Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Pride And Predators, Heidi S. Bond

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Pride and Prejudice. by Jane Austen

Time’S Up: A Call To Eradicate Ncaa Monopsony Through Federal Legislation, Ashley Jo Zaccagnini

SMU Law Review Forum

Few traditions are as near and dear to the hearts of Americans as college athletics. The institution holds a special place in society because it reflects the ultimate convergence of those values that uniquely define the United States: loyalty, competitiveness, and pride. However, the notion of basic fairness seems to have been excluded along the way, as the commercialization of college athletics gave way to total dominance over the industry by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The NCAA promulgates sports rules and organizes collegiate-level championships, but its most influential role involves promoting “amateurism,” or the notion that student-athletes are …

Who Killed The Mockingbird?-An Analysis Of Community Theatres' Legal Standing Amid Copyright Disputes Over To Kill A Mockingbird And How To Protect Community Theatres, Yifan Li

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

What Is Cultural Misappropriation And Why Does It Matter? 03-31-2021, Roger Williams University School Of Law

School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events

No abstract provided.

Barnet As Tr. Of 2012 Saretta Barnet Revocable Tr. V. Ministry Of Culture & Sports Of The Hellenic Republic, 961 F.3d 193 (2d Cir. 2020), Meghan Jackson

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

Fighting To Protect Individual Privacy In A Rapidly Advancing Technological World, Farzana Ahmed

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

The Nflpo: The Nfl's Private Patent Office, Paul Fina

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

Ex Ante Intellectual Property Considerations For Small Businesses, Jason A. Sanders

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

Revitalizing Language Through Education: Ireland's Use Of International Law To Drive Linguistic Preservation, Emma A. O'Connell

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

The Data Privacy Landscape During Covid-19: An Exploration Of Some Of The Major Data Privacy Regulations And Trends, Gitanjali Deb

DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law

No abstract provided.

Diamond Anniversary: 75 Years Of The Lanham Act, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Cardozo Fame Center

2020–2021 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The New Era Of Nfl Antitrust Law, The Sunday Ticket Package: Was The Ninth Circuit Ruling A Touchdown Or A Penalty?, Maya Rustom

Pepperdine Law Review

Americans love football, but every year thousands of fans are forced to pay exorbitant annual fees if they chose to have access to out-of-market games. In other words, if fans don’t live in the territory of their favorite team, they can either pay an excessive annual fee to watch their team play or miss out on the majority of games every season. This arrangement is a result of DirecTV’s Sunday Ticket Package, which is an exclusive distributorship agreement with the NFL that prevents fans from watching live out-of-market games unless they pay the annual subscription fee. This Comment addresses and …

Protecting The First Amendment Rights Of Video Games From Lanham Act And Right Of Publicity Claims, Yen-Shyang Tseng

Pepperdine Law Review

In 2013 and 2015, the Ninth Circuit decided two nearly identical cases in which professional football players alleged a video game publisher used their likenesses without authorization in a game that simulates real football games. One plaintiff brought a false endorsement claim under the Lanham Act, while others brought state law right of publicity claims. That made all the difference. The Ninth Circuit found the First Amendment protected the game against the false endorsement claim, but not against the right of publicity claims. These contradictory results stem from court’s application of the Rogers v. Grimaldi test to Lanham Act claims …

Open World Regulation: The Urgent Need For Federal Legislation On Video Game Loot Boxes, Alex Reyes

Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts

Loot boxes are items in video games that contain randomized prizes that players can purchase with real-world money. In recent years, loot boxes have come under scrutiny because the relationship between behavior and the underlying mechanics of loot boxes are similar to that of addictive behaviors associated with real-world gambling. Many papers suggest solutions focused on industry changes without direct regulation. However, these papers neglect the enormous profit incentive to maintain a business practice which can have detrimental behavioral effects on children. The United States federal government must take example from a growing number of European countries and ban the …

Federal Architecture And First Amendment Limits, Jessica Rizzo

Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts

In December of 2020, President Trump issued an executive order on “Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture,” a draft of which was leaked to the press in February under the title, “Making Federal Buildings Beautiful Again.” The order provided for updating the Guiding Principles of the General Services Administration’s Design Excellence Program to promote the use of “classical and traditional architectural styles,” which “have proven their ability to inspire…respect for our system of self-government.” According to the order, there would have been a presumption against the use of such modern architectural styles as Brutalism and Deconstructivism in the construction of new …

Table Of Contents, Ashley Stoll

Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts

No abstract provided.

The Music Industry: Drowning In The Stream, Jonathan Croskrey

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

The Department of Justice is reviewing two of it's oldest consent decrees, which were entered into with ASCAP and BMI. ASCAP and BMI are the two original performing rights organizations and existed well before streaming. This article analyzes copyright and antirust law through the lens of modern technology and the current landscape of the music industry. It examines whether the consent decrees should be removed or modified and what the consequences of each would be.

Warner Bros. V. Nelson: A Prelude To The De Havilland Law, John M. Broderick

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review

In 1944, the California Court of Appeals handed down its landmark decision in De Haviland v. Warner Bros ending the practice of studios extending personal service contracts beyond the statutory limit of seven years by adding suspension periods incurred during the contract term. “Suspension/extension” could double the term of an actor’s contract. The De Haviland case has justly received much attention, but an earlier case, Warner Bros. v. Nelson, in which Bette Davis also challenged the practice of suspension/extension, merits more attention than it has received.

In Warner Bros. Nelson, Davis argued that her studio contract should not …

Flash Infringement 2.0: Protecting “Unique Performance” From Live Social Media Distribution As A Right Of Publicity, Michael M. Epstein

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review

This Article posits that state law right of publicity actions offer a potential remedy for non-musical performers who fall victim to the phenomenon of “flash infringement,” the instantaneous and unauthorized uploading and dissemination of performances by live event audiences. In 2021, comedians, actors and magicians, may be able to use the right of publicity to protect the value of their unique performances, since their non-musical acts are not covered by the Federal Anti-Bootlegging Statute. Moreover, under California law, secondary liability actions with respect to this unique performance right might allow performers to sue social media companies for providing a commercial …

Reimagining Content Moderation: Section 230 And The Path To Industry-Government Cooperation, Yeva Mikaelyan

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review

In February 2020, the Ninth Circuit held that YouTube, as a private entity, does not have to provide First Amendment protections to its content creators. The holding was not surprising or groundbreaking, but the case served as catalyst in the discussion of how platforms should moderate content. This was further amplified when over the summer, Twitter started to add warnings under some of President Donald Trump’s tweets. In response, the President called to “REVOKE 230.”

“230” refers to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. At a high level, Section 230 allows platforms to moderate content at their discretion without …