Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Fourth Amendment Issues And Covid-19 Tracking, Brooke A. Banks

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the special needs doctrine does not justify warrantless government access to cell site location information (CSLI) for COVID-19 tracking, as individual privacy interests outweigh public health benefits. It advocates for voluntary, privacy-protective measures, such as opt-in apps, to balance privacy and pandemic response.

#Freebritney: The Importance Of Public Access To The Guardianship System, Cecily D'Amore

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the systemic issues in the U.S. guardianship system, highlighted by Britney Spears' highly publicized conservatorship case, and advocates for increased transparency and accountability. It argues that while guardianship laws are designed to protect vulnerable individuals, cases like Spears' reveal gaps in oversight, inconsistent public access to records, and the need for less restrictive alternatives. The note proposes reforms, including enhanced public access to guardianship case information and the creation of a centralized database, to address these shortcomings and prevent abuse.

Mechanical Licenses And The Willing Buyer/Willing Seller Standard: Establishing Royalty Rates In A Vacuum Of Knowledge, Natalie Linn

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The Music Modernization Act (MMA) introduced a significant shift in determining mechanical royalty rates by replacing the 801(b)(1) standard with the willing buyer-willing seller standard. This change, while aiming to establish fair market value, presents challenges for the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) due to the lack of a comparable market and the influence of statutory licensing. The transition is expected to increase royalty rates, impacting various stakeholders, including copyright owners, streaming services, and consumers, and may lead to heightened disputes and uncertainty in the industry.

Any Port In A Storm: What Social Media Platforms Should Do To Address The Shifting Legal Tides Governing Content Embedding, Laura Cohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Masthead - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 40 (2022-23)

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 40, Iss. 1

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Uncovering Patent Prosecution: An Obvious(Ness) Negotiation, Orit Fischman-Afori, Yifat Nahmias, Iris Soroker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Because a patent is a license for a monopoly affecting the public good, the process of patent prosecution deserves close scrutiny. Yet, significant aspects of this process remain unexplored. In particular, two central thresholds for patent eligibility, "novelty" and "nonobviousness," regarded as the bedrock of patent law worldwide, have rarely been examined on an empirical basis. Investigating how these requirements are invoked during the patent prosecution process is critical to understanding how the application of patent law's central tenets affects the quantity and quality of the resulting patents and, ultimately, the public interest.

In this empirical study, we examine a …

Autumn Is Coming: A Novel Liability Theory That May Kill Pharmaceutical Evergreening, Uri Y. Hacohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Pharmaceutical evergreening-attempts by brand-name manufacturers to leverage patent rights to artificially extend legal protection for drugs-is among the most pressing and unresolved public policy challenges of our time. On July 14, 2021, in Sanofi et al. vs. Unipharm Ltd., the Israeli Supreme Court adopted a novel and internationally unprecedented legal policy to combat the evergreening pandemic. By using its equitable powers, the Israeli court empowered a generic manufacturer, Unipharm, to claim on behalf of the public interest the wrongly obtained monopoly profits that a brand-name manufacturer, Sanofi, obtained by improperly leveraging its improvement patent to impair generic market entry. This …

Examining The Fourth Amendment And Biometric Data Privacy Law Implications Of Ncaa Athletes' Mandated Use Of Athlete Biometric Data Tracking Devices, Alicia Jessop

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article presents the first in-depth analysis of the privacy law implications, under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and individual states' biometric data privacy laws, resulting from National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) member institutions mandating that athletes wear athlete biometric data (ABD) tracking devices. The Article provides the NCAA' and its member institutions, athletes, and Congress with recommendations of how to respond to the privacy law concerns that exist in a period of expanded ABD collection, use, and storage. Part I discusses the growing practice of athletics departments requiring intercollegiate athletes to wear ABD tracking devices. …

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Notice And Consent Requirements Under The Gdpr, The Ccpa/Cpra, And The Fcc Broadband Privacy Order, Scott Jordan

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

We compare the notice and consent requirements of the three recent privacy regulations that are most likely to serve as the starting points for the creation of a comprehensive consumer privacy bill in the United States: the European General Data Protection Regulation, the Calfornia Consumer Privacy Act/California Privacy Rights Act, and the Federal Communications Commission's Broadband Privacy Order. We compare the scope of personal information under each regulation, including the test for identifiability and exclusions for de-identified information, and identify problems with their treatment of de-identified information and of pseudonymous information. We compare notice requirements, including the level of required …

Section 230: The Internet's Most Important And Most Misunderstood Law Is Unfairly Under Attack, Málfríður A. Helgadóttir

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a foundational law enabling the modern internet, is under threat despite its critical role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. The article argues that Section 230 is essential for promoting free speech and innovation, as its repeal would force platforms to censor content to avoid liability, fundamentally altering the internet. Critics often misunderstand the law, and bipartisan attacks jeopardize its future, risking the unravelling of the internet as we know it.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 40, Iss. 2

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Keynote Address, Christopher J. Buccafusco, Jeff Kosseff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the evolution and impact of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, highlighting its role in shaping internet speech and liability. It traces the law's origins, key court rulings, and current debates about its future. The speaker emphasizes the need for informed discussion to address concerns about harmful content, platform moderation, and free speech.

It's Not A Subsidy To Big Tech, Enrique Armijo

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Most Section 230 reform efforts are based on the predicate claim that the immunity the statute provides is a "subsidy to Big Tech." The argument then follows that if government grants a subsidy to an industry, particularly a large one, there are no legal or constitutional problems with either conditioning that subsidy on certain conduct or revoking it altogether. This premise is wrong. It conflates a subsidy with an immunity, which is conceptually distinct. It misstates both the intended and actual primary beneficiaries of Section 230's immunity, who are not large social media platforms or search engines, but Internet users. …

Enhancing The Ftc's Consumer Protection Authority To Regulate Social Media Companies, Paul M. Barrett, Lily Warnke

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that Congress should enhance the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) consumer protection authority to regulate social media companies, focusing on procedural oversight rather than substantive content moderation. It proposes that the FTC ensure social media platforms maintain adequate content moderation systems, disclose algorithmic practices, and comply with transparency requirements, all while respecting First Amendment protections. The authors advocate for legislative reforms to clarify the FTC's role in addressing harmful content and to amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to limit liability protections for certain harmful activities.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 41, Special Issue

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Keynote Address, Lina Mendoni

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article presents a compelling case for the repatriation of the Parthenon Sculptures to Greece, arguing that their removal by Lord Elgin was illegal, destructive, and morally unjustifiable. The Greek government asserts that the British Museum's continued possession violates both historical and contemporary legal standards, undermining cultural integrity and international ethical norms. The argument underscores the sculptures' intrinsic connection to Greece's cultural identity and the global community's growing support for their return.

Panel 1: History Surrounding The Removal Of The Sculptures And The U.K. Purchase Of Elgin's Collection, Samantha Anderson, Elena Korka, David Rudenstine, Giovanna Bellesia

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article challenges the British Museum's claim that Lord Elgin legally and ethically acquired the Parthenon Sculptures with proper Ottoman authorization. It argues that the Museum's defense relies on flawed historical narratives, including the misrepresentation of key documents, and asserts that Elgin's actions were unlawful and harmful, undermining the Museum's moral and legal justification for retaining the sculptures.

Panel 2: Should The British Museum Return The Collection To Athens?, Michael Mccullough, Irini Stamatoudi, Elizabeth Marlowe, Kris Tytgat

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article challenges the notion that the Parthenon Marbles constitute a unique case for repatriation, arguing that this claim is both factually inaccurate and ethically problematic. It contends that framing the Parthenon Marbles as an exceptional case undermines broader efforts toward decolonization and restorative justice, as it dismisses solidarity with other formerly colonized nations seeking the return of their cultural heritage. The article advocates for a systematic approach to repatriation, emphasizing ethical obligations and the need for museums to adopt principles of restitution grounded in collaboration and equity.

Panel 3: The Universal Museum Myth, Irini Stamatoudi, Patty Gerstenblith, Elena Korka, Joe Baker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article critiques the concept of the "universal museum," arguing that it often justifies the removal of cultural heritage from its origin communities under the guise of public education and universal access. The discussion emphasizes the ethical and legal issues surrounding colonial-era acquisitions and advocates for a shift towards restitution and collaboration with source communities to address historical injustices.