to basic fairness, equality, and the rule of law. Under this view, exemptions create an anomalous private right to ignore laws that everyone else must obey, and such a scheme …
Editor’S Introduction,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
False Speech And The First Amendment,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
False Speech And The First Amendment, Erwin Chemerinsky
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lies, Line Drawing, And (Deep) Fake News,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Lies, Line Drawing, And (Deep) Fake News, Marc Jonathan Blitz
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legislating Against Lying In Campaigns And Elections,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Legislating Against Lying In Campaigns And Elections, Joshua S. Sellers
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech And Domain Allocation: A Suggested Framework For Analyzing The Constitutionality Of Prohibition Of Lies,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Free Speech And Domain Allocation: A Suggested Framework For Analyzing The Constitutionality Of Prohibition Of Lies, James Weinstein
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Suing The President For First Amendment Violations,
2018
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Suing The President For First Amendment Violations, Sonja R. West
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Martin, Ghana, And Global Legal Studies,
2018
Duke Law School
Martin, Ghana, And Global Legal Studies, H. Timothy Lovelace Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
This brief essay uses global legal studies to reconsider Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s activism after Gayle v. Browder. During this undertheorized portion of King's career, the civil rights leader traveled the world and gained a greater appreciation for comparative legal and political analysis. This essay explores King's first trip abroad and demonstrates how King's close study of Kwame Nkrumah's approaches to law reform helped to lay the foundation for watershed moments in King's own life.
In To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr., renowned civil rights scholar and author, Adam …
Stop Defending Discrimination: Anti-Boycott, Divestment, And Sanctions* Statutes Are Fully Constitutional,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Stop Defending Discrimination: Anti-Boycott, Divestment, And Sanctions* Statutes Are Fully Constitutional, Mark Goldfeder
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Talk Isn't Cheap: Protecting Freedom Of Speech In Light Of Georgia's Anti-Boycott Legislation,
2018
University of Georgia School of Law
Talk Isn't Cheap: Protecting Freedom Of Speech In Light Of Georgia's Anti-Boycott Legislation, Maria Kachniarz
Georgia Law Review
Historically,political boycotts have occupied a central
place in American tradition, going as far back as the
Founding. However, the years of 2016 and 2017 have
marked a sudden influx of state anti-boycott legislation.
Georgia was no exception, passing a statute in 2016
prohibiting those who boycott Israel from contracting
with the state. This statue violates the FirstAmendment
guaranteesof freedom of speech. First, boycotts of Israel,
or BDS as they are collectively called, are protected
political speech. The Supreme Court has repeatedly
protected politically motivated boycotts, despite their
detrimental economic effects. Further, Georgia's anti-
boycott legislation impermissibly stifles that protected
speech …
The First Amendment Case Against Partisan Gerrymandering,
2018
Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore LLP
The First Amendment Case Against Partisan Gerrymandering, Emmet J. Bondurant Ii, Ben W. Thorpe
Georgia Law Review
The Supreme Court recognizes that "[p]artisan
gerrymanders... [are incompatible] with democratic
principles."I This makes good sense. The fundamental
objective of redistrictingis to "establish 'fairand effective
representation for all citizens. '2 And partisan
gerrymandering-whichthe Supreme Court defines as
"drawing... district lines to subordinate adherents of
one political party and entrench a rival party in
power'--runs counter to that fundamental objective.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has yet to invalidate
a redistricting plan solely as an unconstitutional
partisan gerrymander. This Symposium issue of the
Georgia Law Review, however, comes at a crucial
moment in the Court's treatment of that question. A case
now …
Climate Change Disinformation, Citizen Competence, And The First Amendment,
2018
University of Colorado Law School
Climate Change Disinformation, Citizen Competence, And The First Amendment, James Weinstein
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech Hypocrisy: Campus Free Speech Conflicts And The Sub-Legal First Amendment,
2018
University of Colorado Law School
Free Speech Hypocrisy: Campus Free Speech Conflicts And The Sub-Legal First Amendment, Christina E. Wells
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
Categorizing Lies,
2018
University of Colorado Law School
Categorizing Lies, David S. Han
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
