Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (3044)
- Communications Law (1361)
- Science and Technology Law (618)
- Internet Law (578)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (541)
-
- First Amendment (527)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (510)
- Constitutional Law (431)
- Computer Law (423)
- International Law (422)
- Law and Society (421)
- Labor and Employment Law (409)
- Contracts (381)
- Education Law (366)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (361)
- Legislation (347)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Law and Gender (343)
- Legal Education (335)
- Criminal Law (308)
- Torts (308)
- Gaming Law (304)
- Cultural Heritage Law (300)
- Legal History (287)
- Jurisprudence (284)
- Property Law and Real Estate (283)
- Law and Economics (282)
- Commercial Law (280)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1444)
- Marquette University Law School (858)
- UC Law SF (849)
- Fordham Law School (536)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (465)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (247)
- Seattle University School of Law (214)
- University of Miami Law School (193)
- University of Michigan Law School (168)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (139)
- UIC School of Law (134)
- DePaul University (128)
- Pepperdine University (128)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (93)
- University of Washington School of Law (89)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (86)
- Pace University (80)
- University of Georgia School of Law (74)
- American University Washington College of Law (72)
- Brooklyn Law School (57)
- BLR (53)
- University of Baltimore Law (46)
- Cleveland State University (42)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (42)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (37)
- University of Kentucky (35)
- Brigham Young University Law School (33)
- William & Mary Law School (32)
- Columbia Law School (31)
- University of New Hampshire (31)
- Keyword
-
- Sports (345)
- Copyright (326)
- Arbitration (244)
- Major League Baseball (238)
- NCAA (168)
-
- Antitrust (132)
- Title IX (131)
- Baseball (116)
- Athletes (114)
- First Amendment (104)
- Intellectual property (96)
- Trademark (87)
- Sports law (83)
- Copyright law (80)
- Music (78)
- NFL (77)
- College sports (75)
- Internet (71)
- National Collegiate Athletic Association (71)
- Copyright infringement (70)
- Football (60)
- MLB (59)
- Patent (59)
- Fair use (58)
- Antitrust law (52)
- Athletics (52)
- First amendment (52)
- Art (51)
- Law (51)
- Sports Law (51)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1151)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (846)
- Marquette Sports Law Review (838)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (508)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (456)
-
- Seattle University Law Review (201)
- University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review (139)
- Faculty Scholarship (129)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (119)
- Arbitrator Charts (107)
- Michigan Law Review (82)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (78)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review (77)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (67)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (67)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog (66)
- Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum (66)
- Articles (52)
- Pepperdine Law Review (52)
- ExpressO (51)
- DePaul Journal of Sports Law (49)
- All Faculty Scholarship (46)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (42)
- Indiana Law Journal (37)
- UIC Law Review (36)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (34)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (32)
- Team - Player Results (30)
- Team Hearing Charts (30)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 7179
Full-Text Articles in Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law
A Look Inside The Nba’S Game-Changing Technical Foul: The Warner Bros. Discovery And Nba Broadcast Rights Dispute And How It Could Have Been Resolved Through Alternative Dispute Resolution, Nicola Coates
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Despite being “the greatest studio show in sports TV history” and winning numerous Emmy Awards, the TNT Sports icon Inside the NBA was on the brink of disappearing. In 2024, the National Basketball Association (NBA) opted into a $77 billion contract with NBC, Amazon, and Disney’s ESPN, ending its forty-year relationship with Warner Brothers Discovery (Warner Bros. Discovery), the parent company of TNT Sports. Warner Bros. Discovery filed suit, alleging that, by rejecting its offer in favor of NBC, Amazon, and Disney, the NBA breached the parties’ 2014 media rights agreement, which included a right to match third-party offers. The …
A Fireside Chat With Aarti Sheth '14, Netflix, Cardozo Fame Center, Aarti Sheth
A Fireside Chat With Aarti Sheth '14, Netflix, Cardozo Fame Center, Aarti Sheth
2026 Event Invitations
Aarti Sheth '14, Director, HR Business Partner at Netflix, will join Professor Barbara Kolsun '82, Director of the FAME Center, in a conversation about finding work in the entertainment industry.
Converting Buildings Is Hard: Why Seattle’S Municipal Government Should Streamline Commercial-To-Residential Conversions, Tyler M. King
Converting Buildings Is Hard: Why Seattle’S Municipal Government Should Streamline Commercial-To-Residential Conversions, Tyler M. King
Seattle University Law Review
The conversion of commercial buildings into housing is a promising solution to the growing housing crisis in many urban areas. However, despite its potential benefits, the process of repurposing commercial spaces is often stymied by complex zoning codes, high conversion costs, and bureaucratic hurdles. This Article argues that the local and state governments in Seattle should adopt more streamlined policies and offer greater incentives to developers to facilitate these conversions. By reforming zoning regulations and providing targeted financial support, municipalities can reduce the barriers to conversion and unlock the potential of underutilized commercial properties. This article examines the legal and …
Getting Money Out Of Politics By Putting Money Into Politics: A Few Modest Proposals To Reform Seattle’S Democracy Voucher Program, Decker O’Donnell
Getting Money Out Of Politics By Putting Money Into Politics: A Few Modest Proposals To Reform Seattle’S Democracy Voucher Program, Decker O’Donnell
Seattle University Law Review
Seattle’s Democracy Voucher Program offers an unconventional response to the growing influence of money in American elections: rather than restricting political spending, it seeks to amplify the participation of ordinary voters by providing publicly funded vouchers that residents may assign to participating candidates. This Article examines the program’s development, operation, and constitutional foundation within the modern campaign-finance framework established by Buckley v. Valeo and subsequent Supreme Court decisions. It argues that democracy vouchers provide a constitutionally viable means of broadening participation in campaign financing while mitigating the influence of wealthy donors. The Article identifies two weaknesses in the current system: …
Legal Malpractice In Washington: Use Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct, Angelo Tadrous
Legal Malpractice In Washington: Use Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct, Angelo Tadrous
Seattle University Law Review
Legal malpractice claims are difficult to prove. They are difficult to prove because many jurisdictions require that a plaintiff prove that, but for the lawyer’s misconduct, the client would have fared better. Thus, in a malpractice suit, a plaintiff must try a case within a case. Despite this difficulty, many jurisdictions prohibit the use of the Rules of Professional Conduct when litigating a malpractice case. Washington State is one of these jurisdictions. The Washington Supreme Court held in Hizey v. Carpenter that the Rules of Professional Conduct may not be referred to during trial. This Note argues that this prohibition …
Who Decides The Dead? Interpreting Washington’S Disposition Of Remains Statute, Wyatt Young
Who Decides The Dead? Interpreting Washington’S Disposition Of Remains Statute, Wyatt Young
Seattle University Law Review
Washington’s disposition-of-remains statute, RCW 68.50.160, is designed to honor a decedent’s expressed wishes regarding the control and disposition of their body after death. Yet recent litigation reveals a critical gap between the statute’s intent-centered design and its practical enforceability. In Larotonda v. Blackburn, a trial court acknowledged that irreparable harm would occur if a decedent’s burial wishes were ignored but nonetheless denied relief on the grounds that the individual designated to carry out those wishes lacked standing. The result was a legal paradox: a statute that recognizes decedent autonomy in theory but withholds any meaningful mechanism for its enforcement …
El Mercado De Pescado – The Dembow Fish Market Case: Browne V. Donalds, Catherine Stagliano
El Mercado De Pescado – The Dembow Fish Market Case: Browne V. Donalds, Catherine Stagliano
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog
The billion-dollar Latin music industry is facing its most formidable opponent yet: Steely & Clevie.[1] While this name may be unfamiliar, the musical duo has raised a crucial issue against a seemingly settled principle of copyright infringement: whether a rhythm is copyrightable.[2] The rhythm in question is reportedly an integral part of the entire genre of reggaeton.[3] Nonetheless, Steely & Clevie decided to sue over 100 Defendants—including Bad Bunny, the most streamed artist in the world—for copyright infringement across almost 4,000 songs.[4] Now, one copyright infringement case has the power to dictate the future of reggaeton and severely disrupt music …
Major League Baseball's Major Labor Boondoggle: Rethinking Salary Arbitration, Matthew W. Givens
Major League Baseball's Major Labor Boondoggle: Rethinking Salary Arbitration, Matthew W. Givens
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Three Decades Of Supreme Court Copyright Decisions: A Peek Behind The Scenes, Jonathan Band
Three Decades Of Supreme Court Copyright Decisions: A Peek Behind The Scenes, Jonathan Band
Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series
This article discusses the revelations in the case files of eight Supreme Court Justices concerning eighteen copyright-related decisions issued by the Court between 1973 and 2005. The papers show the Court as a profoundly human institution, with the Justices often struggling to craft opinions that could gain the support of a majority. The Justices clearly cared about the copyright merits, but they were also willing to compromise to achieve a certain result. In several cases, the final opinion was anything but inevitable. This was particularly so with Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984), …
Lawyers Behind The Game: How Team General Counsel Shape The Future Of Sports, Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal Symposium
Lawyers Behind The Game: How Team General Counsel Shape The Future Of Sports, Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal Symposium
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Love, Hurts: How Third-Party Fine Payments Challenge The Integrity Of Collective Bargaining Agreements In The Nfl, Isabella Astolfi
Love, Hurts: How Third-Party Fine Payments Challenge The Integrity Of Collective Bargaining Agreements In The Nfl, Isabella Astolfi
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Reining In The Private Nondelegation Doctrine: Examining The Constitutionality Of The Horseracing Integrity And Safety Act In Light Of Fcc V. Consumers' Research, Kathryn Dorans
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Offside Advantage: Disparities In High School Athletic Funding And The Turn Toward State-Based Legal Remedies, Skylar Glass
Offside Advantage: Disparities In High School Athletic Funding And The Turn Toward State-Based Legal Remedies, Skylar Glass
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Politics On The Podium: The International Olympic Committee's Selective Enforcement Of Country Bans, Olivia Jaffe
Politics On The Podium: The International Olympic Committee's Selective Enforcement Of Country Bans, Olivia Jaffe
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Private Equity And The Gridiron: Tax Considerations In Secondary Sales Of Nfl Investments, Harrison Penn Nugent
Private Equity And The Gridiron: Tax Considerations In Secondary Sales Of Nfl Investments, Harrison Penn Nugent
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Period-Proofing Your Data, Sofia Makepeace
Period-Proofing Your Data, Sofia Makepeace
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Menstrual cycle tracking apps and their accompanying wearables, collectively known as FemTech, promise women health insights in a healthcare system that often fails to treat problems that primarily affect women. FemTech lets users map their cycles, recognize symptoms, experience non-hormonal birth control, and contribute to long-overdue research on conditions like endometriosis, PCOS, and perimenopause. But after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the same datasets that empower users have also become valuable in criminalizing abortion-related crimes. Because most FemTech privacy policies fall outside HIPAA, intimate logs of bleeding, sex, mood, and biometric signals can now be criminal evidence in …
The Algorithmic Collusion Problem: A Judicial Framework For Analyzing Algorithms Under § 1 Of The Sherman Act, Rix Ryskamp
The Algorithmic Collusion Problem: A Judicial Framework For Analyzing Algorithms Under § 1 Of The Sherman Act, Rix Ryskamp
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Courts are increasingly seeing Sherman Act Section 1 claims that involve AI and other software algorithms at the center of alleged conspiracies to unreasonably restrain trade—often called algorithmic collusion claims. Adjudicating these claims can involve complex analyses of how algorithms interact with alleged conspiracies. However, most of the Section 1 case law stems from traditional agreements and can be hard to apply to algorithmic collusion scenarios. This Article provides a framework that judges and other adjudicators might use to analyze the role of an algorithm in an alleged conspiracy without becoming bogged down in technical details early in the case. …
Stacking The Deck: Ai, Jury Selection, And The New Batson Problem, Alexandria Serra
Stacking The Deck: Ai, Jury Selection, And The New Batson Problem, Alexandria Serra
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Generative artificial intelligence has infiltrated jury selection right under our noses. What began as a passive data mining experiment has evolved into AI-powered jury selection tools that profile potential jurors by scoring, ranking, and recommending which citizens to exclude from jury service. Although these tools promise objectivity, they risk encoding the same racial and gender biases that Batson v. Kentucky sought to eliminate. Courtroom AI is here to stay. But when lawyers delegate peremptory strikes to statistical models trained on biased data, Batson becomes obsolete. No court can detect algorithmic bias that lacks discernible intent. No judge can analyze whether …
The Data Broker Loophole: Medicare’S Version, Ana Wacker
The Data Broker Loophole: Medicare’S Version, Ana Wacker
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
U.S. consumers participate in the exchange of less data privacy for the benefit of cheaper pricing, innovative services, and the illusion of choice. However, consumer choice at the expense of minimal data privacy has encouraged data broker markets to thrive on pure profit incentives. Seniors participating in Medicare enrollment feel the impact of these profit motives acutely. The Medicare enrollment process is littered with Third Party Marketing Organizations (TPMOs) who use lead generators to target seniors. With no consent, lead generators target Medicare eligible individuals and forward their personal information to insurance agents for a fee. The lead generators operate …
The Risk-Assessment Case For Worldwide Public Health Regulation Of The Concussion Crisis In Sports, Marcus Moore, Charles H. Tator
The Risk-Assessment Case For Worldwide Public Health Regulation Of The Concussion Crisis In Sports, Marcus Moore, Charles H. Tator
All Faculty Publications
The support of the medical profession was indispensable in the USA and Canada to enacting legislation addressing public health issues such as drunk driving, smoking, and bicycle helmets. The sports concussion crisis is a major public health concern in Canada and in many other countries.
Advocacy Matters, Richard Collins
Advocacy Matters, Richard Collins
American Indian Law Journal
The Supreme Court’s 2022 Castro-Huerta decision was wrong on the points it discussed. It was doubly wrong for a reason it ignored. But the latter error was shared because all briefs and the dissenting opinion ignored it as well. The question presented was whether a nineteenth-century federal Indian country statute provided for exclusive federal jurisdiction over interracial crimes, or for concurrent authority with states. The Court held that the statute allowed concurrent jurisdiction. But it ignored the fact that Congress and the Court, until fairly recently, avoided concurrent federal-state jurisdiction over crimes. Had the self-styled originalist Justices taken their theory …
Stability At Stake: The Effects Of Overturning Chevron On Indian Gaming, Evan Callahan
Stability At Stake: The Effects Of Overturning Chevron On Indian Gaming, Evan Callahan
American Indian Law Journal
The Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright to overturn Chevron Deference marks a significant change in administrative law and could have drastic consequences for the regulation of Indian gaming in the United States. This Note explores the implications of such a shift, emphasizing the importance of maintaining stability in the highly regulated gaming industry. Many stakeholders, including operators, investors, regulatory agencies, and patrons, may face significant uncertainty without doctrines such as Chevron Deference. Without agency expertise in interpreting statutes, the Court may instead directly influence the regulation of Indian gaming in the United States, presenting challenges and uncertainties for all …
Tribal Nations As Lords Of The Fee: A Common Law Argument For Tribal Discretion In Spending Federal Forfeiture Funds, Kent A. Anderson
Tribal Nations As Lords Of The Fee: A Common Law Argument For Tribal Discretion In Spending Federal Forfeiture Funds, Kent A. Anderson
American Indian Law Journal
Federal criminal forfeiture is a powerful tool meeting at the nexus of criminal law and property law. Courts justify its use based on its English common law history. After seizing and selling assets, the federal government doles out payments from its Assets Forfeiture Fund to cooperating law enforcement agencies through equitable sharing agreements that bind recipients to use funds for law enforcement purposes. Tribal Nations have compelling legal and policy arguments for their entitlement to greater access to and discretion over forfeiture funds obtained through seizures in Indian country. These legal arguments are grounded in: (1) federal criminal forfeiture’s failure …
September 2024 – August 2025 Case Law On American Indians, Thomas P. Schlosser
September 2024 – August 2025 Case Law On American Indians, Thomas P. Schlosser
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reading Between The Treaties: Why The Supreme Court Must Honor The Indian Canons Of Construction, Amelia R. Wimmer
Reading Between The Treaties: Why The Supreme Court Must Honor The Indian Canons Of Construction, Amelia R. Wimmer
American Indian Law Journal
This Note critically examines the Indian canons of construction as interpretive tools employed by the United States Supreme Court in cases involving treaties and statutes with Tribal Nations. Ultimately tracing their origins to Worcester v. Georgia, this Note explores how the Indian canons were designed to protect tribal sovereignty, ensure the liberal construction of ambiguous provisions in favor of tribes, and prevent the abrogation of tribal land and rights. Shifts in interpretive philosophy and the rise of textualism have led to a checkered application of the Indian canons across courts. However, a continued application of the Indian canons is necessary …