Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

It's About Time: An Analysis Of Name, Image, And Likeness Legislation In The United States, Taylor Henderson

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Physical Sports Needing Virtual Boundaries? An Analysis Of Intellectual Property Issues Arising From Sport Nfts, Maeve Hyer

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

A New Order In A World In Motion: Brexit And Its Impact On The British Premier League, Walter Champion, Daniel Lee

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Dealer's Choice: Pressuring The Ncaa To Allow Student-Athletes To Participate In Certain Gambling Activities, Amanda Daoud

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Place Your Bets: An Analysis Of Name, Image, And Likeness Deals With Barstool Sports, Stella Pratt

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Raven Berzal, Raven Berzal

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Raven Berzal discusses her Note, Accelerating Toward the Inevitable: How Covid-19 Helped Alter Traditional Models of Talent Compensation in the Film Industry, which was published in Volume 41, Issue 1.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 17, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Cardozo Aelj Then And Now Interview Series: Emily Faro, Cardozo Law Class Of 2021, Emily Faro

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

Emily Faro, Cardozo Law Class of 2021, is an Associate at Reed Smith. Emily’s practice focuses on entertainment and media, advertising, marketing, data privacy and security, and corporate transactions. Emily was a Staff Editor on Volume 38 of the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, and her Note, Entertainment Consolidation, Content Monopolies, and the Future of Information, was published in Volume 39, Issue 3.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 04, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Lauren Chamberlin, Lauren Chamberlin

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Lauren Chamberlin discusses her Note, Reconsidering a Private Right of Action Under VAWA: How the Media Portrays Violence Against Women and Its Effect on Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, which was published in Volume 41, Issue 1.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 07, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

The Marathon Continues: Texas Nil Has Room To Grow, Johnathon Blaine

Texas A&M Journal of Property Law

College athletes are now permitted to profit off their name, image, and likeness. However, while a hodgepodge of different regulations exists state-by-state and Congress continues to drag its feet to pass a federal framework, Texas restricts college athletes from maximizing their name, image, and likeness earning potential. This Comment proposes improvements to Senate Bill 1385 that would allow college athletes in Texas to partner with the same categories of “taboo” products as their respective university and to endorse products from competing brands, provided such endorsement is outside of a university-sponsored event, with an exception allowing unrestricted endorsement of footwear. This …

Cardozo Aelj Author Interview Series: Cecily D’Amore, Cardozo Law Class Of 2022, Cecily D’Amore

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo AELJ Author Interview Series seeks to give our readers further insight into the Articles and Notes published in the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. In this interview, Cecily D’Amore discusses her Note, #FreeBritney: The Importance of Public Access to the Guardianship System, which was published in Volume 40, Issue 1.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 04, 2023. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Free Expression In Private Stadia: The Public-Private Nexus And The Reclamation Of Free Expression In Sport, Michael K. Park

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This Article examines how the degree of government and military entwinement with the private enterprise of sport may provide a sufficient nexus for state action, arming athletes with First Amendment protection they would otherwise not possess against private entities. It reviews sport’s historical and cultural ties to militarism and its venerated symbols before exploring the applicability of the theories of state action within the context of private stadia. Anchored by the symbiotic relationship theory, this Article analyzes how the interdependent relationship between the government/military and private sport enterprise may provide the mutual benefits necessary to establish a sports franchise as …

Border Search Rationales Ripe For Abuse, With Journalists Particularly At Risk, Bryan Sykes

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Note: Nft Art Heists: Analyzing Nfts Under U.S. Law And International Conventions On Art Theft, Kevin D. Brum

Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies

The non-fungible token (“NFT”) is a type of digital asset that is usually associated with an image and has a unique identifier. An NFT cannot be copied or reproduced, and records of NFT transactions are stored on the blockchain. NFTs are a recent innovation and have swept the world by storm. NFT sales tripled from 2019 to 2020 and DappRadar—the premier platform for hosting decentralized NFT portfolio management applications—estimates that NFT sales hit twenty-five billion dollars in 2021. Many NFTs appear to be artistic works and, either individually or in a collection, can be given away for free, sold for …

Note: Artistic Relevance In Artificial Intelligence? “Roger” That!, Kelly Heilman

Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies

In an era of technological revolution, artificial intelligence is shocking the legal field with its increasing popularity, power, and potential. The limits of property, personhood, and creativity are in question by both the public and the courts, leaving significant ambiguities in the law. Legal standards regarding the regulation of advanced technologies have raised unique and critical substantive questions for intellectual property rights, particularly that of trademarks, where the traditional purpose is source identification between consumers and goods.

Since the 1989 holding in Rogers v. Grimaldi, the use of trademarks for creative purposes, as a matter of First Amendment jurisprudence, …

Masthead

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Gonzalez V. Google: Testing The Boundaries Of Section 230, Ohona Chowdhury

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

Quantum Copyright Law: Schrödinger’S Cat, Banksy’S Shredder, And Art On The Edge, Richard Chused

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

An object has been assembled by artists I know that presents a fascinating set of conundrums about the relationships between quantum physics, shredders, random surprises, the value of art, and copyright law. Seems fantastical, right? And so it is. The object of concern is a metal box a little under four feet tall, about eighteen inches deep, and a bit less than three feet wide. The box is welded together along all twelve of its edges. It has an opening across one side. And there is a small control panel on top.

Before the box was welded shut, a set …

Changing The Game: The Emergence Of Nil Contracts In Collegiate Athletics And The Continued Efficacy Of Title Ix, Leeden Rukstalis

Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice

On June 30, 2021, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) suspended a 115-year prohibition on college athletes’ ability to profit from the use of their names, images, and likenesses (“NIL”). Historically, NCAA eligibility was determined by an athlete’s amateur status. Student athletes forewent compensation to preserve a line between professional and college sports. Today, the NCAA’s novel NIL policy recognizes an athlete’s right to publicity and allows them to share in the billions of dollars it generates every year. According to estimates, college athletes earned $917 million in the first year of NIL activity. By 2023, the NIL market is …

Video Games And The First Amendment, Eli Pales

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

The video game industry is massive, with an annual revenue of $180 billion worldwide; $60 billion of that in America alone. For context, the industry’s size is greater than that of the movie, book, and music industries combined. Yet, despite this market dominance, the video game industry is relatively new. Only in the 2011 decision of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association did the Supreme Court extend First Amendment protection to games. Still, the Court failed to define the scope of the game medium. As understood by an average person, a video game could be something as simple as Pac-Man or …

The Free Exercise Of Copyright Behind Bars, Viva R. Moffat

Washington and Lee Law Review

People in prison produce vast amounts of creative and expressive work—from paintings and sculptures to essays, novels, music, and NFTs—but they are rarely described as artists and their work is often not described as “art.” Prisoners also do not regularly take advantage of copyright law, the primary form of protection for creative works. They should.

Copyright provides a strong set of rights that combines strains of free expression values with elements of property rights. Copyright confers dignitary and expressive benefits and, for some creators, financial rewards. As such, copyright can be a tool to help prisoners improve their lives, both …